EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dibas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Yorio, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dibas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Yorio, T.
Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 223:203-209 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


Original Article

Microfilament Network Is Needed for the Endocytosis of Water Channels and Not for Apical Membrane Insertion Upon Vasopressin Action

Adnan Dibas*,1, Abdul Mia{dagger} and Thomas Yorio{ddagger}


* Mary Kay Ash Institute for Cancer Research, Dallas, Texas 75235;
{dagger} Jarvis Christian College, Hawkins, Texas 75765; and
{ddagger} Department of Pharmacology, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Fort Worth, Texas 76107

In the current study, a novel role for the microfilaments in vasopressin-induced water transport in toad urinary bladders, a popular model for the mammalian collecting duct, was established. Vasopressin-induced water transport was not affected by cytochalasin D (CD, 20 µM) or latrunculin B (Lat B, 0.5–2 µM), microfilament-disrupting reagents, suggesting that the initial trafficking of vesicles containing water channels and insertion of membranes into the apical membrane are microfilament-independent. After the removal of vasopressin, bladders treated with CD or Lat B continued to transport water at least 2–3-fold greater than those that received the vehicle. Furthermore, the enhanced water transport was inhibited by HgCl2 (1 mM), a potent inhibitor of water channel–mediated water flow, suggesting that the enhanced water flow was through water channels. In addition, Lat B and CD inhibited vasopressin-induced endocytosis of horseradish peroxidase (HRP), a fluid endocytotic marker. These results suggested that although microfilaments are not needed for the initial trafficking of water channels to the apical side, the microfilament network is essential for the retrieval of water channels following their insertion into apical membranes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Valenti, G. Procino, G. Tamma, M. Carmosino, and M. Svelto
Minireview: Aquaporin 2 Trafficking
Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5063 - 5070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Beaulieu, N. Da Silva, N. Pastor-Soler, C. R. Brown, P. J. S. Smith, D. Brown, and S. Breton
Modulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton via Gelsolin Regulates Vacuolar H+-ATPase Recycling
J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 8452 - 8463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.