EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, S. A.
Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 223:288-294 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


Original Article

Effects of Oral Administration of Tamoxifen, Toremifene, Dehydroepiandrosterone, and Vorozole on Uterine Histomorphology in the Rat

Kenneth P. Nephew*,1, Elizabeth Osborne*, Ronald A. Lubet{dagger}, Clinton J. Grubbs{ddagger} and Sohaib A. Khan§


* Medical Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, Indiana 47405–4401;
{dagger} Division of Cancer Prevention, Chemoprevention Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892–7322;
{ddagger} The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Chemoprevention Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35294–3361; and
§ Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267–0521

Tamoxifen, toremifene, DHEA, and vorozole inhibit tumor growth in rodent mammary carcinoma models and are promising chemotherapeutic agents for use against breast cancer development. In the present study, the effect of these agents on uterine histomorphology following oral administration to mature ovary-intact rats (n = 380) was examined. Animals received diet only (control), tamoxifen (0.4 and 1 mg/kg of diet; 10 mg/kg BW by daily gavage), toremifene (3–30 mg/kg of diet), DHEA (24–2000 mg/kg of diet), or vorozole (0.08–1.25 mg/kg BW by daily gavage) for 28 days and were either sacrificed or returned to a basal diet and then sacrificed 21 days later. Treatment with toremifene (all doses) or tamoxifen (1 and 10 mg/kg) for 28 days produced a decrease (P < 0.05) in overall uterine size and myometrial thickness; however, uterine luminal and glandular epithelia cell height increased (P < 0.05) compared with control. These compartmentalized uterotrophic and antiestrogenic effects of toremifene and tamoxifen were still apparent after 21 days post-treatment. Administration of DHEA (2000 mg/kg of diet) for 28 days had dramatic uterotrophic effects, increasing (P < 0.05) overall uterine size and stimulating all three uterine compartments (epithelia, stroma, and myometrium). The other doses of DHEA, however, were not uterotrophic. Interestingly, after removal of DHEA from the diet, uterine weight and myometrial thickness decreased (P < 0.05). Vorozole (1.25 mg/kg) administration for 28 days had differential, compartmentalized uterine effects, producing an increase (P < 0.05) in epithelial cell height, a decrease (P < 0.05) in stromal size, but no change in myometrial thickness. After 21 days postadministration of vorozole, luminal epithelial cell height was increased (P < 0.05) compared with control. The data suggest that oral administration of tamoxifen, toremifene, DHEA, and vorozole results in differential, compartmentalized effects in the uterus that are highly dependent on treatment dose. The data may have implications for risk assessment of these agents prior to administration to healthy, cancer-free women.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. C. Kwekel, L. D. Burgoon, J. W. Burt, J. R. Harkema, and T. R. Zacharewski
A cross-species analysis of the rodent uterotrophic program: elucidation of conserved responses and targets of estrogen signaling
Physiol Genomics, November 17, 2005; 23(3): 327 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Tynan, E. Pacia, D. Haynes-Johnson, D. Lawrence, M. R. D'Andrea, J.-Z. Guo, S. Lundeen, and G. Allan
The Putative Tumor Suppressor Deleted in Malignant Brain Tumors 1 Is an Estrogen-Regulated Gene in Rodent and Primate Endometrial Epithelium
Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1066 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Fan, X. Long, J. A. Bailey, C. A. Reed, E. Osborne, E. A. Gize, E. A. Kirk, R. M. Bigsby, and K. P. Nephew
The Activating Enzyme of NEDD8 Inhibits Steroid Receptor Function
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2002; 16(2): 315 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.