EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kühholzer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kühholzer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. S.
Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 224:240-245 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


Review Article

Advances in Livestock Nuclear Transfer

B. Kühholzer and R. S. Prather1,


Animal Science Research Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri 65211–5300

Cloning and transgenic animal production have been greatly enhanced by the development of nuclear transfer technology. In the past, genetic modification in domestic animals was not tightly controlled. With the nuclear transfer technology one can now create some domestic animals with specific genetic modifications. An ever-expanding variety of cell types have been successfully used as donors to create the clones. Both cell fusion and microinjection are successfully being used to create these animals. However, it is still not clear which stage(s) of the cell cycle for donor and recipient cells yield the greatest degree of development. While for the most part gene expression is reprogrammed in nuclear transfer embryos, all structural changes may not be corrected as evidenced by the length of the telomeres in sheep resulting from nuclear transfer. Even after these animals are created the question of "are they really clones?" arises due to mitochondrial inheritance from the donor cell versus the recipient oocyte. This review discusses these issues as they relate to livestock.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
R. S. Prather, P. Sutovsky, and J. A. Green
Nuclear Remodeling and Reprogramming in Transgenic Pig Production
Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2004; 229(11): 1120 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B. Kühholzer, R.J. Hawley, L. Lai, D. Kolber-Simonds, and R.S. Prather
Clonal Lines of Transgenic Fibroblast Cells Derived from the Same Fetus Result in Different Development When Used for Nuclear Transfer in Pigs
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2001; 64(6): 1695 - 1698.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.