EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Natelson, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Natelson, B. H.
Experimental Biology and Medicine 228:167-174 (2003)
© 2003 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Measure of Heart Rate Variability Is Sensitive to Orthostatic Challenge in Women with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Yoshiharu Yamamoto*,{dagger},{ddagger}, John J. LaManca* and Benjamin H. Natelson*,1

* Department of Neurosciences, New Jersey Medical School, East Orange, New Jersey 07018–1095;
{dagger} Educational Physiology Laboratory, Graduate School of Education, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; and
{ddagger} PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Saitama 332-0012, Japan

The use of symptoms generated by head up tilt (HUT) is not a useful tool in identifying chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We investigated whether heart rate variability (HRV) assessed early during HUT might be useful. A sample of 46 female subjects (24 with CFS and 22 sedentary, age-matched healthy controls; CON) who had exhibited no difference in time to syncope during tilt was examined for HRV responses to 10 min of 70° HUT after 5 min of baseline in the supine position. HRV data were analyzed by the method of coarse graining spectral analysis. Variables compared between groups included mean and standard deviation (SDRRI) of RR intervals (RRI), amplitudes of low- (ALF; 0.04–0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (AHF; >0.15 Hz) harmonic as well as aperiodic, fractal (AFR; 1/fß) spectral components, the spectral exponent ß, and the difference in these values between baseline and HUT for each subject. In the supine baseline, only mean RRI was significantly (P < 0.01) lower in CFS than in CON. During HUT, however, mean RRI (P < 0.01), SDRRI (P < 0.01), AHF (P < 0.05), and AFR (P < 0.01) were significantly lower in CFS than in CON. When the difference in values between baseline and HUT for each subject was examined, only the difference for AFR ({Delta}AFR) was significantly (P < 0.01) lower in CFS than in CON, suggesting that AFRis a disease-specific response of HRV to HUT. When a cut-off level was set to {Delta}AFR = -2.7 msec, the sensitivity and the specificity in differentiating CFS from controls were 90% and 72%, respectively. The data suggest that a decrease in aperiodic fractal component of HRV in response to HUT can be used to differentiate patients with CFS from CON.

Key Words: chronic fatigue syndrome • postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome • head up tilt • heart rate variability • fractal




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
J.L. Newton, O. Okonkwo, K. Sutcliffe, A. Seth, J. Shin, and D.E.J. Jones
Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome
QJM, August 1, 2007; 100(8): 519 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.