EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hussein, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Torell, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hussein, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Torell, R. C.
Experimental Biology and Medicine 228:352-357 (2003)
© 2003 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


SUPPLEMENT. FOOD SAFETY CONCERNS OF VEROTOXIN-PRODUCING ESCHERICHIA COLI

Verotoxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Culled Beef Cows Grazing Rangeland Forages

Hussein S. Hussein*,1, Brandolyn H. Thran*, Mark R. Hall*,{dagger}, William G. Kvasnicka* and Rodney C. Torell{ddagger}

* Department of Animal Biotechnology,
{dagger} Department of Microbiology, and
{ddagger} Nevada Cooperative Extension, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess prevalence of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) in culled beef cows at the time of shipping to slaughter. Feces were collected from 82 cows on eight Nevada ranches during fall and winter (from September to January) after grazing rangeland forages. A random sample (n = 154) of potential VTEC isolates were tested for verotoxicity and were screened for the presence (polymerase chain reaction) and expression (VTEC-reversed passive latex agglutination assay) of the toxin genes (i.e., VT1 and VT2). Seventeen isolates from four ranches were VTEC. Of these, four had the VT1 gene, five had the VT2 gene, seven had both genes, and one did not have either gene despite its toxicity to Vero cells. Except for one isolate (i.e., untypeable that reacted with VT1-latex beads without having VT1 gene), the genotype and phenotype data of the VTEC isolates matched. Another isolate (O8:H- [nonmotile]) was verotoxic, but neither had nor expressed the toxin genes. Of the 17 isolates, four (from one cow) were O157:H7, 11 (from five cows on three ranches) were non-O157:H7 (two O8:H-, three O105:H-, three O116:H-, and three O141:H-), and two were untypeable. Because some of these VTEC serotypes (i.e., O8:H-, O141:H-, and O157:H7) are known to cause human illnesses, it is beneficial to identify VTEC-positive cows before slaughter. This is a critical step in any pre- or post-harvest strategy to minimize the risk of beef contamination with such pathogens.

Key Words: Escherichia coli • beef cattle • culled cows • verotoxins • food-borne pathogens




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. S. Hussein
Prevalence and pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle and their products
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(13_suppl): E63 - E72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
R. N. Cobbold, D. H. Rice, M. Szymanski, D. R. Call, and D. D. Hancock
Comparison of Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli Prevalences among Dairy, Feedlot, and Cow-Calf Herds in Washington State
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2004; 70(7): 4375 - 4378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.