|
|
||||||||
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611
To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at 1 Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Olson Pavilion, Room 8258, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail: vcjordan{at}northwestern.edu
Forty years ago, the endocrine treatment for breast cancer was a last resort at palliation before the disease overwhelmed the patient (1). Ovarian ablation was the treatment of choice for the premenopausal patient, whereas either adrenalectomy or, paradoxically, high-dose synthetic estrogen therapy were used for treatment in postmenopausal patients. A reduction or an excess of estrogen provoked objective responses in one out of three women. Unfortunately, there was no way of predicting who would respond to endocrine ablation, and because so few patients responded there was no enthusiasm for developing new endocrine agents. All hopes for a cure for breast cancer turned to appropriate combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Today tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal antiestrogen (2), has proven to be effective in all stages of premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer, and several new endocrine strategies, including aromatase inhibitors, luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) superagonists, and a pure antiestrogen (fulvestrant), are now available for breast cancer treatment. Additionally, tamoxifen and raloxifene, a related compound, are used to reduce the risk of breast cancer and osteoporosis, respectively, in high-risk groups (3). Hormonal modulation and strategies to prevent the actions of estrogen in the breast are ubiquitous. However, with successful changes in treatment strategies comes the consequence of change.
This minireview will describe the current strategies for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer and present emerging new concepts about the consequences of exhaustive antiestrogen treatment on therapeutic resistance.
Key Words: raloxifene tamoxifen HER2/neu apoptosis selective estrogen receptor modulator aromatase inhibitor phytoestrogens
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Lupu and J. A. Menendez Targeting Fatty Acid Synthase in Breast and Endometrial Cancer: An Alternative to Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators? Endocrinology, September 1, 2006; 147(9): 4056 - 4066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Lewis, K. Meeke, C. Osipo, E. A. Ross, N. Kidawi, T. Li, E. Bell, N. S. Chandel, and V. C. Jordan Intrinsic Mechanism of Estradiol-Induced Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells Resistant to Estrogen Deprivation J Natl Cancer Inst, December 7, 2005; 97(23): 1746 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jaita, M. Candolfi, V. Zaldivar, S. Zarate, L. Ferrari, D. Pisera, M. G. Castro, and A. Seilicovich Estrogens Up-Regulate the Fas/FasL Apoptotic Pathway in Lactotropes Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4737 - 4744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Geisler and P. E. Lonning Aromatase Inhibition: Translation into a Successful Therapeutic Approach Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2809 - 2821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |