| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
,1,
* Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202; and Program in Medical Neurobiology and Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at 1 Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, 402 North Blackford Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail: goodlett{at}iupui.edu
There are multiple mechanisms by which alcohol can damage the developing brain, but the type of damage induced will depend on the amount and developmental timing of exposure, along with other maternal and genetic factors. This article reviews current perspectives on how ethanol can produce neuroteratogenic effects by its interactions with molecular regulators of brain development. The current evidence suggests that alcohol produces many of its damaging effects by exerting specific actions on molecules that regulate key developmental processes (e.g., L1 cell adhesion molecule, alcohol dehydrogenase, catalase), interfering with the early development of midline serotonergic neurons and disrupting their regulatory-signaling function for other target brain structures, interfering with trophic factors that regulate neurogenesis and cell survival, or inducing excessive cell death via oxidative stress or activation of caspase-3 proteases. The current understanding of pathogenesis mechanisms suggests several strategic approaches to develop rational molecular prevention. However, the development of behavioral and biologic treatments for alcohol-affected children is crucial because it is unlikely that effective delivery of preventative interventions can realistically be achieved in ways to prevent prenatal damage in at-risk pregnancies. Toward that end, behavioral training that promotes experience-dependent neuroplasticity has been effective in a rat model of cerebellar damage induced by alcohol exposure during the period of brain development that is comparable to that of the human third trimester.
Key Words: cell death • brain damage • apoptosis • oxidative stress • L1 cell adhesion molecule • rehabilitation
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Pignataro, A. N. Miller, L. Ma, S. Midha, P. Protiva, D. G. Herrera, and N. L. Harrison Alcohol Regulates Gene Expression in Neurons via Activation of Heat Shock Factor 1 J. Neurosci., November 21, 2007; 27(47): 12957 - 12966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. S. Wolff, P. J. Chiang, S. M. Smith, R. Romero, and D. R. Armant Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factors Prevent Apoptosis of Alcohol-Exposed Human Placental Cytotrophoblast Cells Biol Reprod, July 1, 2007; 77(1): 53 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. BRAZA-BOILS, M. TOMAS, M. P. MARIN, L. MEGIAS, M. SANCHO-TELLO, E. FORNAS, and J. RENAU-PIQUERAS GLYCOSYLATION IS ALTERED BY ETHANOL IN RAT HIPPOCAMPAL CULTURED NEURONS Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2006; 41(5): 494 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Dembele, X.-H. Yao, L. Chen, and B. L. G. Nyomba Intrauterine ethanol exposure results in hypothalamic oxidative stress and neuroendocrine alterations in adult rat offspring Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): R796 - R802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kumada, M. K. Lakshmana, and H. Komuro Reversal of Neuronal Migration in a Mouse Model of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome by Controlling Second-Messenger Signalings J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 742 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
