EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dai, X.
Right arrow Articles by Galligan, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dai, X.
Right arrow Articles by Galligan, J. J.
Experimental Biology and Medicine 231:746-751 (2006)
© 2006 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


BASIC BIOLOGY

Differential Trafficking and Desensitization of Human ETA and ETB Receptors Expressed in HEK 293 Cells

Xiaoling Dai1 and James J. Galligan

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and the Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824

To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at 1 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Life Science Building Room B308, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. E-mail: daixiaol{at}msu.edu

Abstract

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a vasoconstrictor peptide that acts on ETA and ETB receptors on smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Because vascular SMCs can express both receptors, it is difficult to study the localization and properties of each subtype. Therefore, we investigated the localization and function of ETA and ETB receptors transfected into HEK 293 cells. Immunocytochemistry was used to examine colocalization of ET receptors with the plasma membrane marker, pan cadherin. In cells transfected with ETA receptors, 83 ± 2% of these receptors colocalized with pan cadherin. In ETB receptor–transfected cells, 54 ± 2% of the receptor colocalized with pan cadherin. When ETA and ETB receptors were cotransfected, 97 ± 1% of ETB receptors colocalized with ETA receptors and 84 ± 2% of ETB receptors colocalized with pan cadherin. ET-1 and sarafotoxin 6c (S6c, ETB receptor agonist) increased [Ca2+]i in cells transfected with ETA or ETB receptors; 100 nM of ET-1 and S6c caused maximal responses. When stimulated with ET-1, ETB receptors desensitized faster (t1/2 = 21 ± 1 sec) than ETA receptors (t1/2 = 48 ± 1 sec). S6c-induced increases in [Ca2+]i desensitized in cells expressing ETB receptors only (t1/2 = 17 ± 1 s). Desensitization was eliminated in cells cotransfected with ET receptors. We conclude that ETA receptors localize to the cell membrane, whereas ETB receptors are in the membrane and intracellular compartments. Coexpressed ET receptors are in the membrane. ETB receptors desensitize faster than ETA receptors, but receptor coexpression eliminates desensitization. Finally, ETA and ETB receptors interact to change receptor trafficking which may modify ET receptor function in vascular SMCs coexpressing these receptors.

Key Words: desensitization • endothelin receptor • trafficking




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
N. J. Evans and J. W. Walker
Endothelin Receptor Dimers Evaluated by FRET, Ligand Binding, and Calcium Mobilization
Biophys. J., July 1, 2008; 95(1): 483 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.