EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brás-Silva, C.
Right arrow Articles by Leite-Moreira, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brás-Silva, C.
Right arrow Articles by Leite-Moreira, A. F.
Experimental Biology and Medicine 231:876-881 (2006)
© 2006 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


HEART

Obligatory Role of the Endocardial Endothelium in the Increase of Myocardial Distensibility Induced by Endothelin-1

Carmen Brás-Silva and Adelino F. Leite-Moreira1

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal

To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at 1 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. E-mail: amoreira{at}med.up.pt

Abstract

This study investigated how the endocardial endothelium (EE) and particularly endothelial type B (ETB) receptors influence the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on diastolic distensibility. ET-1 (0.1, 1, and 10 nM) was tested in rabbit papillary muscles (Krebs-Ringer; 1.8 mM CaCl2, 35°C) (i) with intact EE (n = 10), (ii) with damaged EE (0.5% Triton X-100, n = 11), and (iii) in the presence of RES-701-1 (selective endothelial ETB1 receptor antagonist, 1 µM, n = 6). Additionally, increasing doses (0.1 nM to 1 µM) of Sarafotoxin S6c (SRTXc, a selective ETB receptor agonist) and IRL-1620 (a selective endothelial ETB1 agonist) were studied (i) in muscles with intact EE (n = 7 and n = 6, respectively) and (ii) after damaging the EE (n = 8 and n = 7, respectively). In papillary muscles with intact EE, ET-1 induced dose-dependent positive inotropic and lusitropic effects. At 10 nM, active tension (AT) increased 78% ± 17%, maximum velocity of tension rise (dT/dtmax) increased 82% ± 10%, and maximum velocity of tension decline (dT/dtmin) increased 77% ± 17%. These effects were maintained when ET-1 was given after damaging the EE (AT increased 70% ± 12%, dT/dtmax increased 93% ± 14%, and dT/dtmin increased 56% ± 14%), but were significantly reduced in the presence of RES-701-1 (AT increased 30% ± 6%, dT/dtmax increased 37% ± 7%, and dT/ dtmin increased 29% ± 9%). ET-1 reduced resting tension (RT) and increased diastolic distensibility by 3% ± 1%, 5% ± 1%, and 9% ± 2% (at 0.1, 1, and 10 nM, respectively) in muscles with intact EE. This effect was abolished after damaging the EE or in the presence of RES-701-1. In muscles with intact EE, SRTXc had no significant effects, whereas, when given after damaging the EE, SRTXc (1 µM) increased inotropy and lusitropy (AT increased 116% ± 24%, dT/dtmax 110% ± 28%, and dT/dtmin 88% ± 19%) without affecting RT. IRL-1620 dose-dependently decreased AT, dT/dtmax, and dT/dtmin in muscles with intact EE—effects that were abolished after EE damage. No significant effects were elicited by IRL-1620 in RT. ET-1–induced increase in myocardial distensibility, previously shown to be mediated by ETA receptor stimulation, requires an intact EE and active endothelial ETB1 receptors.

Key Words: endothelin • heart • diastolic function • inotropy • endothelium • ETB receptors




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
C. Bras-Silva, A. P. Fontes-Sousa, C. Moura, J. C. Areias, and A. F. Leite-Moreira
Impaired Response to ETB Receptor Stimulation in Heart Failure: Functional Evidence of Endocardial Endothelial Dysfunction?
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.