EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online March 28, 2008
Experimental Biology and Medicine 233:522-534 (2008)
doi: 10.3181/0708-MR-226
© 2008 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
233/5/522    most recent
0708-MR-226v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlom, J.
Right arrow Articles by Arlen, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlom, J.
Right arrow Articles by Arlen, P. M.


MINIREVIEW

Paradigm Shifts in Cancer Vaccine Therapy

Jeffrey Schlom1, James L. Gulley and Philip M. Arlen

Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at 1 Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, CCR, NCI, 10 Center Drive, Room 8B09, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: js141c{at}nih.gov

Cancer vaccines constitute a unique therapeutic modality in that they initiate a dynamic process involving the host’s immune response. Consequently, (a) repeated doses (vaccinations) over months may be required before patient clinical benefit is observed and (b) there most likely will be a "dynamic balance" between the induction and maintenance of host immune response elements to the vaccinations vs. host/tumor factors that have the potential to diminish those responses. Thus "patient response" in the form of disease stabilization and prolonged survival may be more appropriate to monitor than strictly adhering to "tumor response" in the form of Response Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. This can be manifested in the form of enhanced patient benefit to subsequent therapies following vaccine therapy. This article will review these phenomena unique to cancer vaccines with emphasis on prostate cancer vaccines as a prototype for vaccine therapy. The unique features of this modality require the consideration of paradigm shifts both in the way cancer vaccine clinical trials are designed and in the way patient benefit is evaluated.

Key Words: cancer vaccines • immunotherapy • combination therapy • prostate cancer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. Cheever, J. Schlom, L. M. Weiner, H. K. Lyerly, M. L. Disis, A. Greenwood, O. Grad, W. G. Nelson, and for the Translational Research Working Group
Translational Research Working Group Developmental Pathway for Immune Response Modifiers
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 14(18): 5692 - 5699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.