|
|
||||||||
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 708084124
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of intraventricularly injected leptin were drastically altered by increasing doses of estradiol benzoate. There was no significant effect of intraventricular injection of leptin (10 µg) on the various parameters of either FSH or LH secretion in ovariectomized, oil-injected rats, whereas in those injected with 10 µg of estradiol benzoate there was an increase in the first hr in mean plasma concentration, area under the curve, pulse amplitude, and maximum increase of LH above the starting value (
max) on comparison with the results in the diluent-injected animals in which there was no alteration of these parameters during the 2 hr following injection. The pattern of FSH release was opposite to that of LH and had a different time-course. In the diluent-injected animals, probably because of the stress of injection and frequent blood sampling, there was an initial significant decline in plasma FSH at 20 min after injection, followed by a progressive increase with a significant elevation above the control values at 110 and 120 min. In the leptin-injected animals, mean plasma FSH was nearly constant during the entire experiment, coupled with a significant decrease below values in diluent-injected rats, beginning at 30 min after injection and progressing to a maximal difference at 120 min. Area under the curve, pulse amplitude, and
max of FSH was also decreased in the second hour compared to values in diluent-injected rats. In contrast to the stimulatory effects of intraventricular injection of leptin on pulsatile LH release manifest during the first hour after injection, there was a diametrically opposite, delayed significant decrease in pulsatile FSH release. This differential effect of leptin on FSH and LH release was consistent with differential effects of leptin on LHRH and FSHRF release. Finally, the higher dose of E2 (50 µg) suppressed release of both FSH and LH, but there was little effect of leptin under these conditions, the only effect being a slight (P < 0.04) increase in pulse amplitude of LH in this group of rats. The results indicate that the central effects of leptin on gonadotropin release are strongly dependent on plasma estradiol levels. These effects are consistent with differential effects of estrogen on the release of LHRH and the putative FSHRF.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Leptin plays a role in reproductive functions, as well as in central metabolic regulation. Mice homozygous for mutation in the ob gene and therefore leptin-deficient (1) are infertile (7), and have decreased blood levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and gonadal steroids (7). Reproductive failure in female ob/ob mice is reversible by injecting exogenous gonadotropins and progesterone (7, 8), demonstrating their deficiency of reproductive hormones. Furthermore, a relationship between a critical amount of body fat and the onset of puberty has been demonstrated (9, 10). Chronic treatment of ob/ob female mice with exogenous leptin restored their fertility (11), increased plasma gonadotropin levels, and had a trophic effect on the reproductive organs (12). Moreover, the ability of leptin to accelerate the onset of puberty in normal female mice has been demonstrated (13).
Earlier in vitro and in vivo studies from our laboratory demonstrated an acute stimulatory effect of leptin on the hypothalamic-pituitary unit in adult rats (14). Leptin produced a dose-related increase in LH and FSH release from incubated hemi-anterior pituitaries and LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) secretion from median eminencearcuate explants of male rats. Microinjection of leptin into the third cerebral ventricle significantly increased plasma LH concentrations during the first hr after its injection in ovariectomized, estrogen-primed rats. We hypothesized that the action of leptin to modify gonadotropin release may be estrogen-dependent; therefore, we investigated its role in the central effects of leptin on gonadotropin secretion. The results indicate that plasma FSH and LH are altered in response to central injection of leptin in an estrogen-dependent manner.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Procedure.
In our experiments, we used a model that we have employed to evaluate the effects of peptides on gonadotropin release, the ovariectomized estrogen-primed rat (14). Ovariectomized rats are used because removal of negative feedback by ovarian steroids leads to increased concentrations of gonadotropins, readily measurable by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and eliminates estrous cycleinduced changes in gonadotropin concentrations. Ovariectomy was performed using isoflurane anesthesia (Ohmeda Caribe Inc., Bend, OR) 34 weeks prior to each experiment. Six to eight days before the experiment, a 23-gauge stainless steel guide cannula was implanted into the 3V using the technique of Antunes-Rodrigues and McCann (15) employing ketamine/acepromazine/xylazine anesthesia (90 ± 2 ± 6 mg/kg i.p., respectively). Three days (72 hr) before the experiments, the animals were injected subcutaneously with 0.1 ml of sesame oil (ovariectomized; n = 8), 10 µg of estradiol benzoate (ovariectomized 10 estradiol benzoate; n = 6), or 50 µg of estradiol benzoate (ovariectomized 50 estradiol benzoate; n = 8) in 0.1 ml of sesame oil.
One day before blood sampling, a Silastic catheter was introduced into the right external jugular vein, advanced to the right atrium according to the technique of Harms and Ojeda (16) using the same anesthetic as for the 3V cannula implantation. This catheter allowed for the removal of blood samples before and after microinjection of leptin.
Blood Sampling.
The animals were left overnight in the experimental room for acclimatization. One hour before the experiment, polyethylene tubing filled with 0.9% NaCl containing 50 IU/ml of heparin was connected to the jugular catheter. Immediately after collection of the initial 0.3 ml blood sample (time 0), 10 µg of recombinant murine leptin from (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland; a gift to Dr. David York, Pennington Biomedical Research Center) dissolved in 5 µl of Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (KRB), or 5 µl of KRB alone was microinjected into the third ventricle over a 30-sec period, and blood samples (0.3 ml) were collected every 10 min subsequently for 2 hr. Each time the volume of withdrawn blood was replaced by an equal volume of 0.15 M NaCl. Blood was centrifuged (2,500g), and plasma was stored at -20°C until RIA.
Hormone Assays.
Plasma LH and FSH concentrations were determined using RIA kits supplied by the National Institute of Digestive Diabetes and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and expressed in terms of the NIDDKS RP-3 and RP-2 reference preparation, respectively.
Statistical Analysis.
Mean hormone concentrations, pulse amplitude and frequency were identified by the PC-Pulsar program (18) version 3.0 (Gitzen JF, Ramirez VD, Neuroscience Program and Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL) using default G (1-5) parameters (17) in each animal. The values of mean hormone concentrations, pulse amplitude, and the maximal plasma hormone increase (
max) are expressed in nanograms of hormone per milliliter of plasma. The
max is determined by taking the highest value during the experiment and subtracting from it the initial value for each rat. The area under the curve for LH and FSH was calculated by the trapezoid rule using a computer. All presented values are mean ± SEM. Multivariate analysis (MANOVA) was used to test for baseline homogeneity. The statistical differences of mean concentrations, pulse amplitude, and pulse frequency for LH and FSH between the three control groups were determined using PROC GLM, SAS program, version 6.2. All calculated parameters of LH and FSH release were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, and statistical differences between two means were calculated by Student's t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Effect of Estrogen on Simultaneous Pulses of FSH and LH and Pulses of Either Gonadotropin Alone.
The number of pulses of LH and FSH alone and of both hormones simultaneously was compared. In ovariectomized animals, a large fraction (more than half) of the pulses were of LH only, and a very small number of FSH-alone pulses (0.2/2 hr) occurred. Roughly one-third of the pulses were of both hormones simultaneously (Fig. 3)
. This pattern changed as the estradiol benzoate dose was increased. With the 10-µg dose, the number of LH-alone pulses was reduced by half although this change was not statistically significant (P < 0.1). The number of FSH-alone pulses and pulses of both hormones together was not altered; however, when the dose of estradiol benzoate was increased to 50 µg, there was a highly significant (P < 0.01) reduction in the number of LH-alone pulses and a highly significant increase in the number of pulses of FSH alone, whereas the pulses of both hormones together were almost extinguished.
|
Effect of Microinjection of Leptin into the Third Ventricle on Pulsatile LH and FSH Release.
The injection of 10 µg of leptin into the third ventricle did not alter the patterns of pulsatile LH and FSH release significantly and the mean concentrations of both hormones as compared to those of diluent-injected rats in ovariectomized, oil-injected rats. Leptin was also ineffective in ovariectomized animals injected with 50 µg of estradiol benzoate except that it slightly increased the pulse amplitude of LH (P < 0.04). Leptin had no effect in these groups on the areas under the curves of plasma LH and FSH as well (Fig. 4)
.
|
|
This effect of leptin in the first hour with respect to LH and the second hour with respect to FSH, was also discernible by calculating the
max and pulse amplitude for LH during the first hour, which were highly significantly elevated (P < 0.01), whereas in the second hour, they were unchanged (data not shown). Since these parameters were not altered in the second hour, when calculated over the 2-hr duration of the experiment, they were less significant (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6)
. Again, the pattern for FSH was different in that the
max and pulse amplitude of FSH were significantly reduced both in the first and second hours with a greater effect (P < 0.01) in the second hour and an overall significant effect for the 2-hr period (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6)
. The 10-µg dose of estradiol benzoate failed to alter the pulse frequency of either FSH or LH (Fig. 6)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
max of plasma LH concentrations during the first hour in these animals. In this experiment, we further analyzed the results with that dose and studied the effects of oil alone and a higher dose of 50 µg of estradiol benzoate on the release of FSH and LH. Both doses of estradiol benzoate produced an equal depression of plasma LH; there was little effect except of the high dose on plasma FSH concentrations. Furthermore, LH pulse frequency and the magnitude of pulses were dramatically inhibited in a dose-related manner by estrogen, whereas estrogen did not alter the frequency or magnitude of FSH pulses. A very interesting finding was the fact that in the ovariectomized animals, approximately 50% of the pulses were of LH only; an occasional pulse of FSH alone occurred with approximately 50% of the pulses of both hormones occurring simultaneously. This pattern changed as the dose of estrogen increased, so that with the higher dose of estrogen a remarkable suppression of LH-alone pulses, an increase of FSH-alone pulses, and a reduction in the number of pulses of both hormones released simultaneously occurred.
It is probable that part of the explanation for the different degree of depression in the pulsatile character of FSH and LH release is related to direct action of estradiol on the pituitary since the steroid was given 72 hr before the studies, and it is known that estrogen can alter responsiveness to LHRH in the rat. In general, it has been shown to increase responsiveness to this peptide (19, 20). No studies exist on the effect of estrogen alone on responsiveness to FSHRF although combined treatment of ovariectomized rats with 50 µg of estradiol benzoate and 25 µg of progesterone 72 hr prior to injection increases responsiveness to FSHRF (21); however, it is hard to see how these differences in pituitary sensitivity to the LHRH and FSHRF could account for the dramatic difference in the number of FSH-alone pulses and a decrease in LH-alone pulses that occur as the estrogen dose is increased. We hypothesize that the increase in FSH-alone and decrease in LH-alone pulses with increasing doses of estradiol is related to increased pulsatile FSHRF and decreased pulsatile LHRH release.
The differential effects of estrogen and leptin on FSH and LH release can be best explained by postulating the existence of an FSHRF. In recent experiments we have identified lamprey (l) GnRH-III as a potent FSHRF (21). l-GnRH is resident within the brain as determined by RIA of rat hypothalamic extracts fractionated by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25 (22). FSHRF is clearly separable from LHRH, and the FSH-releasing activity of purified FSHRF is abolished by a l-GnRH antiserum (22). l-GnRH cell bodies and axons are localized in areas that selectively control FSH (22). l-GnRH-III and FSHRF act to release FSH by activating nitric oxide synthase (NOS) (23; Yu WH et al., unpublished data, 1998). The release of NO stimulates guanylyl cyclase to release cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) that induces FSH release. LHRH and leptin act similarly to stimulate LH and to a lesser extent FSH (23). Specificity of the effects is presumably conferred by specific receptors for each hormone on the gonadotropes. FSHRF receptors have not yet been identified, but in view of the structural differences between l-GnRH-III and LHRH, both decapeptides but with different amino acids in positions of 58 of the molecule, we believe that distinct FSHRF receptors will ultimately be identified.
On the basis of this research, we hypothesize that FSH-alone pulses are driven by the FSH-releasing factor (FSHRF) (21), whereas LH-alone pulses are driven by LHRH. Pulses of both hormones together could be due either to simultaneous pulses of both releasing hormones or to large pulses of only LHRH since LHRH has intrinsic FSH-releasing activity. To determine which of these two possibilities is correct, it will be necessary to measure the levels of FSHRF and LHRH in portal blood. Similar findings with regard to separate pulses of FSH not accounted for by LHRH have recently been reported in castrate sheep (24).
The most intriguing results of our studies are that in rats pretreated with 10 µg of estradiol, leptin had opposite effects on the magnitude of LH and FSH release with a stimulatory effect on LH release in the first hour, and an inhibitory effect on FSH release manifest in the second hour. These effects were related to the dose of estrogen since little or no effect of leptin was found either in the oil-injected ovariectomized controls or in those animals that were given the higher dose of estrogen. The 10-µg dose of leptin clearly increased all parameters of LH release during the first 6070 min after its injection with a variable time course in individual rats. In contrast, the microinjection of oil into the third ventricle plus the blood sampling procedure itself, although producing no change in plasma LH concentrations, produced an initial decline, followed by a delayed rise in FSH concentrations that was completely blocked by leptin. The inhibitory effect of leptin on FSH release developed and became maximal in the second hour in contrast to the more rapid effects in the opposite direction on LH release.
The minor stress of microinjection and repeated blood sampling had no effect on the pulsatile release of LH driven by LHRH in the animals given the 10-µg dose of estradiol benzoate; however, this mild stress caused an immediate inhibition of FSHRF release followed by a stimulation of the release of this peptide commencing immediately after the nadir was reached at 20 min that reached a maximum at the end of the experiment. Intraventricular injection of leptin produced quite a rapid effect to increase the pulsatile release of LHRH only during the first hour after its injection, whereas it produced a delayed inhibition of FSHRF release that became significant during the second hour of the experiment. Since the stress of the procedures blocked FSHRF release during the first 20 min, it is possible that the inhibitory action of leptin on FSHRF release could not be detected until this initial stress-induced inhibition had dissipated. Therefore, the onset of leptin-induced inhibition of FSHRF may have coincided with the onset of its stimulation of LHRH release, but the duration of the inhibition clearly outlasted the stimulation of LHRH release. The reason for the different time course of the effect on the release of these two peptides is not known.
Interestingly enough, in castrated male rats, we have shown that the stress of blood sampling produces a stimulation of FSH release at the same time that LH release is inhibited (25). Therefore, there is an apparent sex difference even in castrated animals in their response to the mild stress of connecting the catheter and drawing small blood samples. The mechanisms for this phenomenon remain unknown.
We hypothesize that the site of action of leptin in these experiments is in the region of the arcuate nucleus since incubation of median eminencearcuate nuclear explants with leptin released LHRH (14, 23). Some of the leptin injected into the third ventricle in the current experiments undoubtedly reached the pituitary gland and even reached the peripheral circulation as well after passing through the pituitary gland (unpublished data, 1997); however, the in vitro sensitivity to leptin at the pituitary level is 100-fold less than at the hypothalamic level (14). Consequently, we believe that the results in the rats injected with 10 µg of estradiol benzoate are caused by its hypothalamic action to stimulate the release of LHRH and inhibit that of FSHRF. Furthermore, the effect on the anterior pituitary incubated in vitro was a stimulation of both FSH and LH release by leptin and not the differential effect seen here. That the effects were caused by this dose of estrogen is demonstrated by the lack of effects of leptin in the oil-injected rats and those injected with the higher (50-µg) dose of estradiol benzoate.
The evidence to date supports a role of leptin in induction of female puberty (5, 26-29). The current results suggest that this role may increase with increased estrogen secretion by the ovary as puberty nears and that leptin may play a crucial role in the onset of puberty in women (26). The reversion to a prepubertal state observed in patients with anorexia nervosa may be related to the decreased leptin release caused by the vanishing fat stores in these individuals (27). In collaborative research, we have shown recently that in women in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, blood leptin levels increase from a nadir in the morning to reach a peak at midnight2 AM. The pattern of LH release is dramatically altered at that time. As the peak of leptin is reached, frequent small pulsations are replaced by large infrequent pulses that continue throughout the rest of the night (26). It is possible that this pattern in women is brought about by the increasing estrogen levels provided by the developing ovarian follicles.
It will be interesting to study the role of estrogen further in modifying the hypothalamic-pituitary response to leptin. For example, we do not whether the levels of estrogen and leptin that were achieved in the present study are achieved physiologically. In any event, the data presented are consistent with a role of estrogen in modifying the central responsiveness to leptin mediated by changes in pulsatile release of LHRH and FSHRF that probably cause the induction of puberty and control gonadotropin secretion during the estrous cycle in rats and menstrual cycle in women.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA 708084124. E-mail: mccannsm{at}mhs.pbrc.edu ![]()
2 A preliminary report of this research was presented at the 27th Annual Meeting Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans, LA, October 2530, 1997. Abstract #237.7, p588 (A. Walczewska, W. H. Yu, S. Karanth, and S. M. McCann. The effect of estradiol and intraventricular injection of leptin on pulsatile LH and FSH release on ovariectomized female rats). ![]()
3 Present address: Institute of Physiology and Biochemistry, Department of Physiology, Medical University of Lodz, 90131 Lindleya 3, Poland. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Crane, N. Akhter, B. W. Johnson, M. Iruthayanathan, F. Syed, A. Kudo, Y.-H. Zhou, and G. V. Childs Fasting and Glucose Effects on Pituitary Leptin Expression: Is Leptin a Local Signal for Nutrient Status? J. Histochem. Cytochem., October 1, 2007; 55(10): 1059 - 1073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Licinio, S. Caglayan, M. Ozata, B. O. Yildiz, P. B. de Miranda, F. O'Kirwan, R. Whitby, L. Liang, P. Cohen, S. Bhasin, et al. Phenotypic effects of leptin replacement on morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypogonadism, and behavior in leptin-deficient adults PNAS, March 30, 2004; 101(13): 4531 - 4536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Peyon, S. Zanuy, and M. Carrillo Action of Leptin on In Vitro Luteinizing Hormone Release in the European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1573 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Mastronardi, A. Walczewska, W. H. Yu, S. Karanth, A. F. Parlow, and S. M. McCann The Possible Role of Prolactin in the Circadian Rhythm of Leptin Secretion in Male Rats Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1, 2000; 224(3): 152 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. C. M. Van Dam, F. Roelfsema, J. D. Veldhuis, F. M. Helmerhorst, M. Frolich, A. E. Meinders, H. M. J. Krans, and H. Pijl Increase in daily LH secretion in response to short-term calorie restriction in obese women with PCOS Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2002; 282(4): E865 - E872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |