EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carr, D. J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Gebhardt, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carr, D. J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Gebhardt, B. M.
Experimental Biology and Medicine 226:353-366 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


MINIREVIEW

The Immune Response to Ocular Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection

Daniel J.J. Carr*,1, Peter Härle* and Bryan M. Gebhardt{dagger}

* Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104;
{dagger} Department of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112-2234


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Humoral and Cellular Immunity...
 Strategies of Escaping Immune...
 Immune Surveillance and HSV-1...
 Gene Therapy with Naked...
 References
 
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is a prevalent microbial pathogen infecting 60% to 90% of the adult world population. The co-evolution of the virus with humans is due, in part, to adaptations that the virus has evolved to aid it in escaping immune surveillance, including the establishment of a latent infection in its human host. A latent infection allows the virus to remain in the host without inducing tissue pathology or eliciting an immune response. During the acute infection or reactivation of latent virus, the immune response is significant, which can ultimately result in corneal blindness or fatal sporadic encephalitis. In fact, HSV-1 is one of the leading causes of infectious corneal blindness in the world as a result of chronic episodes of viral reactivation leading to stromal keratitis and scarring. Significant inroads have been made in identifying key immune mediators that control ocular HSV-1 infection and potentially viral reactivation. Likewise, viral mechanisms associated with immune evasion have also been identified and will be discussed. Lastly, novel therapeutic strategies that are currently under development show promise and will be included in this review. Most investigators have taken full advantage of the murine host as a viable working in vivo model of HSV-1 due to the sensitivity and susceptibility to viral infection, ease of manipulation, and a multitude of developed probes to study changes at the cellular and molecular levels. Therefore, comments in this review will primarily be restricted to those observations pertaining to the mouse model and the assumption (however great) that similar events occur in the human condition.

Key Words: herpes simplex virus type 1 • neuroimmunology • cytokines • viral latency


    Humoral and Cellular Immunity to Herpes Viruses
 Top
 Abstract
 Humoral and Cellular Immunity...
 Strategies of Escaping Immune...
 Immune Surveillance and HSV-1...
 Gene Therapy with Naked...
 References
 
General Concepts.
Humans and animals infected by a herpes virus develop immunity in the form of circulating antibody and cell-mediated immunity, including T helper, T cytotoxic, and memory T lymphocytes (17). This constellation of specific immune factors serves to protect the infected organism from disseminated viral disease and death (810). Thus, the acquired immune response to herpes viruses such as herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is relatively effective in protecting the organism from morbidity or even mortality due to this virus (1013).

However, herpes viruses, including HSV-1, become latent in the infected host and can undergo reactivation and cause recurrent disease even though the host may have intact, innate, and acquired immune defenses (1, 3, 4). Recurrent herpetic infection is not uncommon in immune, healthy humans and can be induced to recur in immune, healthy animals (58). Understanding the paradox of how the acquired immune response protects against disseminated viral disease on the one hand and yet is not completely effective in preventing against recurrent viral infection is a goal that still eludes us.

In the paragraphs that follow, the ocular route of HSV-1 infection, the development of immunity subsequent to ocular infection, and the role of humoral and cellular immunity in HSV-1 ocular disease, both acute and recurrent, will be discussed particularly with reference to the conundrum of the coexistence of protective immunity and recurrent infection in the same individual.

Innate Resistance Mechanisms at the Ocular Surface.
Herpes viruses reaching the surface of the eye from an external source are initially suspended in the ocular tear film. Although largely consisting of water, the tear film contains a number of substances that have antiviral activity (14). Several tear proteins, including lysozyme, immunoglobulin A antibody, complement, lactate dehydrogenase, amylase, and peroxidase, may act to prevent viral infection of the ocular surface. The interferons, particularly the alpha and beta types, are also present in the tears during a viral infection of the ocular surface (1520). The key feature of ocular surface innate resistance is the constant washing of the ocular surface by tears produced by the lacrimal gland. Thus, molecules, cells, and infectious agents reaching the ocular surface are washed away rapidly and effectively. However, even though this first line of defense is effective, it is not an impenetrable barrier.

The outermost cells of the cornea are endstage epithelial cells that are no longer capable of replication (21). These cells are constantly being replaced by cells beneath them. As the outermost epithelial cells lose their cell-to-cell connections, they are flushed away in the tears. The intact corneal epithelium is a very effective physical barrier to infection by microorganisms. In addition to acting as a physical barrier, the outermost epithelial cells of the cornea are presumably poor hosts for herpes viruses because these cells are terminally differentiated and not capable of replication (21). It is evident that the herpes viruses replicate best in metabolically active cells (2224). When there has been a breach in the corneal surface epithelial cells, viruses such as HSV-1 can infect the underlying cells, which are metabolically active. Even in such a circumstance, however, the virus must attach to the epithelial cells, penetrate, and undergo replication. In the presence of sufficient endogenous interferons, this process may be blocked. Therefore, the sum and substance of the innate resistance mechanisms at the ocular surface is that they are very effective in preventing primary or secondary herpes viral infections.

Acquired Immunity and Its Role in Preventing Ocular Infection.
During a primary viral infection of the corneal epithelium, an inflammatory reaction occurs (25). This inflammation is characterized by an infiltrate of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), macrophages, and a scattering of other mononuclear cells, including lymphocytes and, perhaps, a few natural killer (NK) cells (7, 2633). The PMN response, properly speaking, falls in the category of an innate or nonadaptive immune response to primary and subsequent viral infection. There is considerable evidence to show, however, that the infiltration of PMNs is intimately linked to the adaptive response and facilitates the development of the acquired antigen-specific immune response (20, 3032, 34, 35). Thus, the PMNs and macrophages present in the acute inflammatory lesion in the corneal epithelium not only serve to scavenge virus-infected cells, but some of these cells produce chemokines that attract lymphocytes into the area and, as well, some of these cells express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules containing herpes viral antigenic epitopes, which are recognized by T cells entering the lesion (7, 36).

Regarding initiation of the acquired immune response in the cornea and the processing and presentation of viral antigens, it is likely that antigen-presenting cells such as Langerhans cells and macrophages engulf virus and virus-infected cells locally in the cornea and then transport these antigens to regional lymph nodes and possibly through the blood to the spleen, where they present these antigens to viral antigen-specific T lymphocytes (3741).

In this regard, it is evident that a highly localized herpes viral infection such as occurs in the corneal epithelium results in the establishment of systemic immunity in the infected organism (5, 7). Numerous studies over the past 40 years have shown that animals and patients infected with HSV-1 develop both cellular and humoral immunity, which is measurable in the blood and secondary lymphoid tissues such as the spleen and lymph nodes.

The cornea of the eye is an immunologically privileged site by virtue of its avascularity and dearth of lymphatic vessels (42). Acquired immunity, which is developed following a primary corneal infection, was originally thought not to persist in the cornea in the form of resident, antigen-specific T lymphocytes. However, recent reports have isolated HSV-reactive T lymphocytes from corneas of patients with a history of herpetic keratitis (43, 44). Not only are there T cells residing in the tissue proximal to the original site of infection, but also memory T and B lymphocytes specific for viral antigens circulate in the blood and lymph armed for the next encounter with the virus. Animals and humans who have been either immunized with herpes viral antigens or infected by herpes virus have circulating titers of antiviral antibody primarily of the IgG isotype. And, at the ocular surface, secretory IgA antibody secreted into the tears from the conjunctival associated lymphoid tissue and produced by plasma cells in the lacrimal gland should bind to infectious virus, prevent its infection of epithelial cells, and transport the virus away in the tear flow (45). Indeed, the presence of IgA isotype anti-HSV antibodies has been demonstrated in tears (4547).

Regarding the establishment of cell-mediated immunity following primary corneal infection by HSV-1, it has been amply demonstrated that cell-mediated immunity in the form of CD4+ T helper lymphocytes and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which are antigen-specific for viral HSV-1 antigens, are generated during a primary corneal infection in patients and in experimental animals (5, 7, 28). Numerous studies in the 1960s and 1970s demonstrated that patients who develop ocular infection by HSV had circulating peripheral blood T lymphocytes reactive with viral antigens in the lymphocyte transformation assay (5, 7). Presumably, a fraction of these cells persist in patients and in animals as a long-lived memory population that can provide a rapid response to the threat of viral reinfection or viral reactivation. As mentioned above, antigen-specific T lymphocytes that may be present in the infected corneal epithelium in small numbers during primary infection do not remain there once the infection has resolved (5, 7). Presumably these antigen-specific T cells migrate to regional lymph nodes and some enter the blood and lymph where they circulate. Numerous histopathological studies of human corneas and experimental infections with herpes virus in animals in which immunochemical staining has been performed indicate that the presence of lymphoid cells in the infected cornea is a transient phenomenon. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are found, as are macrophages and increased numbers of corneal Langerhans cells, during the acute phase of the infection (7, 28, 29, 36, 48, 49). This cellular infiltrate wanes as the infec-tion resolves and the cornea returns to its normal cellular architecture.

The benefit to the organism of having memory T lymphocytes specific for viral antigens at some distance away from the tissue originally infected and the site at which recurrent infection is likely to occur is not immediately apparent. It would seem more beneficial to the organism to have the memory T lymphocytes immediately at hand in the tissue threatened by viral reinfection. However, numerous animal studies have shown that secondary or recurrent infection of the cornea results in a rapid and intense infiltration of mononuclear cells, including antigen-specific T lymphocytes, macrophages, and NK cells (28, 36, 50, 51). The rapid mobilization of memory cells, followed by their replication and stimulation to secrete interferon and other cytokines provides a rapid response mechanism following viral recurrence (15, 1720, 5254). Furthermore, it is evident that recurrent viral infection of the cornea is prevented from spreading to adjacent tissues by virtue of response of the memory T cells present in the regional lymph nodes and those circulating in the blood. Thus, recurrent corneal infection seldom spreads beyond the borders of this tissue.

The NK cell mechanism of resistance should not be overlooked in any consideration of herpes viral infection. It has been amply demonstrated in patients and in experimental animals that NK cells and macrophages are key mediators of viral resistance (5563). Thus, separate from, and without the direct intervention of antigen-specific T lymphocytes, NK cells and macrophages mediate an important component of resistance to herpes virus and resolution of the herpes viral infection of a tissue such as the cornea.

Paradoxically, there is a circumstance of herpes viral infection of the cornea in which cell-mediated immunity appears to be immunopathogenic. In a distinct disease entity known as herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK), there is evidence to indicate that there is a chronic low level viral infection of corneal stromal keratocytes in the area subtending the corneal epithelium (25, 47). (Note that this observation has not been consistently observed and, therefore, may only occur in select individuals by means that are not fully understood, but may be either host- or viral strain-specific.). The expression of viral antigens by the stromal keratocytes may provide a chronic stimulus to antigen-specific T lymphocytes (48, 49). It is thought that the T lymphocytes recognize viral antigens on the keratocytes and kill by a cytotoxic mechanism. HSK is typified by its chronicity, lasting for weeks, months, or even longer, by its unresponsiveness to standard topical antiviral therapy, and by the relative efficacy of topical steroid therapy in treating this condition (25). These observations all point to a cell-mediated immunopathogenic mechanism for this disease process. These conclusions are supported by numerous studies in experimental animals, particularly in thymus-deficient mice and severe combined immune-deficient mice (48, 49, 6370). HSK is a unique clinical entity and is distinctly different from herpetic keratitis or short-term infection of the corneal epithelium, which responds to antiviral therapy and in which use of corticosteroids is contraindicated (25).

In summary, there are multiple innate and adaptive immune mechanisms that act to prevent sight-threatening infection of the corneal epithelium. These immune mechanisms are effective, but not absolute in terms of preventing infection and, in particular, from recurrent viral infection following reactivation in the nervous system. Subsequent sections of this review will deal with the role of immunity in the establishment, maintenance, and reactivation of viral infection.

Ocular Infection, Latency, and Reactivation.
The surface of the eye consists of several layers of epithelial cells that when infected by HSV-1, become inflamed in a disease process termed herpetic keratitis (25). Histopathologically, this acute infection of the ocular surface epithelium is characterized by the destruction of epithelial cells and the infiltration of acute inflammatory cells, including polymorphonuclear leukocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes. In humans and animals, herpetic keratitis is usually a self-limiting process that resolves within 7 to 10 days after the initial infection (25). During this initial infection, however, two key events take place that impact the infected organism for the rest of its life.

One of these key events is that the infecting virus enters nerve terminals in the corneal epithelium and is transferred by retrograde flow to neuron cell bodies in ganglia whose neurons innervate the ocular surface. These neuron cell bodies reside in the superior cervical and trigeminal ganglia (71). In the neurons the virus enters into viral latency, an inactive state in which the virus may remain throughout the life of the organism (1012, 7174). It is also possible, and not all that uncommon, that the virus may reactivate from its latent state and cause recurrent disease in the organ or tissue where the infection first occurred (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Anatomic relationship between the trigeminal ganglion and the eyeball. The ganglion sits underneath the brain and has several branches that lead to oral-facial structures, including the eye. Some of the neural fibers innervate the cornea and branch profusely throughout the corneal epithelium. Inset, schematic showing an axon in the corneal stroma branching and innervating amongst the corneal epithelial cells. The corneal epithelium has the highest density of nerve endings of any cell layer in the body.

 
The second key event that occurs during acute viral infection of the cornea is the establishment of acquired immunity to a large array of viral antigenic epitopes (5, 7). Animals given an experimental corneal infection with HSV-1 become seropositive for antibodies to this virus within 7 to 10 days of the initial infection (25). Similarly, during this time, cell-mediated immunity is also developed (26, 28, 64). Humans and animals that have undergone ocular infection by HSV-1 have long-standing immunity to the virus in the form of memory cells and serum neutralizing antibodies to the virus.

How, then, is it possible that the virus can reactivate from latency and cause recurrent disease in the presence of humoral and cellular immunity directed against viral antigenic epitopes? When HSV-1 infects the epithelial cells of the cornea, viral replication takes place for a period of 5 to 7 days. Subsequently, the resistance mechanisms of the infected organism are marshaled and the viral infection is prevented from continuing. During the 5- to 7-day period of viral replication, some viral particles gain entry to the neurites that interdigitate between the corneal epithelial cells (Fig. 2Go). These viral particles, once inside of the nerve fibers, are relatively protected from host immune mechanisms (11). The viral particles, or a fraction of them, are transported by retrograde flow to the cell bodies of neurons in the sensory ganglia such as the trigeminal ganglion (69). It is intuitively obvious that viral particles inside neurites and in the cell bodies of neurons are relatively protected from the host immune response. It also seems clear that during a primary infection when the infected organism has only innate immune mechanisms with which to resist the virus, viral infection of corneal epithelial cells proceeds relatively unimpeded and during this stage some viral particles gain entry to neurites. As the infection proceeds and host immunity is garnered, the virus inside the neurites remains protected, is transported to the neuron cell bodies in the ganglia, and occasionally into the central nervous system where the virus remains relatively protected from host defense factors (7274).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Schematic showing the magnified view of the relationship between sensory neurons in the trigeminal ganglion and corneal epithelial cells. Virus replicating in an epithelial cell enters the nerve terminals and is transported by retrograde axoplasmic flow to neurons in the trigeminal ganglion. The majority of the sensory neurons survive the entry of HSV-1 and serve as hosts for the viral genome during latency. Virus undergoing reactivation in a sensory neuron is transported back to the corneal epithelium by anterograde movement, where recurrent infection may occur.

 
At some point during the establishment of the primary infection and entry of the virus into the nervous system, the HSV-1 enters a state of latency in selected neurons (71). During latency, it is presumed that there is little or no viral replication, production of viral glycoproteins, or expression of viral protein antigens on the latent cell membrane (72). Thus, latent HSV-1 resides in the neurons shielded from the hostile immune processes that would render it noninfectious and eliminate it from the host. Some investigators have proposed that the host immune response is necessary for the establishment of viral latency (7577). Thus, the presence of a functioning B lymphocyte system and antiviral antibodies and/or the capacity of the infected organism to generate cell-mediated immunity are thought by some investigators to be necessary for the enforcement of the establishment of viral latency. However, since viral latency can be maintained in the neurons of mice deficient in both B and T cells, it is concluded by some that cellular transcription factors alone can enforce the latent state (72, 7880).

Immunity, Latency, and Reactivation.
Twenty years ago it was shown that HSV-1 could enter into a latent state in mice in the absence of a primary acquired immune response to viral antigens (81). Mice were simultaneously infected and given an injection of rabbit antiserum to HSV-1. The rabbit antiserum was cleared from the mice within 2 months, during which time the animals developed viral latency. These animals failed to mount a humoral antibody response and remained seronegative until the viral reactivation was induced. The viral latency was maintained in these animals for an indefinite period of time until reactivation was provoked by traumatizing the epithelial site originally infected. This study is one of the earliest to establish that an acquired immune response is not necessary for the establishment and maintenance of viral latency. In more recent experiments using immune deficient mice, it has been shown that HSV-1 can establish latency in ganglionic neurons of mice lacking functional B and T lymphocytes (7880, 82). These studies clearly indicate that once HSV-1 is in the nervous system in neurons, it is relatively inaccessible to the host immune response. In this location, then, the virus can exist in a latent state without suffering immune destruction.

It should be possible to harmonize the seemingly conflicting results regarding the role of immunity in the establishment and maintenance of latency. For example, the report that antiviral antibody plays an important role in the maintenance of latent herpetic infections in the trigeminal ganglion and the latter studies that revealed that antibody had an important role in the neuroinvasiveness of HSV-1 seem to contradict the results showing that viral latency could be established in the absence of antiviral antibody (75, 76, 81). Furthermore, it was noted that latency was stable in the continued absence of host immunity (81). This latter finding, along with the more recent observations regarding the establishment of viral latency in ganglionic neurons in severe combined immune-deficient mice, suggests that a humoral immune response is not an absolute requirement for the establishment and maintenance of viral latency (7880, 82). Harmonization of these seemingly conflicting results with recent findings indicating that CD8+ T lymphocytes are required for the maintenance of viral latency can be achieved by invoking a role for various cytokines in the establishment and maintenance of the latent state (83, 84).

As discussed elsewhere in this review, several cytokines, including the interferons and interleukin 6 (IL-6), are important mediators that affect primary acute viral infection of the eye and the establishment and maintenance of viral latency in the neural ganglia. Given the redundancy of various defense mechanisms in the vertebrate immune system, it seems reasonable to conclude from the experiments conducted to date using animals deficient in various immune factors, including antibodies, B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and macrophages, that these immune-deficient animals have other innate immune mechanisms such as interferon and perhaps other cytokines that serve to protect the integrity of the organism so as to minimize the effect of viral infection. Thus, even in mice with severe combined immune deficiency, it is likely that interferons alpha and beta, and certainly IL-6 are produced in quantities adequate to modulate the spread and severity of a viral infection. It has been shown that there is a persistent cytokine response in the trigeminal ganglia of mice latent for HSV-1 (8588). Cytokines such as IL-6 and various interferons bind to plasma membrane receptors, transducing signals into the neurons and other susceptible cells. One or more of the signal transduction events may render the cells resistant to viral replication. Similarly, cytokines and cellular transcription factors may act in concert to maintain viral latency and suppress viral reactivation. It may be that these cytokines and the mononuclear cells that produce them are responsible for the maintenance of viral latency by such a mechanism (Fig. 3Go). Maintenance of viral latency in neurons in mice with severe combined immune deficiency may well be regulated and maintained by a cascade of cytokines that act to maintain the latent state.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Schematic of the microarchitecture of the trigeminal ganglion. Clusters of neurons are scattered throughout the ganglion interspersed among the nerve fibers traversing through this tissue. During a primary infection, a ganglionitis composed of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and mononuclear cells, including lymphocytes, is seen. Once viral latency is established, the PMNs are no longer present, but many of the lymphocytes remain for months after the initial infection. Inset, magnified schematic of a sensory neuron around which are cytokine-producing lymphocytes, particularly T lymphocytes. Some of these lymphocytes produce cytokines, which help maintain the virus in a latent state. Viral reactivation may result from the loss of these lymphocytes in the ganglion and/or their discontinuation of production of the inhibitory cytokines.

 
We conclude that the early literature on the role of cellular and humoral immune factors in regulating the establishment of viral latency and maintaining the virus in a latent state can best be appreciated in light of the recent findings regarding the central role of various cytokines in limiting the spread of the initial viral infection and in suppressing viral reactivation in latent neurons.


    Strategies of Escaping Immune Detection by HSV-1
 Top
 Abstract
 Humoral and Cellular Immunity...
 Strategies of Escaping Immune...
 Immune Surveillance and HSV-1...
 Gene Therapy with Naked...
 References
 
As part of the co-evolutionary process of HSV-1 and its host, the virus has developed a number of mechanisms to escape immune surveillance/recognition that, in part, explain its prevalence of the virus in society. Since HSV-1 is obligated for replication inside the host cell, the innate and cellular immune systems are primarily involved in eliminating the virus. One component of the cellular immune system responsible for viral clearance are cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) that recognize virally infected cells through viral peptides expressed in association with class I major histocompatibility complexes (MHC class I) on the surface of infected cells. However, HSV-1 downregulates MHC class I expression (89, 90) through the high-affinity binding of the HSV-1 immediate early gene product ICP47 to the transporter associated with antigen processing molecule (91). This association prevents peptide interactions with the MHC groove, resulting in improper folding and exclusion of transportation across the endoplasmic reticulum (91). In nervous tissue, this process also occurs, but by an ICP47-independent mechanism (92). Even in those cells that still express MHC class I at levels that may be recognized and targeted by HSV-1-specific CTLs, the virus has developed additional means of evasion. Recent results suggest HSV-1-infected cells are resistant to CTL-induced, Fas-mediated apoptosis (93, 94). Coupled with the suppression of MHC class I expression, HSV-1 has evolved an elaborate means of escaping CTL detection and elimination of virally infected cells. HSV-1 has also been found to target destruction of activated CD4+ T cells (95) and CTLs through induction of apoptosis via T cell receptor-mediated upregulation of CD95 (96). In addition, HSV-1-infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells have been found to secrete transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1) upon infection (97). Since TGF-ß1 has been shown to downregulate IFN-{gamma}-induced MHC class II expression (98) and MHC class II expression drives CD4+ T cell activation, the presence of TGF-ß1 would favor the virus and act as another means of eluding immune detection. Similar to cell-mediated immunity, the humoral immune system also plays a role in controlling HSV-1 infection (99, 100). Therefore, it is not surprising that HSV-1 had developed a means of antagonizing the humoral response by binding complement, which may ultimately lead to a reduced B cell memory response to the virus (101). While humoral and cell-mediated immunity participate in controlling HSV-1 replication, the activation of these immune pathways is delayed with the innate immune response taking up the bulk of the anti-viral blockade within the first two to three rounds of viral replication. Therefore, components of innate immunity, including type I IFNs, are natural targets for disruption by HSV-1-encoded proteins. Type I IFNs (IFN-{alpha} and -ß) interfere with viral transcription, translation, and assembly of viral proteins (102). Recently, it has been found that HSV-1 ICP0 mutants are sensitive to the effects of type I IFN (103, 104) and resistance can be restored by supplying the ICPO in trans (Härle, Carr, and Halford, unpublished observation). Therefore, the ICPO-encoded protein counteracts the antiviral effect of type I IFNs by an unknown mechanism. Collectively, HSV-1 has evolved a number of strategies as countermeasures to the innate and adaptive immune responses to viral infections, allowing a sufficient amount of time for the virus to establish a latent infection and escape immune detection within the neuronal bodies of the sensory ganglion.


    Immune Surveillance and HSV-1 Reactivation
 Top
 Abstract
 Humoral and Cellular Immunity...
 Strategies of Escaping Immune...
 Immune Surveillance and HSV-1...
 Gene Therapy with Naked...
 References
 
Following the acute ocular infection of the host by HSV-1, the virus traffics to the sensory ganglion (trigeminal ganglion, TG) where latency is established in the neurons. During latency, the virus is thought to be quiescent, with no viral protein or transcript expression with the exception of a family of transcripts referred to as latency associated transcripts or LATs. Although there is debate as to whether the LAT gene family encodes (a) functional protein(s) (105), LAT expression antagonizes apoptosis-enhancing neuronal survival (106), which may increase the pool of latently infected neurons and facilitate viral reactivation (107). Such results are consistent with a study that found a direct correlation between the number of latently infected neurons and the potential for reactivation (108). Therefore, it seems probable that LAT is a key gene to be targeted for further study in advancing our understanding of latency and HSV-1 reactivation.

In the murine host during HSV-1 latency, it is difficult to identify any viral transcripts or proteins. However, numerous laboratories have shown a persistent immune response in the form of infiltrating cells and cytokine and chemokine expression during latency (86, 87, 109, 110), a time, by definition, when no viral transcript or protein is expressed, with the exception of LAT. Taken together, these observations suggest that LAT may be involved in the chronic induction of the immune system during times of viral latency. However, mice latently infected with a LAT null mutant dLAT2903 (doesn't express LAT transcripts) still show an elevation in cytokine and anti-HSV-1 titers during latency, indicating that the persistent expression of cytokine mRNA in the TG of latently infected animals is not due to the expression of LAT (111). Additional studies have been conducted to address the persistent immune response in the TG of HSV-1 latently infected mice. In one study, the antiviral compound acyclovir (inhibits viral DNA polymerase and causes chain termination) was used to orally feed mice latently infected with HSV-1. If viral gene transcription was active, acylovir would antagonize this process and potentially reduce the stimulus for the local, persistent immune response. In fact, in mice latently infected with HSV-1 and chronically treated per os with acyclovir, the expression of the cytokines (IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}), as well as antiviral antibody titers, significantly decreased longitudinally over 120 days postinfection (112). These results were interpreted to suggest that the virus spontaneously or incompletely reactivates infrequently at levels below detection, but enough to provide a antigenic stimulus for a continued immune response during latency. To further assess the chronic nature of cytokine expression in the TG, an acyclovir-resistant HSV-1 mutant (termed KG111) was used to infect mice and establish a latent infection. A dose-response study established a concentration of 0.3 mg/ml in the drinking water of mice infected with the parental virus (KOS) efficiently blocked HSV-1 replication in the TG during the acute infection. However, this dose antagonized only 50% of viral replication in the mice infected with the acyclovir-resistant HSV-1 mutant, KG111 (Fig. 4Go). Using this same dose of acyclovir to treat mice latently infected with parental or mutant HSV-1, results show that the mRNA expression of a prevalent pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 was significantly reduced in the TG of parental, but not KG111 latently infected mice (Fig. 5Go). In addition, anti-HSV-1 antibody titers were not different in the acyclovir-treated mice latently infected with the acyclovir-resistant mutant KG111 compared with the untreated controls (Fig. 6Go). However, such titers were reduced in the parental latently infected mice treated with acyclovir compared with nontreated controls (Fig. 7Go). Collectively, one interpretation of these results is that viral replication does continue during latency and acts as a stimulus for cytokine synthesis.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Acyclovir treatment reduces HSV-1 replication. Mice (n = 3–6/group) were infected with 1000 plaque forming units (PFUs)/eye of wild-type (WT) or mutant KG111 HSV-1 (KOS strain) following corneal scarification. At the time of infection, acyclovir was added to the drinking water at the indicated concentrations. Seven days postinfection, the mice were sacrificed and the eyes and trigeminal ganglia were removed and assayed for infectious virus by plaque assay.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Acyclovir treatment reduces IL-6 expression in the trigeminal ganglion of latent HSV-1-infected mice. Mice (n = 3/group per time point) were infected with wild-type (WT) or acyclovir-resistant mutant (KG111) HSV-1 and treated with acyclovir (0.3 mg/ml) in the drinking water starting 14 days postinfection. Mice were sacrificed at the indicated time postinfection and the RNA from the trigeminal ganglia was processed and analyzed for IL-6 mRNA expression by reverse transcriptase-PCR. The data is presented as a ratio of IL-6 to the housekeeping gene, GAPDH. *P < 0.05 comparing the vehicle with acyclovir-treated WT group.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Acyclovir treatment reduces anti-HSV-1 antibody titer in wild type but not acyclovir-resistant mutant during latent infection. Mice (n = 3–7/group per time point) were infected with wild-type (WT) or acyclovir-resistant mutant (KG111) HSV-1 and treated with acyclovir (0.3 mg/ml) in the drinking water starting 14 days postinfection. Mice were sacrificed at the indicated time postinfection and serum samples were assessed for HSV-1 reactivity by ELISA. The results are expressed as absorbance. *P < 0.05 comparing the vehicle with acyclovir-treated WT group.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. HSV-1 efficiently replicates in astrocytes, but not in microglia. Astrocytes (1 x 104 cells/culture) and microglia were infected with HSV-1 (McKrae strain, multiplicity of infection = 0.01) and the culture supernatants were assayed for infectious virus on the days indicated by plaque assay, using CV-1 cells as the indicator cell. The data are plotted as mean numbers of plaque forming units ± SEM. Values were derived from two experiments with triplicate cultures in each.

 
The question remains as to how HSV-1 can reactivate in the sensory ganglion during a seemingly chronically active local immune response and reappear proximal to the original site of infection. For example, TNF-{alpha} and IL-6 produced by satellite cells (Schwann cells) and infiltrating immune cells are implicated in the control of acute HSV-1 infection (18, 113, 114) and are expressed during latency (115). Since these cytokines are expressed in the sensory ganglion during latency, it is predicted that HSV-1 may not successfully reactivate. In part, this conclusion is supported by data. Specifically, mice, unlike rabbits and humans, do not appear to spontaneously reactivate with the recovery of virus. Furthermore, there is evidence showing that expression of the pro-inflammatory molecules (IL-6 and TNF-{alpha}) in the sensory ganglion has been restricted to the murine host. Therefore, it is currently not known if a similar cytokine profile is exhibited in the TG of the human host latently infected with HSV-1.

In the murine model, the latent virus is induced to reactivate by environmental stressors such as temperature or ultraviolet light. One advantage of this model is that cellular or molecular events may be specifically correlated with the acute or latent infection, allowing investigators to identify and map potential mediators of reactivation. As an example, during the acute, but not latent infection, MHC class I molecule expression is found on neurons and satellite cells (116, 117) facilitating the clearance of the virus by CD8 T cell recognition (83). Since MHC class I expression is reduced or absent during latency, such an occurrence may allow the virus to escape immune detection via CD8+ T cells. Moreover, during reactivation along with TNF-{alpha} and IL-6 detection, IL-4 is also present correlating with a reduction in IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} expression as the reactivation process evolves (115). IL-4 has previously been reported to exacerbate HSV-1 infection (118, 119), while IFN-{gamma} has been associated with antagonizing reactivation (88). Taken together, these observations suggest that the expression of IL-4 during the reactivation cascade may reduce TH1 cytokine production (including IL-2 and IFN-{gamma}) and allow the virus to fully reactivate.

Other factors inevitably play a role in controlling HSV-1 reactivation, including CD8+ T cells. For example, exposure of latently infected trigeminal ganglion cell cultures to an elevated temperature (43°C) for a brief period of time (10 min) eliminates the presence of CD8+ T cells and induces viral reactivation in primary, latently infected mixed neuronal cell cultures (120). In a similar vain, anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody added to latently infected TG cultures has also been found to induce reactivation of quiescent virus (84). In support of these observations, adding lymphocytes to latently infected TG explant cultures at the initiation of culture results in a significant decrease in the percentage of cultures undergoing reactivation (121). By eliminating CD8+ T cells from the mix, the antagonism is completely lost. Therefore, it would appear that CD8+ T cells participate in blocking HSV-1 reactivation by an as yet unidentified mechanism. Since these studies have been conducted in a rodent model, it is presently unclear if such results can be applied to the human host.

As previously stated, IL-6 is a prevalent cytokine expressed during acute HSV-1 infection, latency, and reactivation. Within the central nervous system (CNS), astrocytes, but not microglia, are sensitive to HSV-1 infection as measured by plaque assay (Fig. 7Go), producing a significant amount of IL-6 compared with microglia following HSV-1 infection (Fig. 8Go). Consistent with previous reports (113, 114), the addition of neutralizing antibody to IL-6 enhances viral replication, suggesting that during an acute infection, IL-6 antagonizes HSV-1 infection (Fig. 9Go). However, the role of IL-6 during viral reactivation from latency is less clear.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. HSV-1-infected astrocytes secrete elevated levels of IL-6 compared to uninfected cells. Astrocytes (1 x 104 cells/culture) were infected with HSV-1 (multiplicity of infection = 0.01). Uninfected cells served as controls. The culture supernatants were collected daily and assayed for IL-6 levels by ELISA. The data are expressed as means ± SEM and were derived from three experiments with triplicate cultures for each time point. An asterisk indicates P < 0.05 comparing infected with uninfected cultures.

 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. The addition of anti-IL-6 antibody augments HSV-1 replication in astrocyte cultures. Astrocytes (1 x 104 cells/culture) were infected with HSV-1 (multiplicity of infection = 0.01) and treated with anti-IL-6 or isotypic control immunoglobulin (Ig) (10 µg/culture). Supernatants were collected daily and assayed for infectious HSV-1 by plaque assay using CV-1 cells as the indicator cell line. The data are expressed as the means ± SEM of two experiments with four cultures at each time point. An asterisk indicates P < 0.05, comparing anti-IL-6-treated with Ig-treated astrocyte cultures.

 
Originally, a clinical trial using ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) to treat patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was found to frequently induce herpes labialis in patients receiving a high dose of the compound (122). Since CNTF shares a common signaling cascade (gp130) with IL-6 following binding to its cell surface receptor, it was proposed that IL-6 might also elicit HSV-1 reactivation. To test this hypothesis, mice latently infected with HSV-1 and treated with neutralizing antibody to IL-6 were induced to reactivate using an ultraviolet light source. Mice treated with the anti-IL-6 antibody showed a significantly reduced level of ocular reactivation compared with control antiserum-treated mice (123). Upon further inspection, these investigators found a potential explanation for such an observation at the molecular level. Specifically, within the HSV-1 genome, consensus recognition sequences for cellular transcription factors associated with IL-6 receptor activation (namely, signal transducer and activator of transcription, STAT-3, and nuclear factor-IL-6, NF-IL-6) were identified within the inverted repeat regions associated with viral reactivation (124). Therefore, the virus was potentially capable of utilizing endogenous IL-6 levels produced by satellite cells of the peripheral nervous system or infiltrating leukocytes of the immune system to facilitate reactivation. Since the time of these initial observations, supporting and conflicting data have surfaced. In one study, antagonizing stress-induced elevations in TG IL-6 blocked HSV-1 reactivation (125). In another study, latently infected TG explant cultures treated with anti-IL-6 antibody showed a reduction in the frequency of reactivation (121). However, latently infected IL-6 knockout mice showed no difference in the frequency of viral reactivation in comparison with wild-type controls following ultraviolet light stimulation (114). One explanation for this discrepancy may reside in the redundancy of function within the IL-6 family of molecules, including CNTF, IL-11, and leukemia inhibitory factor that compensate for the absence of IL-6 in the knockout mice. Although it is interesting to note the unique and potential association between IL-6 and HSV-1, the current data only supports the maxim: Guilt by Association. Additional studies are warranted to more closely address the complex relationship between IL-6 and HSV-1 reactivation.

There is little doubt that during latency HSV-1 provides a stimulus for continued low level cytokine and chemokine production within the sensory ganglion harboring latent virus. The potential pathological manifestations that are a consequence of chronic cytokine production within the central or peripheral nervous system as a result of HSV-1 latency have not been addressed, but should be considered (126). In addition, given the recent data to suggest human herpes virus 6 contributes to the development of multiple sclerosis (127), it is tempting to speculate that HSV-1 may also contribute to neurological pathogenesis. To this end, a recent observation has shown cross-reactivity between HSV-1 antigens and the {alpha}-chain of the acetylcholine receptor (128).


    Gene Therapy with Naked DNA Plasmid Constructs in the Eye: An Approach to Resolve HSV Infection?
 Top
 Abstract
 Humoral and Cellular Immunity...
 Strategies of Escaping Immune...
 Immune Surveillance and HSV-1...
 Gene Therapy with Naked...
 References
 
Inherited and acquired diseases represent primary targets for this therapeutic approach and about 200 Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee- (RAC) approved clinical trials relating to gene therapy are under investigation. Protocols focus on the repair or replacement of mutated genes, the regulation of gene expression and signal transduction, the targeting of malignant cells for destruction, and the manipulation of the immune system with the development of new vaccination techniques. Viral vectors, including herpes viruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, and retroviruses, are among the most commonly used gene delivery systems (129). However, cells are capable of taking up naked DNA and expressing their genes without the aid of transfer vectors. Technical questions regarding the appropriate vector or the choice of the most efficacious regulatory protein for each targeted disease still remain (130, 131). This implies that successful gene therapy requires not only the search for the best delivery system, but also requires a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of the targeted disease.

Gene Therapy with Naked DNA Plasmid Constructs.
Gene delivery with naked DNA is an accessible and cost-effective approach to delivering genes into somatic cells. The gene of interest is cloned into a plasmid vector that contains additional prokaryotic, eukaryotic, and viral sequences. The prokaryotic sequences are necessary for bacterial propagation, while the eukaryotic and viral sequences encode for promotors (e.g., cytomegalovirus and Rous sarcoma virus) and enhancers of transgene expression (e.g., SV40- and bovine growth hormone-polyadenylation signal, Kozak sequence) (129, 132). Prior to transgene expression, naked plasmid constructs are internalized by cells. This step occurs with low efficiency, but can be enhanced by chemical (e.g. CaPO4-DNA precipitation, complex formation with negatively charged organic polymers, and others) and physical means (gene gun, electroporation, and microinjection of DNA directly into cell nuclei). Many enhancers of transfection efficiency induce a cellular response themselves, indicating appropriate controls are required to specifically identify transgene effects (133).

A crucial consideration in naked DNA delivery is the route by which the plasmid construct is administered. Considering the treatment of a local disease, e.g., ocular HSV infection and the low transfection efficiency of naked DNA, the administration of the transgene at the site of infection is warranted to obtain maximum effect. However, studies have shown the local administration of plasmid DNA is expressed systemically (134). Locally administered transgenes are taken up by scavenger receptor-mediated pathways (135, 136) or polyanion-defined receptors (137) on targeted cells, preventing DNA degradation. In contrast, intravenous injection of naked DNA does not exhibit a systemic transgene expression pattern due to dilution of the transgene and rapid clearance from the blood stream by the reticuloendothelial system (129). Another efficient technique of administering plasmid DNA is via intramuscular injection, which tends to reduce local inflammation (138, 139) and has been proven effective against cytomegalovirus (CMV) (140).

Treatment of Ocular HSV-1 Infection with Naked DNA Vectors Encoding for Cytokines.
The use of gene therapy has been studied in numerous diseases including cancer therapy, metabolic disorders, and various infectious diseases (3), including HSV-1. Antiviral agents including acyclovir, gancyclovir, penicyclovir, cidovir and foscarnet are effective in controlling the acute infection and continuous antiviral medication has been shown to significantly reduce the rate of recurrent stromal keratitis (141). Unfortunately, after ending the prophylaxis the recurrence rate raises to levels of placebo-treated patients. In addition to these observations, reports of resistance to the above mentioned antiviral drugs are accumulating (142, 143). These entities led to the recent attention of gene therapy for this disease.

One of the first studies evaluating cytokine gene therapy against ocular HSV-1 infection and pathology applied naked DNA encoding IL-10 into mouse eyes showing HSV-1 induced lesions (144). A one-time administration of IL-10 DNA resulted in reduced ocular pathology. The rationale for this therapeutic approach was the observation that tissue destruction was linked to TH1 cytokines IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} (53) and animals with spontaneous resolution of HSV-1 lesions revealed elevated TH 2 cytokines, e.g., IL-10 (145). IL-10 is known to inhibit the activation and cytokine production of CD4+ lymphocytes (TH1-subtypes) and PMNs resulting in decreased immunopathology in the cornea. However, the reduction of type 1 cytokines does not reduce viral titers and does not inhibit the establishment of latency.

Therefore, a second approach was undertaken to inhibit viral replication and with this prevent the establishment of latency. To this end, previous results had identified (directly or indirectly) type I IFNs (i.e., IFN-{alpha} and IFN-ß) to be potent inhibitors of viral replication during ocular HSV-1 infection (17, 146).

Based on these observations, a plasmid construct encoding for murine IFN-{alpha}1 (pCMVß-IFN-{alpha}1) was constructed and administered onto mouse corneas prior to ocular HSV-1 infection. Transgene expression markedly reduced HSV-1 load and viral gene expression in the eye and TG, which correlated with a reduction in immune cell infiltration in cornea and iris (147, 148). In addition, pCMVß-IFN-{alpha}1-transfected eyes induced a 5-fold increase in MHC class I mRNA expression over vector-treated controls, implying the local expression of the transgene product (148). The depletion of CD4+ or CD8+ T-lymphocytes completely abrogated resistance to ocular HSV-1 infection induced by the IFN-{alpha} transgene. These results imply that not only innate, but also adaptive immune defense mechanisms play a role in the efficacy of the IFN-{alpha} transgene. However, only the local application of the IFN-{alpha} transgene at the ocular site conferred protection against HSV-1 mortality, whereas administration at other mucosal sites, including intranasal or intravaginal, did not (148). Similar results were also noted for treatment of ocular herpes with a murine IFN-ß transgene (149). Unfortunately, type I IFN naked DNA therapy only has been found to be effective if the plasmid is administered 24 hr prior to or after ocular infection. Due to the limitations of the present therapy, further studies are underway to identify additional type I IFN constructs that are effective against ocular HSV-1, as well as to characterize gene delivery systems to optimize transgene expression.z


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to Dr. Don Coen (Harvard Medical School) for providing the HSV-1 KG111 acyclovir-resistant mutant. In addition, the authors would like to thank Ms. Livia Veress for her technical assistance in those experiments using the acyclovir-resistant mutants.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by USPHS NIH grants EY12409 (to D. J. J. C.) and EY02672 and EY02377 (to B. M. G.).

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at Department of Ophthalmology, DMEI No. 415, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 608 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. E-mail: dan-carr{at}ouhsc.edu Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Humoral and Cellular Immunity...
 Strategies of Escaping Immune...
 Immune Surveillance and HSV-1...
 Gene Therapy with Naked...
 References
 

  1. Russell AS. Cell-mediated immunity to herpes simplex virus in man. J Infect Dis 129:142–146, 1974.[Medline]
  2. Lopez C, O'Reilly RJ. Cell-mediated immune responses in recurrent herpesvirus infections. I. Lymphocyte proliferation assay. J Immunol 118:895–902, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rasmussen L, Merigan TC. Role of T lymphocytes in cellular immune responses during herpes simplex virus infection in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75:3957–3961, 1978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Nesburn AB. Immunological aspects of ocular herpes simplex disease. In: Immunology of the Eye: III. London: IRL Press Limited, pp21–42, 1978.
  5. Chandler JW. Herpes keratitis and the immune system. Ophthalmic Forum 2:189–194, 1984.
  6. Kohl S. Herpes simplex virus immunology: Problems, progress, and promises. J Infect Dis 152:435–440, 1985.[Medline]
  7. Pepose JS. Herpes simplex keratitis: Role of viral infection versus immune response. Surv Ophthalmol 35:345–352, 1991.[Medline]
  8. Straus SE, Rooney JF, Sever JL, Seidlin M, Nusinoff-Lehrman S, Cremer K. Herpes simplex virus infection: Biology, treatment, and prevention. Ann Intern Med 103:404–419, 1985.
  9. Simmons A, Tscharke D, Speck P. The role of immune mechanisms in control of herpes simplex virus infection of the peripheral nervous system. In: Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Vol. 179:pp34–56, 1992.
  10. Pereira FA. Herpes simplex: Evolving concepts. J Am Acad Dermatol 35:503–520, 1996.[Medline]
  11. Whitley RJ, Kimberlin DW, Roizman B. Herpes simplex virus. Clin Infect Dis 26:541–555, 1998.[Medline]
  12. Miller CS, Danaher RJ, Jacob RJ. Molecular aspects of herpes simplex virus I latency, reactivation, and recurrence. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9:541–562, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Daheshia M, Feldman LT, Rouse BT. Herpes simplex virus latency and the immune response. Curr Opin Microbiol 1:430–435, 1998.[Medline]
  14. Farris RL. Abnormalities of the tears and treatment of dry eyes. In: Kaufman HE, Barron BA, and McDonald MB, Eds. The Cornea. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp109–130, 1998.
  15. Kaufman HE, Meyer RF, Laibson PR, Waltman SR, Nesburn AB, Shuster JJ. Human leukocyte interferon for the prevention of recurrences of herpetic keratitis. J Infect Dis 113(Suppl): A165–A169, 1976.
  16. Neumann-Haefelin D, Sundmacher R, Frey H, Merk W. Recombinant HulFN-gamma prevents herpes simplex keratitis in African green monkeys: Demonstration of synergism with recombinant HulFN-alpha 2. Med Microbiol Immunol 174:81–86, 1985.[Medline]
  17. Hendricks RL, Weber PC, Taylor JL, Koumbis A, Tumpey TM, Glorioso JC. Endogenously produced interferon-{alpha} protects mice from herpes simplex virus type 1 corneal disease. J Gen Virol 72:1601–1610, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Chen S-H, Oakes JE, Lausch RN. Synergistic anti-herpes effect of TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma} in human corneal epithelial cells compared with that in corneal fibroblasts. Antiviral Res 25:201–213, 1994.[Medline]
  19. Babu JS, Kanagat S, Rouse BT. T cell cytokine mRNA expression during the course of the immunopathologic ocular disease herpetic stromal keratitis. J Immunol 154:4822–4829, 1995.[Abstract]
  20. Tang Q, Hendricks RL. Interferon-{gamma} regulates platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 expression and neutrophil infiltration into herpes simplex virus-infected mouse corneas. J Exp Med 184:1435–1447, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Klyce SD, Beuerman RW. Structure and function of the cornea. In: Kaufman HE, Barron BA, and McDonald MB, Eds. The Cornea. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp3–50, 1998.
  22. Schang LM, Phillips J, Schaffer PA. Requirement for cellular cyclin-dependent kinases in herpes simplex virus replication and transcription. J Virol 72:5626–5637, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Advani SJ, Brandimarti R, Weichselbaum RR, Roizman B. The disappearance of cyclins A and B and the increase in activity of the G2/M-phase cellular kinase cdc2 in herpes simplex virus 1-infected cells require expression of the {alpha}22/US1.5 and UL13 viral genes. J Virol 74:8–15, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Schang LM, Rosenberg A, Schaffer PA. Roscovitine, a specific inhibitor of cellular cyclin-dependent kinases, inhibits herpes simplex virus DNA synthesis in the presence of viral early proteins. J Virol 74:2107–2120, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kaufman HE, Rayfield MA, Gebhardt BM. Herpes simplex viral infections. In: Kaufman HE, Barron BA, McDonald MB, Eds. The Cornea. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp247–278, 1998.
  26. Meyers-Elliott RH, Chitjian PA. Immunopathogenesis of corneal inflammation in herpes simplex virus stromal keratitis: Role of the polymorphonuclear leukocyte. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 20:784–798, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tullo AB, Shimeld C, Blyth WA, Hill TJ, Easty DL. Ocular infection with herpes simplex virus in nonimmune and immune mice. Arch Ophthalmol 101:961–964, 1983.[Abstract]
  28. Hendricks RL, Tumpey TM. Contribution of virus and immune factors to herpes simplex virus type I-induced corneal pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:1929–1939, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Niemialtowski MG, Rouse BT. Phenotypic and functional studies on ocular T cells during herpetic infections of the eye. J Immunol 148:1864–1870, 1992.[Abstract]
  30. Brandi CR, Salkowski CA. Activation of NK cells in mice following corneal infection with herpes simplex virus type-1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:113–120, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Tumpey TM, Chen S-H, Oakes JE, Lausch RN. Neutrophil-mediated suppression of virus replication after herpes simplex virus type 1 infection of the murine cornea. J Virol 70:898–904, 1996.[Abstract]
  32. Yan X-T, Tumpey TM, Kunkel SL, Oakes JE, Lausch RN. Role of MIP-2 in neutrophil migration and tissue injury in the herpes simplex virus-1-infected cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:1854–1862, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ghiasi H, Cai S, Perng G-C, Nesburn AB, Wechsler SL. The role of natural killer cells in protection of mice against death and corneal scarring following ocular HSV-1 infection. Antiviral Res 45:33–45, 2000.[Medline]
  34. Gangappa S, Babu JS, Thomas J, Daheshia M, Rouse BT. Virus-induced immunoinflammatory lesions in the absence of viral antigen recognition. J Immunol 161:4289–4300, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Thomas J, Kanangat S, Rouse BT. Herpes simplex virus replication-induced expression of chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines in the eye: Implications in herpetic stromal keratitis. J Interferon Cytokine Res 18:681–690, 1998.[Medline]
  36. Shimeld C, Whiteland JL, Nicholls SM, Easty DL, Hill TJ. Immune cell infiltration in corneas of mice with recurrent herpes simplex virus disease. J Gen Virol 77:977–985, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Lawkowicz-Moss, SJ, Shimeld C, Lipworth K, Hill TJ, Blyth WA, Easty DL. Quantitative studies on Langerhans cells in mouse corneal epithelium following infection with herpes simplex virus. Exp Eye Res 45:127–140, 1987.[Medline]
  38. Pepose J. The relationship of corneal Langerhans cells to herpes simplex antigens during dendritic keratitis. Curr Eye Res 8:851–858, 1989.[Medline]
  39. Hendricks RL, Janowicz M, Tumpey TM. Critical role of corneal Langerhans cells in the CD4- but not CD8-mediated immunopathology in herpes simplex virus-1-infected mouse corneas. J Immunol 148:2522–2529, 1992.[Abstract]
  40. Jager MJ, Bradley D, Atherton S, Streilein JW. Presence of Langerhans cells in the central cornea linked to the development of ocular herpes in mice. Exp Eye Res 54:835–841, 1992.[Medline]
  41. Miller JK, Laycock KA, Nash MM, Pepose JS. Corneal Langerhans cell dynamics after herpes simplex virus reactivation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:2282–2290, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Allansmith MR. The Eye and Immunology. St. Louis: CV Mosby Company, 1982.
  43. Verjans GMGM, Remeijer L, van Binnendijk RS, Cornelissen JGC, Volker-Dieben HJ, Baarsma SG, Osterhaus ADME. Identification and characterization of herpes simple virus-specific CD4+ T cells in corneas of herpetic stromal keratitis patients. J Infect Dis 177:484–488, 1998.[Medline]
  44. Koelle DM, Rymond SN, Chen H, Kwok WW, McClurkan C, Gyaltsong T, Petersdorf EW, Rotkis W, Talley AR, Harrison DA. Tegument-specific, virus-reactive CD4 T cells localize to the cornea in herpes simplex virus interstitial keratitis in humans. J Virol 74:10930–10938, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Centifanto YM, Little JM, Kaufman HE. The relationship between virus chemotherapy, secretory antibody formation and recurrent herpetic disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 173:649–656, 1970.
  46. Shani L, Szanton E, David R, Yuassur Y, Sarov I. Studies on HSV-specific IgA antibodies in lacrimal fluid from patients with herpes keratitis by solid phase radioimmunoassay. Curr Eye Res 4:103–111, 1985.[Medline]
  47. Fox PD, Khaw PT, McBride BW, McGill JI, Ward KA. Tear and serum antibody levels in ocular herpetic infection: Diagnostic precision of secretory IgA. Br J Ophthalmol 70:584–588, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Metcalf JF, Kaufman HE, Herpetic stromal keratitis: Evidence for cell-mediated immunopathogenesis. Am J Ophthalmol 82:827–834, 1976.[Medline]
  49. Metcalf JF, Hamilton DS, Reichert RW. Herpetic keratitis in athymic (nude) mice. Infect Immunol 26:1164–1171, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Tullo AB, Shimeld C, Blyth WA, Hill TJ, Easty DL. Spread of virus and distribution of latent infection following ocular herpes simplex in the non-immune and immune mouse. J Gen Virol 63:95–101, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Metcalf JF, Whitley RJ. Protective immunity against herpetic ocular disease in an outbred mouse model. Curr Eye Res 6:167–171, 1987.[Medline]
  52. Su Y-H, Oakes JE, Lausch RN. Ocular avirulence of a herpes simplex virus type 1 strain is associated with heightened sensitivity to alpha/beta interferon. J Virol 64:2187–2192, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Hendricks RL, Tumpey TM, Finnegan A. IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 are protective in the skin but pathologic in the corneas of HSV-1-infected mice. J Immunol 149:3023–3028, 1992.[Abstract]
  54. Tang Q, Chen W, Hendricks RL. Proinflammatory functions of IL-2 in herpes simplex virus corneal infection. J Immunol 158:1275–1283, 1997.[Abstract]
  55. Bishop GA, Kumel G, Schwartz SA, Glorioso JC. Specificity of human natural killer cells in limiting dilution culture for determinants of herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoproteins. J Virol 57:294–300, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Bishop GA, McCurry L, Schwartz SA, Glorioso JC. Activation of human natural killer cells by herpes simplex virus type 1-infected cells. Intervirology 28:7–88, 1987.
  57. Biron CA, Byron KS, Sullivan JL. Severe herpesvirus infections in an adolescent without natural killer cells. Med Intelligence 320:1731–1736, 1989.
  58. Morahan PS, Morse SS, McGeorge MB. Macrophage extrinsic antiviral activity during herpes simplex virus infection. J Gen Virol 46:291–300, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Hayashi K, Kurata T, Morishima T, Nassery T. Analysis of the inhibitory effect of peritoneal macrophages on the spread of herpes simplex virus. Infect Immunol 28:350–358, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Morse SS, Morahan PS. Activated macrophages mediate interferon-independent inhibition of herpes simplex virus. Cell Immunol 58:72–84, 1981.[Medline]
  61. Kohl S, Loo LS. Use of interleukin-2 and macrophages to treat herpes simplex virus infection in neonatal mice. J Infect Dis 157:1187–1192, 1988.[Medline]
  62. Kohl S, Loo LS, Drath DB, Cox P. Interleukin-2 protects neonatal mice from lethal herpes simplex virus infection: A macrophage-mediated, {gamma}-interferon-induced mechanism. J Infect Dis 159:239–247, 1989.[Medline]
  63. Nagy RM, McFall RC, Sery TW. Cell-mediated immunity in herpes corneal stromal disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19:271–277, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Newell CK, Martin S, Sendele D, Mercadal CM, Rouse BT. Herpes simplex virus-induced stromal keratitis: Role of T-lymphocyte subsets in immunopathology. J Virol 63:769–775, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Newell CK, Sendele D, Rouse BT. Effects of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte depletion on the induction and expression of herpes simplex stromal keratitis. Regional Immunol 2:366–369, 1989.[Medline]
  66. Doymaz MZ, Foster CM, Destephano D, Rouse BT. MHC II-restricted, CD4+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for herpes simplex virus-1: Implications for the development of herpetic stromal keratitis in mice. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 61:398–409, 1991.[Medline]
  67. Niemialtowski MG, Rouse BT. Predominance of Th1 cells in ocular tissues during herpetic stromal keratitis. J Immunol 149:3035–3039, 1992.[Abstract]
  68. Jayaraman S, Heiligenhaus A, Rodriguez A, Soukiasian S, Dorf ME, Foster CS. Exacerbation of murine herpes simplex virus-mediated stromal keratitis by Th2 type T cells. J Immunol 151:5777–5789, 1993.[Abstract]
  69. Mercadal CM, Bouley DM, DeStaphano D, Rouse BT. Herpetic stromal keratitis in the reconstituted scid mouse model. J Virol 67:3404–3408, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Heiligenhaus A, Berra A, Foster CF. CD4+ Vß8+ T cells mediate herpes stroma