EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Toft, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Toft, D. O.
Experimental Biology and Medicine 228:111-133 (2003)
© 2003 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


MINIREVIEW

Regulation of Signaling Protein Function and Trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-Based Chaperone Machinery1

William B. Pratt* and David O. Toft{dagger}

* Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; and
{dagger} Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Graduate School, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at Reprint requests should be addressed to either author. William B. Pratt at Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 MSRB III, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–0632. David O. Toft at Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905–0001. E-mail: toft{at}mayo.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Structure/Function Relationships...
 Receptor•hsp90...
 Immunophilins, hsp90, and...
 Speculations on Signal...
 References
 
Nearly 100 proteins are known to be regulated by hsp90. Most of these substrates or ‘‘client proteins’’ are involved in signal transduction, and they are brought into complex with hsp90 by a multiprotein hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. In addition to binding substrate proteins at the chaperone site(s), hsp90 binds cofactors at other sites that are part of the heterocomplex assembly machinery as well as immunophilins that connect assembled substrate•hsp90 complexes to protein-trafficking systems. In the 5 years since we last reviewed this subject, much has been learned about hsp90 structure, nucleotide-binding, and cochaperone interactions; the most important concept is that ATP hydrolysis by an intrinsic ATPase activity results in a conformational change in hsp90 that is required to induce conformational change in a substrate protein. The conformational change induced in steroid receptors is an opening of the steroid-binding cleft so that it can be accessed by steroid. We have now developed a minimal system of five purified proteins—hsp90, hsp70, Hop, hsp40, and p23— that assembles stable receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes. An hsp90•Hop•hsp70•hsp40 complex opens the cleft in an ATP-dependent process to produce a receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex with hsp90 in its ATP-bound conformation, and p23 then interacts with the hsp90 to stabilize the complex. Stepwise assembly experiments have shown that hsp70 and hsp40 first interact with the receptor in an ATP-dependent reaction to produce a receptor•hsp70•hsp40 complex that is ‘‘primed’’ to be activated to the steroid-binding state in a second ATP-dependent step with hsp90, Hop, and p23. Successful use of the five-protein system with other substrates indicates that it can assemble signal protein•hsp90 heterocomplexes whether the substrate is a receptor, a protein kinase, or a transcription factor. This purified system should facilitate understanding of how eukaryotic hsp70 and hsp90 work together as essential components of a process that alters the conformations of substrate proteins to states that respond in signal transduction.

Key Words: hsp90 • chaperone proteins • signal transduction • steroid receptors • protein trafficking • protein kinases


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Structure/Function Relationships...
 Receptor•hsp90...
 Immunophilins, hsp90, and...
 Speculations on Signal...
 References
 
Hsp90 is a highly conserved and essential stress protein that is expressed in all eukaryotic cells. Despite being a heat-shock protein, hsp90 is one of the most abundant proteins in unstressed cells (1–2% of cytosolic protein), where it performs housekeeping functions controlling the activity, turnover, and trafficking of a variety of proteins. Most of the hsp90-regulated proteins that have been discovered to date are involved in signal transduction. We reviewed the regulation of signal transduction by hsp90 in 1997 (1, 2), and in the intervening 5 years, the number of established substrates or ‘‘client proteins’’ that are regulated by hsp90 has tripled (Fig. 1Go). In most cases, these proteins have been shown by coimmunoadsorption to exist in cytosolic heterocomplexes with hsp90. In a number of cases, variation in hsp90 expression or hsp90 mutation has been shown to impair signaling via the protein or to impair a specific function of the protein (e.g., steroid binding, kinase activity) in vivo. Ansamycin antibiotics, such as geldanamycin and radicicol, inhibit hsp90 function (3), and treatment of cells with these inhibitors alters the function and/or turnover of hsp90-bound proteins, providing a rapid means of screening for hsp90-regulated targets.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Cumulative number of ‘‘substrate’’ or ‘‘client’’ proteins reported bound to and/or regulated by hsp90. pp60v-src, the first hsp90-bound protein, was reported in 1981, and steroid receptor binding to hsp90 was reported in 1985. Geldanamycin was shown to be an inhibitor of hsp90 in 1994, and it has been in general use for rapid identification of hsp90 substrates since 1997. Proteins bound to Grp94 are not included, and all homologs of a protein are considered as a single protein.

 
In Tables I–IIIGoGoGo, we provide a comprehensive listing of the hsp90-bound proteins identified to date. With the exception of actin and tubulin, where cytoskeleton-associated proteins are likely responsible for the linkage, direct interaction of the substrate with the chaperone site(s) in hsp90 is likely and in many cases proven. These substrate•hsp90 heterocomplexes are formed in an ATP-dependent process by a multiprotein hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery that is ubiquitous among cells of the animal and plant kingdoms (1, 2). Tables I–IIIGoGoGo do not include proteins such as MyoD (4) and calponin (5), for which hsp90 effects have been demonstrated with chaperone fragments in systems without ATP and hsp70. The relevance of in vitro passive chaperoning assays, such as the ATP-independent inhibition of enzyme aggregation by hsp90, to the formation of signaling protein•hsp90 complexes in vivo is unclear. Thus, the proteins reactivated in these assays are not included in Tables I–IIIGoGoGo as relevant substrates, and these passive chaperone effects are reviewed elsewhere (6).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Hsp90-Bound Transcription Factors and Polymerases
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Signaling Protein Kinases Bound to Hsp90
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Other Proteins Bound to Hsp90
 
As a reflection of the increasing interest in hsp90, several reviews have been published since 1997. A review by Csermely et al. (7) is comprehensive, and other reviews focus on hsp90 structure (810), studies of chaperone function in yeast (11, 12), hsp90 in plants (13), hsp70/hsp90 in protein folding versus degradation (14), hsp90 chaperoning and signal transduction (15), steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes (1618), geldanamycin/radicicol inhibition of hsp90 (1922), and the role of chaperones in receptor trafficking through the cytoplasm (23, 24) and within the nucleus (25). Despite the many proteins that are known to be regulated by hsp90 in vivo (Tables I–IIIGoGoGo), it is not known how they are regulated, and most of these reviews contain considerable speculation regarding the mechanism of hsp90 action. To limit redundancy, in this review we update our studies of hsp90 and hsp90-bound cofactors (e.g., Hop, p23, immunophilins) as they relate to steroid receptor function and trafficking.

Although the first to be recognized as an hsp90 substrate was pp60v-src (26, 27), hsp90 has been studied most extensively in relation to steroid receptors. The study of hsp90 effects on steroid receptors has provided a number of unique contributions to our understanding of this important participant in many signal transduction pathways:

  1. Several of the steroid receptors (e.g., glucocorticoid receptors) must be bound to hsp90 to have high-affinity steroid-binding activity, and in cell-free systems of receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly, the steroid-binding form is generated, providing an in vitro assay of hsp90 action that is clearly relevant to hsp90 action in vivo.
  2. The study of steroid receptor•hsp90 assembly by reticulocyte lysate led to the discovery of p23 and to the concept that hsp90 and hsp70 work together as multiprotein machinery with the hsp-organizing protein Hop.
  3. The receptor•hsp90 assembly system of reticulocyte lysate has now been resolved into a minimal system of five purified proteins—hsp90, hsp70, Hop, hsp40, and p23—that efficiently work together to produce receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes with steroid-binding activity.
  4. The purification of this five-protein system has permitted mechanistic study to define several steps in the assembly of receptor•hsp90•immunophilin complexes, starting with two sequential ATP-dependent events involving first hsp70 and then hsp90.
  5. Because the chaperone machinery opens up a hydrophobic steroid-binding cleft to access by ligand, the action of hsp90 as part of the multiprotein machinery is quite different from that of hsp90 acting alone in vitro to promote reactivation of partially denatured enzymes.
  6. The three hsp90-binding TPR domain immunophilins—FKBP52, FKBP51, and CyP-40—were discovered as components of steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes.
  7. The study of steroid-mediated glucocorticoid receptor translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus led to the discovery that the TPR domain immunophilins link hsp90 to a dynein motor protein.

It is clear from these findings that in an approach to hsp90 function from the standpoint of understanding the molecular endocrinology of hormone action, observations made on glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and progesterone receptor (PR) assembly into heterocomplexes with hsp90 have led us to some mechanistic conclusions and speculations that are quite different from those derived from studies on cell stress and protein chaperoning. It seems likely that hsp90 is assembled into complexes with all of the signaling proteins in Tables I–IIIGoGoGo by the same multiprotein machinery that regulates steroid receptor function (28). Thus, the mechanism of steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly discussed in this review may suggest some broad principles as to how hsp90 affects the function of a wide variety of regulatory proteins regardless of their structure or sequence. It is usually thought that, to be a substrate for hsp90 or hsp70, a protein must be partially unfolded, thus exposing hydrophobic regions that are the sites for chaperone binding. However, there is no indication that steroid receptors that have been stripped of hsp90 by mild salt treatment are in any way denatured before their reactivation by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. When hsp90 and hsp70 are acting together, we find that there is a very focal site of attack on the GR that lies on the surface of the ligand-binding domain at the opening of the hydrophobic steroid-binding cleft (29, 30). It is not yet clear whether the chaperone machinery has the general ability to recognize cleft openings on other signaling proteins. However, such regions are a general topologic feature of virtually all proteins in native conformation, and one must seriously consider the possibility that the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery functions on proteins in their native conformations rather than promoting refolding of partially denatured proteins. Whether the example of focal recognition of steroid receptors by the hsp90/hsp70-based machinery will extend to other proteins whose function is regulated by hsp90 is unknown. However, we hope that the following update of how this machinery works on steroid receptors will prove to be heuristic for investigators working with other regulatory systems.


    Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Structure/Function Relationships...
 Receptor•hsp90...
 Immunophilins, hsp90, and...
 Speculations on Signal...
 References
 
The substrate, or client, proteins for hsp90 (Tables I–IIIGoGoGo) are bound to its chaperone site(s). The location and number of substrate-binding sites on hsp90 are still uncertain. However, hsp90 may be unusual in that it appears to contain two independent chaperone sites that differ in their substrate specificity (137, 138), an observation that may ultimately be important for understanding the mechanism by which the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery opens the ligand-binding cleft in steroid receptors. As summarized in Table IVGo, there are a variety of other protein interaction sites on hsp90 that are important for binding components of the heterocomplex assembly machinery or proteins that bind after the heterocomplexes are formed, such as immunophilins in the case of steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes or p50cdc37 in the case of protein kinase•hsp90 heterocomplexes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Proteins That Bind Directly to Hsp90 at Sites Other Than the Substrate Site(s)
 
Hsp70 is required for the assembly of signaling protein•hsp90 heterocomplexes, and these two chaperones likely interact directly with each other while opening the steroid-binding cleft in the GR (164). Mammalian hsp90s and hsp70s do not form complexes that are stable enough to be detected by the usual biochemical separation techniques (1), but hsp80, the hsp90 homolog of Neurospora crassa, binds directly to hsp70 to form a complex that survives routine separation procedures (139), and direct interaction of mammalian hsp70 with hsp90 has been shown by cross-linking (140). It is not known where hsp70 binds to hsp90, but one of the two chaperone sites identified by in vitro experiments (137, 138) is a potential hsp70 interaction site.

p23 is a widely distributed acidic 23-kDa protein (141) that binds only to the ATP-dependent conformation of hsp90 (165) to stabilize receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes once they are formed and the receptor has been converted to the steroid-binding state (166). The p23-binding domain on hsp90 has not been identified, but it is known that p23 binding requires regions outside the 1–221 domain containing the nucleotide/geldanamycin-binding site (167, 205).

The third component of the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery that directly contacts hsp90 is a 60-kDa protein called Hop (hsp-organizing protein) (144). Hop binds independently via an N-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain to hsp70 and via a central TPR domain to hsp90 (168, 169) to bring the two chaperones together in an hsp90•Hop•hsp70•hsp40 machinery that opens the GR steroid-binding cleft (170, 171). Hop binds to a TPR acceptor site that is located at the C-terminus of hsp90 (172175), and Hop and the TPR domain immunophilins compete with each other for binding to this common acceptor site (156, 173, 176178). For some of the immunophilins, such as CyP-40 and FKBP51, sequences upstream and/or downstream of the TPR domain are also important for stable binding to hsp90 (177, 179), but for FKBP52, the TPR domain alone is sufficient. A mutational study of protein phosphatase 5 binding to hsp90 indicates that interactions between basic residues in a binding groove on one face of the TPR domain and acidic residues in the acceptor site on hsp90 are important for stable binding (175). Hsp90 functions as a dimer (1), and the dimerization domain is located within the TPR acceptor site (172, 174, 204).

The number of TPR acceptor sites per hsp90 dimer is somewhat controversial. Studies of saturation binding of Hop to hsp90 dimer (173) and cross-linking of hsp90•FKBP52 complexes (180) are consistent with one TPR-binding site per hsp90 dimer. However, isothermal titration calorimetry studies of hsp90 binding by yeast Cpr6 and Sti1 (181) and by mammalian CyP-40, FKBP51, and FKBP52 (182) are consistent with binding of two molecules of TPR protein to an hsp90 dimer. Deletion of amino acids 661–677 of chicken hsp90 eliminates dimerization, and the resulting hsp90 monomers bind FKBP52 weakly with respect to the wild-type hsp90 dimer (172). Thus, we favor the model in which each hsp90 monomer contains a half-site that is sufficient for low-affinity TPR binding, and a single higher affinity TPR acceptor site is created by dimerization. In a series of cross-linking studies, Gehring and his colleagues determined a heterotetrameric structure of 1 receptor:2 hsp90:1 immunophilin for glucocorticoid, estrogen, and progesterone receptors (reviewed in Ref. 1). It has also been shown that CyP-40 and FKBP52 exist in separate GR•hsp90 heterocomplexes (176, 183). Thus, the presence of one TPR acceptor site per hsp90 dimer is consistent with all of the observations on native steroid receptor heterocomplexes, and a two-site model is not.

Another TPR protein that interacts with hsp90 is CHIP (carboxy terminus of hsc70-interacting protein). CHIP is a 35-kDa protein that was originally shown in yeast two-hybrid and in vitro experiments to bind via its amino-terminal TPR domain to both hsc70 and hsp70 (184). Subsequently, it was shown that when reticulocyte lysate was incubated with CHIP and hsp90 was immunoadsorbed, CHIP was coimmunoadsorbed, Hop binding to hsp90 was decreased, and p23 binding was eliminated (160). This is consistent with CHIP binding to the TPR acceptor site on hsp90 and somehow keeping hsp90 in its ADP-dependent conformation, which does not bind p23. GR translated in the presence of CHIP does not achieve the steroid-binding state (160), but that likely reflects CHIP inhibition of hsp70 interaction with the GR before hsp90 can act in the heterocomplex assembly pathway. Thus, it is not totally clear what CHIP’s interaction with hsp90 does to the GR.

CHIP possesses a carboxy-terminal U-box that interacts with the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme family (185), and CHIP promotes GR ubiquitylation (160). But it has not been totally sorted out whether it is only CHIP binding to GR-bound hsp70 that targets the GR for ubiquitylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation or whether CHIP can also bind to GR-bound hsp90 and target the receptor for ubiquitylation. Thus, at this moment, it is clear that CHIP is a very interesting regulator of hsp70 function, targeting hsp70 itself (185) and hsp70 substrates, such as the GR (160), for proteasomal degradation. CHIP has been found in GR•hsp90 heterocomplexes (160), but hsp90 that is bound to steroid-binding receptors is in its ATP-bound conformation, and it seems unlikely that CHIP would bind to this hsp90 and target degradation of this form of the receptor. It should be noted, however, that receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes are dynamically undergoing disassembly and being reassembled by the hsp90/hsp70-dependent machinery (1, 240); thus, receptor•hsp70 complexes are constantly being formed as targets for CHIP action.

When src•hsp90 heterocomplexes were first identified, they were found to contain a 50-kDa phosphoprotein (26, 27) that was subsequently cloned and shown to be a mammalian homolog of the yeast cell cycle control protein cdc37 (186, 187). p50cdc37 is not a TPR protein, and it binds directly to hsp90 (161, 186) at a site that is different from the TPR acceptor site (188). p50cdc37 has been recovered with a number of mammalian protein kinase•hsp90 heterocomplexes, and studies in yeast and Drosophila have shown that mutations in cdc37 impair signaling via several protein kinases, including v-Src (189), cdc28 (190), MPS1 (191), CDK-Kin28p (192), and the sevenless receptor tyrosine kinase (73). The mechanism by which p50cdc37/cdc37 affects the kinases is not known (23, 193), but it is clearly quite kinase selective. GR•hsp90 heterocomplexes, for example, contain TPR proteins, but they do not contain p50cdc37 (80, 161), whereas immune-isolated src•hsp90 (194), cdk4•hsp90 (186), and raf•hsp90 (80) heterocomplexes contain p50cdc37 and are essentially devoid of TPR proteins. p50cdc37 has been shown to bind directly to cdk4 (186) and to the catalytic domain of raf (188); thus, the kinases can select for its presence in their heterocomplexes.

The specificity of TPR proteins for receptors and of p50cdc37 for protein kinases is apparently not absolute. Mutation in CDC37 in yeast, for example, affects the ligand-binding activity of the androgen receptor (195), and cdc37 interacts with the AR but not the GR ligand-binding domain (196). Also, raf•hsp90 immune pellets can bind a small amount of [3H]FK506, suggesting the existence of a few raf•hsp90•FKBP complexes (197). Nevertheless, a general model in which p50cdc37 is predominantly associated with protein kinase substrates of hsp90 in native heterocomplexes stands on a solid body of evidence. In contrast to native complexes, assembly of raf•hsp90 heterocomplexes in vitro using reticulocyte lysate yields both raf•hsp90•FKBP52 and raf•hsp90•p50cdc37 complexes (80). This may reflect the dynamic nature of the reticulocyte lysate system, resulting in inadequate time for the hsp90-bound kinase to select for the preferred binding partner, p50cdc37.

Although the function of p50cdc37 is not known, it has often been proposed that it targets hsp90 to protein kinases. It should be noted that GR, PR, and raf heterocomplexes have been assembled with the purified five-protein system in the absence of immunophilins or p50cdc37; thus, neither protein family is required for formation of heterocomplexes with hsp90.

The number and location of p50cdc37 acceptor sites on hsp90 are not resolved. Unpublished observations from cross-linking of hsp90•p50cdc37 complexes are consistent with one binding site per hsp90 dimer (A.M. Silverstein, personal communication). In vitro binding studies in the Pratt lab showed competition of intact TPR proteins for binding of p50cdc37 and competition of p50cdc37 for binding of Hop to hsp90 (178, 188). However, a TPR domain fragment that blocked the binding of the TPR proteins did not compete for binding of p50cdc37. This suggests that p50cdc37 binds outside the TPR acceptor site on hsp90 but that the p50cdc37 acceptor site is close enough to the TPR acceptor site on the surface of hsp90 that p50cdc37 and a TPR protein cannot be bound at the same time (188). The question of whether p50cdc37 binds to hsp90 in a manner that is exclusive or nonexclusive with respect to TPR proteins is subject to some contention. Silverstein et al. (188) reported that immunoadsorption of TPR proteins from reticulocyte lysate did not yield coadsorption of p50cdc37. In contrast, Hartson et al. (198) reported that p50cdc37 coadsorbed with FKBP52, CyP-40, and Hop and concluded that both are bound simultaneously to the same hsp90 dimer. Obviously, these two models are mutually exclusive, and further work is required to determine which is correct. Ultimately, it will have to be explained why no p50cdc37 has been recovered in native glucocorticoid, progesterone, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor•hsp90•immunophilin heterocomplexes and why little or no TPR protein has been recovered in native protein kinase•hsp90•p50cdc37 heterocomplexes. At this juncture, the exclusive binding model explains those observations, and the nonexclusive model does not.


    Structure/Function Relationships in hsp90 Action
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Structure/Function Relationships...
 Receptor•hsp90...
 Immunophilins, hsp90, and...
 Speculations on Signal...
 References
 
The complex nature of hsp90 action is evident not only from the multitude of cochaperones or partner proteins that participate in its activities but also from the intramolecular interactions and conformational transitions that direct its functioning. Recent studies indicate these complexities, but they are only partially understood. Three aspects of hsp90 function that concern the importance of conformational transitions are briefly reviewed here.

Nucleotide Interactions.
The most conserved domain of hsp90, and the best understood, is the nucleotide-binding pocket near the N-terminus, approximately residues 1–220 (Fig. 2Go). Both biochemical and crystallographic studies show this to be the binding site for ATP and ADP and also the site of action for the hsp90 inhibitors geldanamycin and radicicol (167, 199, 200). This ATP-binding site is structurally unique and identifies hsp90 as a member of a small family of proteins, the GHKL family, having related binding pockets for ATP (201). The other members include bacterial DNA gyrase, the DNA repair protein MutL, and several bacterial histidine kinases. These proteins are unrelated in function, but they all require ATP binding and ATPase or phosphotransferase activity in their functions. Although they share little sequence identity in their ATP-binding domains, they contain four common motifs that define a ‘‘Bergerat fold’’ for binding ATP (201, 202). In all cases, ATP binding and hydrolysis are used to regulate the conformational states of the proteins during their activities. With hsp90, the binding of ATP induces dimer interaction near the N-terminus domains of the hsp90 homodimer (203). These interactions are in addition to the constitutive dimer interactions near the C-terminus (204). It has been suggested that the N-terminus domains act as a ‘‘molecular clamp’’ during the chaperoning functions of hsp90 (203). Although conformational transitions in this region of hsp90 clearly occur, it is surprising that the amino termini of hsp90 can be restricted with a minimal effect on its activity. When the N-terminal domains of hsp90 are forced together by fusion with the dimeric protein glutathione-S-transferase, this fusion protein is quite capable of chaperoning the progesterone receptor to its active state (205).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The organization of domains of hsp90. Bar A shows two highly charged regions on hsp90 (±) and two hypersensitive sites for trypsin cleavage (arrows) (260). The major region for dimer interaction is near the C-terminus that ends in the sequence MEEVD. Shown in Bar B are the binding domains for the cochaperone p23 and the TPR-containing proteins (TPR) such as Hop and the immunophilins. Bar C shows an N-terminal ATP and geldanamycin (GA)-binding region and a second potential ATP-binding site at the C-terminus. Each of these regions may also participate in binding of substrate (Sub).

 
Hsp90 also has a weak ATPase activity that is essential to its biologic functions (206208). However, this ATPase activity is not exhibited by the nucleotide-binding pocket per se (residues 1–220) but requires additional downstream residues that have not yet been clearly defined. A highly charged region directly adjacent to the binding pocket is probably not needed for ATPase activity because this region is absent in hsp90 homologs from bacteria and mitochondria. However, beyond this region, there are residues that are thought to interact with the {gamma} phosphate of ATP during ATP hydrolysis, as has been shown for other members of the GHKL family (201, 209, 210). Downstream residues are also needed for the tight, committed binding of ATP to hsp90 that appears to precede ATP hydrolysis (211). C-terminal truncation mutants of yeast hsp90 show greatly reduced ATPase activity, suggesting that residues near the C-terminus are required either directly or indirectly by promoting dimer formation (203, 211). That dimer interactions are important for ATPase activity is supported by studies with yeast hsp90 mutants and with mixed dimers of wild-type and mutant hsp90 (209). On the other hand, a monomer fragment from chicken hsp90 (residues 1–573) has been shown to be active (212). This fragment actually has a much greater ATPase activity than full-length hsp90, which suggests the presence of a region beyond residue 573 that suppresses ATPase activity. This supports a model in which the ATPase activity is suppressed until hsp90 assumes a conformational state in which ATPase activity is needed for the next transition. Thus, it is likely that the binding of client proteins and cochaperones modulates the ATPase activity of hsp90. In a study by McLaughlin et al. (277), the ATPase activity of human hsp90 could be stimulated by the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor. They found that the cochaperones Hop and p23 suppressed this ATPase activity. In the absence of a client protein, the ATPase activity of hsp90 can be inhibited by Hop but not by p23 (181, 213).

Although the binding of ATP and ADP to hsp90 is now well established, this was a controversial issue for several years because this low-affinity nucleotide binding was hard to demonstrate. Surprisingly, recent studies indicate the presence of yet another nucleotide-binding site near the C-terminus of hsp90 (210, 214, 215). This site is not obvious by sequence analysis and is evident only under certain conditions. It appears to be suppressed, but binding at this site can be measured if the N-terminal site is occupied by nucleotide or if that site is inactivated by certain mutations. The C-terminal site can also be activated by deletion of the N-terminal site, but only if the adjacent charged region is also removed (214). On the other hand, binding of the drug novobiocin to the C-terminal site blocks nucleotide binding at the N-terminal site. Thus, these two nucleotide-binding sites appear to interact in a coordinated fashion that is presumably important for regulating the conformational state of hsp90. The purpose of this second site is not known, but it appears to be inhibited by novobiocin and by cisplatin, and these agents should be quite helpful in functional studies (210, 214).

Cochaperone Interactions.
Two types of cochaperone interactions have been described for hsp90. Several proteins that contain TPR domains have been shown to bind near the C-terminus of hsp90 (Fig. 2Go), and it appears that these proteins compete for the same site or overlapping sites on hsp90 (156, 173, 176178). The binding of Hop to hsp90 occurs transiently within an intermediate complex for chaperoning hsp90 targets. Although one purpose of Hop is to physically link the activities of hsp70 with hsp90, Hop also appears to modulate the activities of these chaperones. Hop can enhance the activity of hsp70 in chaperoning protein folding in the absence of hsp90 (216). Hop has been reported to stimulate nucleotide exchange by hsp70 (217); however, this effect was not observed in another study (216), and the mechanism of Hop’s influence on hsp70 function remains unknown. Hop binds selectively to hsp70 in its ADP-bound state, suggesting that it may modulate hsp70 when it is bound to a substrate protein (216).

Hop also influences the functioning of hsp90. As noted above, its binding blocks ATP binding and the ATPase activity of hsp90 (181, 277), and this very effectively inhibits the binding of the cochaperone p23 to hsp90, which requires hsp90 in its ATP-bound state (216). Based on these results, one might speculate that Hop, perhaps in complexes with hsp90, would interact specifically with hsp70 that has formed a complex with a target protein or substrate. The hsp90 in this complex would not interact with ATP, and this may be important for inducing hsp90 into a substrate-binding state (see below) and for preventing premature entry of other TPR proteins or p23 into the complex.

The binding of p23 to hsp90 occurs late in the hsp90-chaperoning pathway when hsp90 has apparently dissociated from Hop and can assume an ATP-bound conformation. This binding can be demonstrated in isolation, but it requires elevated temperature and the presence of ATP and molybdate or a nonhydrolyzable analog of ATP (165). Molybdate stabilizes the ATP-bound conformation of hsp90, but the mechanism for this effect is still uncertain (165, 218). The site of p23 binding on hsp90 has been described to some extent. The p23 binding apparently involves the primary ATP-binding domain (residues 1–220), but this alone is not sufficient (167, 205). Because the p23–hsp90 interaction is very conformation dependent, many diverse mutations of hsp90 exhibit a loss of p23-binding activity. Recent studies show that an hsp90 fragment, residues 1–490, is able to bind p23, but only if it is prepared as a fusion protein to form a dimer (205). Thus, p23 binding involves the N-terminal ATP-binding site plus a downstream domain, all in a dimer arrangement. The charged domain within this region can be deleted without loss of p23 binding.

The function of p23 is still unclear. p23 is able to inhibit the aggregation of denatured proteins, and this passive chaperoning activity may be used to chaperone substrates in hsp90 complexes (219, 220). Alternatively, this chaperoning activity might be focused specifically on hsp90, where it may facilitate conformational changes. p23 appears to stabilize hsp90 complexes with steroid receptors and to enhance the proportion of complexes that are in a ‘‘mature’’ state, where the steroid receptor has hormone-binding activity (166). Young and Hartl have recently proposed that p23 may function in the ATP-dependent dissociation of hsp90–substrate complexes (213). Finally, Freeman et al. have shown that p23 can influence the biologic activity of steroid receptors after their activation by hormone, suggesting that p23 may affect target proteins after their release from hsp90 (221).

Hsp90–Substrate Interactions.
Very little is known regarding the mechanism through which hsp90 binds to substrates or client proteins. How does hsp90 select its substrates? What are the structural and chemical requirements for this interaction? Where is the substrate-binding site on hsp90, and how is the activity of this process regulated? These questions remain unanswered mainly because of the complexities of the process. Hsp90 is unable to bind biologic substrates such as steroid receptors on its own and requires the assistance of several other proteins. With steroid receptors, it is evident that the simple binding of hsp90 is not sufficient to achieve a conformational state able to bind hormone. An additional step requiring ATP and enhanced by p23 is needed, suggesting that there is more than one step in the substrate-binding process. One possibility is that there are multiple sites for substrate binding to hsp90. In this regard, two regions of hsp90, one near the N-terminus and one near the C-terminus, have been shown to prevent the aggregation of denatured proteins (137, 138). It has been suggested from these results that these activities represent domains for substrate binding, and thus, hsp90 may have two substrate-binding sites per monomer. However, in another study, a middle region of hsp90 was also shown to have this antiaggregation activity, and the significance of this activity and the actual location of substrate binding domains on hsp90 remain uncertain (222).

Purified hsp90 and its homolog in the endoplasmic reticulum, GRP94 (gp96), show a weak and inefficient interaction with a variety of peptides (223226). In this regard, GRP94 has been studied more extensively because of its involvement in antigen processing and its potential use in immune therapy (223, 227, 228). Although GRP94 binds peptides poorly in its purified native state, binding activity can be artificially enhanced by heating the protein at high temperature (e.g., 50°C) that also promotes oligomerization, or by a cycle of denaturation and renaturation using guanidine hydrochloride (224, 225, 229). It is possible that these perturbations simply generate a partially denatured protein that can interact nonspecifically with proteins and peptides, and these treatments may open a substrate-binding site on GRP94 that is normally suppressed. In one study, the peptide-binding site was identified by cross-linking to be near the C-terminus of GRP94 (229). More recently, the binding of the hydrophobic ligand bis-ANS has been shown to enhance peptide binding to GRP94 (230). From these results, it has been suggested that GRP94 can exist in an open and a closed conformation with respect to peptide binding (224). The protein would normally exist in the closed state but could be induced to open by specific events such as contact with a particular type of substrate or interaction with specific cochaperones that help to control or organize the GRP94 (or hsp90) chaperoning process. The mechanisms that control the opening of GRP94 and hsp90 binding sites remain unknown. In a recent study, Zhao et al. (259) presented evidence that the binding of hsp90 to the {sigma}1 protein of reovirus is accompanied by a cycle of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of hsp90. Greater effort is needed to pursue this and other leads toward understanding the mechanisms for the binding of substrates to hsp90 and the regulation of this key function.


    Receptor•hsp90 Heterocomplex Assembly
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Structure/Function Relationships...
 Receptor•hsp90...
 Immunophilins, hsp90, and...
 Speculations on Signal...
 References
 
In our original studies of cell-free assembly of steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes, immunoadsorbed GR or PR that was salt-stripped of hsp90 was incubated with rabbit reticulocyte lysate, and the receptors became complexed with rabbit hsp90 (235, 236). Because the GR must be bound to hsp90 to have steroid-binding activity, and because steroid-binding activity was generated by reticulocyte lysate in direct proportion to the number of GR•hsp90 heterocomplexes assembled (237), it was clear that the heterocomplexes that were assembled in lysate were functionally the same as native complexes isolated from cytosols. Receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly by reticulocyte lysate was shown to be temperature-dependent and to require ATP, Mg2+, a monovalent cation (e.g., K+), and hsp70 (237239). Two other proteins found in PR•hsp90 heterocomplexes assembled in reticulocyte lysate were p23 (235) and the 60-kDa protein Hop (238). In examining the time course of PR•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly by reticulocyte lysate, Smith (240) showed that hsp70 and Hop were present in early complexes, but their levels declined after a few minutes, whereas p23 entered the complex somewhat later, with the amount remaining constant thereafter.

Heterocomplex Assembly Machinery.
Since the publication of our original review (1), the heterocomplex assembly system has been reconstituted (241), and it is now possible to assemble receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes with a minimal system of five purified proteins—hsp90, hsp70, Hop, hsp40, and p23 (171, 242). An overview of the assembly process is modeled in Fig. 3Go. All of the Hop in reticulocyte lysate is present in an hsp90•Hop•hsp70 complex with an apparent stoichiometry of 2:1:1 (140). About 30% of the hsp90 and 9% of the hsp70 in lysate are in these complexes. Hsp40, a cochaperone that binds to hsp70 and promotes its ATPase activity, is also present in these complexes (171), but the stoichiometry of hsp40 binding to other proteins in the complex is unknown. The hsp90 cochaperone p23 is not present in the hsp90•Hop•Hsp70•Hsp40 complex immunoadsorbed from lysate with an antibody against Hop (144, 166). This complex has been called a foldosome (243), but the resistance of reviewers to that term has led us to refer to it as the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Model of steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly. The hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery, or foldosome, converts the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) ligand-binding domain from a folded conformation in which the steroid-binding cleft is closed and not accessible to hormone to an open cleft conformation that can be accessed by steroid. Hop binds via independent tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains to hsp90 and hsp70 to form the foldosome machinery. Hsp90 functions as a dimer, and one Hop is bound to an hsp90 dimer. Hsp40 is an hsp70-bound cochaperone that is also present in the machinery that carries out the ATP/Mg2+-dependent and K+-dependent opening of the steroid-binding cleft. During cleft opening, hsp90 is converted to its ATP-dependent conformation, which is dynamically stabilized by p23, and Hop is released from hsp90. Thus, the complex shown at the end of Step 2 represents a composite in which several changes are occurring in dynamic fashion. The immunophilins (IMM) also bind to hsp90 via TPR domains (indicated by the solid black crescents), and when Hop exits the complex, an immunophilin can bind to the single TPR acceptor site on the receptor-bound hsp90 dimer. Some hsp70 also leaves the intermediate complex, and the broken line for hsp70 in the final heterocomplex indicates that it is present at substoichiometric levels with respect to the receptor.

 
The hsp90•Hop•hsp70•hsp40 complex is formed spontaneously on mixing of the purified proteins, and both the immunoadsorbed purified protein complex and the native complex from reticulocyte lysate convert the GR ligand-binding domain (LBD) to a steroid-binding state (166, 170, 171). In Figure 3Go, we show the receptor that interacts with this machinery as being in a folded state in which the hydrophobic steroid-binding cleft is closed and not accessible to steroid. It is known that steroid receptors completely envelop the ligand in a hydrophobic space that is large and appears to be altered or collapsed in the absence of ligand. Thus, the receptor must change its conformation to allow entry of the ligand (305). Hsp90 binds directly to the ligand-binding domain of the receptor (1) to promote conformational changes that, in addition to opening the cleft, cause enhanced sensitivity of the GR LBD to attack by thiol derivatizing agents and trypsin (244246). The site of hsp90 binding to the GR is unknown; however, a short segment of the receptor lying at the opening of the steroid-binding cleft in the N-terminus of the LBD is required for GR•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly (29, 30). When a GR fragment containing this segment is fused to the LBD of the retinoic acid receptor, the chimera is complexed with hsp90 and undergoes cytoplasmic–nuclear translocation in response to retinoic acid (247). This N-terminal region of the LBD is a likely site of interaction between the chaperone machinery and the GR.

To have an open steroid-binding cleft (as indicated in the complex produced by Step 2 in Fig. 3Go), the receptor-bound hsp90 must assume its ATP-dependent conformation (208). This is the conformation of hsp90 that is bound by p23 (165), and it is at this stage that p23 binds to receptor-bound hsp90 in quite dynamic fashion, stabilizing the GR•hsp90 heterocomplex (166). Although binding of p23 to purified hsp90 is ATP-dependent (165), p23 will stabilize GR•hsp90 heterocomplexes immunoadsorbed from cytosol without a requirement for ATP (166) because these native, final heterocomplexes are in the steroid-binding state and already have their receptor-bound hsp90 in the ATP-dependent conformation. In Figure 3Go, p23 is shown interacting with a steroid-binding intermediate complex containing Hop as well as with the Hop-free final heterocomplex. It is important for the reader to realize that the intermediate-stage product of Step 2 in the model does not reflect a single static state; rather, a series of events is occurring that depend on the multifunctional properties of the hsp90•Hop•hsp70•hsp40 complex. Binding to the GR is actually initiated by interactions with hsp70 and hsp40 as described below. As the cleft is opened on hsp90 binding, hsp90 achieves its ATP-bound conformation, Hop dissociates from the receptor-bound hsp90, and p23 binds to the ATP-bound hsp90. Hop, however, is still associated with the recep tor-bound hsp70 and must somehow exit the complex.

Exit of Hop and hsp70.
The exit of Hop from the intermediate complex formed in Step 2 frees the TPR acceptor site on hsp90 to bind TPR domain immunophilins such as FKBP52, FKBP51, PP5, or CyP-40. It is not clear how Hop exits the intermediate complexes. The affinity of Hop for both hsp70 and hsp90 is reduced when these proteins are in their ATP-bound states (216), and this may favor competing interactions by other TPR domain proteins. When receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes are assembled by reticulocyte lysate, there are few complexes containing Hop, and these are probably complexes that are in the process of assembly at the time of their isolation. Again, it is important to realize that this whole process is very dynamic (240) and that heterocomplex assembly and disassembly [by a mechanism that is not understood but appears to be promoted by ATP (166)] are occurring simultaneously. In contrast to native receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes or to those formed by reticulocyte lysate, heterocomplexes formed by the purified five-protein system contain substantial amounts of Hop (170). This suggests that reticulocyte lysate may have a factor (or factors) that promotes Hop release and is not present in the five-protein system, which is a minimal system for assembly of stable receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes. Reticulocyte lysate, for example, contains the hsp70 cochaperone BAG-1, which binds to the ATPase domain of hsp70 (248, 249) and promotes the release of ADP (250, 251). Hop binds preferentially to the ADP-bound form of hsp70 (216), and addition of physiologic amounts of purified BAG-1 to the five-protein assembly system results in GR•hsp90 heterocomplexes with less Hop (252). It is possible that BAG-1 plays a role in promoting Hop release in assembly systems that are more complex than the minimal five-protein system.

As indicated in Figure 3Go, some hsp70 is also released during the assembly process (240). Native receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes isolated from cell lysates may contain no hsp70, as is often the case with the GR, or considerable hsp70, as is always the case with the PR (1). In those cases where it has been measured, the stoichiometry of hsp70 in the final complex was found to be less than 1:1 with respect to the receptor (1). The factors that determine the amount of hsp70 in the final heterocomplex are unknown, but there is always hsp70 in GR•hsp90 and PR•hsp90 heterocomplexes assembled by the five-protein system.

Hip Is Not Required for Assembly.
A 48-kDa protein recovered in PR•hsp90 heterocomplexes early in their assembly by reticulocyte lysate (240) was subsequently found (253) to be the hsp70 cochaperone Hip (hsc70-interacting protein) discovered by Höhfeld et al. (254). Hip binds to the ATPase domain of hsp70, stabilizing the ADP state, which has a high affinity for nonnative substrate protein (254). Hip and BAG-1 compete with each other in binding to the hsp70 ATPase domain (250, 255). Hip was recovered in PR•hsp90 heterocomplexes assembled in the presence of a limiting amount of ATP or in the presence of geldanamycin (37, 253). This suggested that Hip might be a functional component for intermediate steps in the assembly process. Also, a mutant form of Hip was reported to inhibit PR•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly by reticulocyte lysate, leading to a model of assembly in which Hip was required for progression from early receptor complexes with hsp70 into later complexes containing hsp90 (256). For these reasons, in some reviews of the receptor•hsp90 assembly mechanism (8, 17), Hip is considered to be an important functional component. When this notion was tested using the purified five-protein system, GR•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly was unaffected by the addition of Hip (257). Addition of very large amounts of BAG-1 that are stoichiometric with respect to hsp70 inhibit GR•hsp90 assembly by the purified five-protein system, and overexpression of BAG-1 inhibits assembly in vivo (252). Hip counteracts BAG-1 inhibition both in the purified five-protein system and in vivo (257). Thus, Hip appears not to be essential for the assembly of receptor heterocomplexes, but it could play a regulatory role in opposition to BAG-1, or it may have another role that is not evident when the purified five-protein assembly system operates.

Essential versus Nonessential Chaperones.
The purified, five-protein system has permitted definition of essential versus nonessential chaperones for steroid-binding cleft opening and stable receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly. When either hsp70 or hsp90 is omitted from the purified system, no steroid-binding activity is generated (242, 258). In general, steroid receptor heterocomplexes are assembled at 30°C and then incubated on ice with steroid to determine steroid-binding activity. This procedure assays the formation of stable heterocomplexes that remain intact during subsequent incubation with steroid, and when p23 is omitted from the purified assembly system, no steroid-binding activity is generated in this assay (170, 242, 258). However, opening of steroid-binding clefts in the absence of p23 can be detected by having steroid present during the assembly reaction at 30°C. Under these conditions, as soon as the steroid-binding cleft is opened, the steroid enters, and generation of steroid binding shows that the appropriate conformational change in the receptor has occurred in the absence of p23 (166). In this assay, some steroid binding can be generated by hsp70 and hsp90 in the absence of the other three proteins, although the efficiency of the process is dramatically reduced (258). Neither hsp70 nor hsp90 has any activity alone, and both chaperone proteins must be present to produce steroid-binding activity (258). Thus, hsp70 and hsp90 are essential chaperones, and p23, which is required for production of stable receptor heterocomplexes, is a nonessential cochaperone for steroid-binding cleft opening. This is consistent with yeast studies showing that deletion of SBA1, which encodes the yeast p23 ortholog, does not affect dexamethasone-dependent activation of transcription (142, 143). Thus, the receptor can achieve a functional conformation in vivo in the absence of p23.

From studies in reticulocyte lysate, Hop was considered essential for formation of functional PR•hsp90 heterocomplexes (168, 240, 256, 261, 262), and immunodepletion of Hop from reticulocyte lysate markedly reduced its PR•hsp90 (262) and GR•hsp90 (241) heterocomplex assembly activity. However, when Hop was eliminated from the purified system, generation of steroid-binding sites for both the PR and GR was decreased ~60% during assembly for 30 min at 30°C (242, 258). It was found that the presence of Hop accelerates the rate at which GR steroid binding is generated, but in the absence of Hop, the other four proteins will continue to activate the receptor to approach the maximum level of steroid binding attained with Hop (258). Thus, the assembly system works faster when the essential chaperones are brought together by Hop, but Hop is a nonessential cochaperone for receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly. Hop is the mammalian ortholog of the nonessential yeast protein Sti1, and the Lindquist laboratory has shown that deletion of STI1 reduces but does not eliminate GR activity in vivo (263).

Instead of mammalian hsp40, we use the purified yeast ortholog YDJ-1 in our five-protein assembly system. The important role of a J protein in this system should not be deemphasized, but when YDJ-1 is omitted, there is still substantial generation of steroid-binding activity for both the PR and GR (242, 258). Thus, YDJ-1/hsp40 is also a nonessential cochaperone for opening of the steroid-binding cleft. Genetic studies in yeast support the notion that YDJ-1 is important but not essential for attaining the hormone-binding state in vivo. For example, yeast with a mutation in YDJ-1 and expressing glucocorticoid receptors still respond to steroid (265). The androgen receptor also requires hsp90 to achieve a high-affinity ligand-binding conformation (41, 264), and androgen receptors have some steroid-binding activity in YDJ-1 mutant yeast (266) and in yeast deleted for YDJ-1 (267).

Although hsp90 and hsp70 are together necessary and sufficient for opening the steroid-binding cleft (258, 269), the importance of the cochaperones for efficient receptor hetercomplex assembly should be emphasized. Some investigators have repudiated a model of machinery-mediated GR•hsp90 assembly as well as any role for Hop and YDJ-1/hsp40 in the assembly process (269). In our experience with both GR and PR heterocomplex assembly, addition of Hop and hsp40 has always yielded a substantial increase in the amount of steroid-binding activity that is generated (171, 241, 242, 258), and p23 is required for stable heterocomplexes.

Mechanism of Cleft Opening.
Early experiments on the time course of PR heterocomplex assembly indicated an ordered series of steps that are not shown in the model of Figure 3Go. In the earlier model of heterocomplex assembly, the PR first associated with an hsp90•Hop•hsp70 complex, and these proteins were then replaced by a p23•hsp90•immunophilin unit to yield the final receptor heterocomplex (253, 261, 270). This concept of one hsp90 complex being replaced by another hsp90 complex now seems to have been wrong. Stepwise assembly experiments with purified proteins are beginning to separate the cleft-opening process into an ordered series of events as diagramed in Figure 4Go. Two ATP-dependent steps have been resolved. In the first step, immunoadsorbed receptor is incubated with purified hsp70 and hsp40 (YDJ-1) in the presence of ATP (268, 271). This produces a receptor•hsp70•hsp40 complex that can be washed free of unbound hsp70 and hsp40 and then incubated with purified hsp90, Hop, and p23. In this first reaction, the receptor is ‘‘primed’’ to be activated by hsp90 during the second incubation. Both the initial priming step with hsp70 and the second activating step with hsp90 are ATP-dependent, and steroid-binding activity is generated only during the second step. Experiments are ongoing in both of our laboratories to understand the mechanisms of the priming and activating steps (164, 271, 272).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Mechanism by which hsp70 and hsp90 open the steroid-binding cleft. The mechanism is derived from stepwise assembly experiments in which hsp70 binds to the GR in an ATP-dependent and hsp40-dependent step to form a ‘‘primed’’ GR•hsp70 complex that can then bind Hop and hsp90. After hsp90 binding, there is a second ATP-dependent step (or steps) that is rate-limiting and leads to opening of the steroid-binding cleft, which enables access by the steroid. The hsp90 is now in its ATP-dependent conformation and can be bound by p23, which stabilizes the chaperone in that conformation, preventing disassembly of the GR•hsp90 heterocomplex. The hsp40 and Hop components of the five-protein system have been omitted from later steps for simplicity.

 
In addition to hsp70, the first step requires hsp40 and sustained high levels of ATP for formation of a substantial number of primed GR•hsp70•hsp40 complexes that can be activated in the second step (164). For the GR, it has been found that hsp70 binds to stripped receptors when the chaperone is in its ATP-bound state, even in the absence of hsp40 (272). At the end of the priming incubation, the GR-bound hsp70 is in both ADP-bound and ATP-bound states (164). Consistent with a very limited site of attack in the LBD, the number of molecules of hsp70 in the primed complex is low; one to two hsp70 per receptor (271; P. Murphy, unpublished data). The ATPase activity of hsp70 is K+-dependent (273, 274), and both the priming step and the subsequent activating step shown in Figure 4Go are K+-dependent (164). The requirement for a high level of ATP and the dependence on hsp40 and K+ show that both ATP binding and ATPase activity are required to produce primed GR•hsp70 complexes. This has led to the notion that, once hsp70 is bound to the GR, the chaperone may oscillate back and forth between ATP-bound and ADP-bound configurations as it performs an iterative function during the priming step (164).

One observation that seems clear for both GR and PR is that receptor activation in the two-step protocol is more dependent on the presence of hsp40 than is activation by a single incubation with all five proteins at once (164, 271). The reason for this difference is unknown, and an explanation will require more knowledge about the mechanism of hsp40 action in these systems. In some cases, J domain proteins are thought to interact with substrates directly to target the subsequent binding of hsp70 (for review, see Ref. 275). It has been shown that hsp40 binds directly to the PR in the absence of the hsp70 with a stoichiometry of one molecule of hsp40 to one molecule of receptor, and hsp40 remains bound to the PR in a static manner during the assembly process (271). That is, the PR•hsp40 complex can be washed free of unbound hsp40 and then incubated with the other components of the system to yield the steroid-binding state of the receptor (271). Although hsp70 in its ATP-bound form, but not in its ADP-bound form, can bind to the GR in the absence of hsp40 (272), it has not yet been determined whether it is hsp70 or hsp40 that reacts initially with the GR during the priming reaction. Thus, in Figure 4Go, we show both hsp70 and hsp40 contacting the receptor.

In the mechanism of Figure 4Go, we suggest that hsp90 binds to the primed GR•hsp70 complex in its ADP-bound state. Actually, the purified hsp90 we use is not bound by nucleotide (164), but the ADP-bound and unbound states may be essentially the same in terms of the overall conformation of hsp90 (165). Scheibel et al. (276) have calculated that about 70% of the hsp90 in cells would be in the ATP-bound form. This is quite consistent with ~30% of the hsp90 being bound to Hop (140), which binds preferentially to the ADP-bound form (216). The ADP-bound conformation of hsp90 possesses high affinity for hydrophobic substrate (165, 167), and in the model of Figure 4Go, we suggest that in the priming step with hsp70, the steroid-binding cleft is partially opened such that hydrophobic residues in the interior are now available for interaction with hsp90. Although this is a reasonable operating model, as of this writing, there is no direct evidence that hydrophobic residues are exposed during priming or that it is the ADP-bound (or unbound) conformation of hsp90 that initially binds to the primed GR•hsp70 complex.

When the GR is incubated with the five-protein system at 30°C, activation of steroid-binding activity achieves a plateau at 10–15 min. The priming step is complete in ~1 min (164), and hsp90 binding to the primed GR•hsp70 complex during the second step achieves a plateau within ~30 sec (272). Thus, it is the ATP-dependent opening of the binding cleft that is rate limiting for the overall process. Although this ATP-dependent opening of the binding cleft to access by steroid is indicated as a single step in Figure 4Go, it is likely that several changes in chaperone conformation occur during cleft opening. Although it is clear that the receptor-bound hsp90 must be in the ATP-bound conformation that binds p23 when the cleft is open for steroid binding, the conformation of receptor-bound hsp70 at that stage is not known. We have drawn hsp70 in its ATP-bound state but with a question mark to indicate that that is purely speculative.


    Immunophilins, hsp90, and Receptor Trafficking
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Structure/Function Relationships...
 Receptor•hsp90...
 Immunophilins, hsp90, and...
 Speculations on Signal...
 References
 
Although the general features of chaperone interaction may be common to all hsp90 client proteins, diversity arises from a number of TPR-domain proteins that associate with the client protein and hsp90. These TPR-domain proteins may provide a variety of functions to hsp90 complexes, but their roles remain unclear. A subset of TPR-domain proteins, the immunophilins and immunophilin-related proteins, have been studied in a number of systems. These enter in the final step of receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly (Fig. 3Go), and they do not appear to be needed for generation of an active steroid receptor or for the stabilization of receptors against proteasomal degradation. TPR-domain immunophilins are distributed widely (possibly ubiquitously) among animal and plant cells, and TPR-domain binding to hsp90 is conserved (278280). This suggests that immunophilin binding to hsp90 is essential both for the action of the TPR-domain immunophilins and for a major function(s) of hsp90. In this section, we review the evidence that hsp90 is involved in receptor trafficking and that the hsp90-binding immunophilins engage in protein interactions consistent with a role in targeting this trafficking.

Several of the hsp90-binding immunophilins (FKBP52, FKBP51, and CyP-40) were discovered in characterizing components of steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes, and we have previously reviewed their discovery, cloning, and structure (1, 2). The common feature of immunophilins is the peptidyprolyl isomerase (PPIase) domain, and their PPIase activity is inhibited by immunosuppressant drugs of the FK506 or cyclosporin A classes. However, inhibition of PPIase activity has not been found to affect any intrinsic function of steroid receptors, including receptor trafficking (1). Recent observations support the notion that the PPIase domains of the hsp90-binding immunophilins function as protein–protein interaction domains that link steroid receptors to a cytoplasmic–nuclear trafficking system.

The steroid receptors move continuously into and out of the nucleus (reviewed in Ref. 281), and when the GR becomes bound by steroid, the receptor shifts from a predominantly cytoplasmic localization to the nucleus. Normally, this steroid-dependent translocation is rapid (t1/2 ~ 4.5 min), but treatment of cells with the hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin slows the rate of translocation by an order of magnitude (t1/2 ~ 45 min) (282, 283). The rapid, hsp90-dependent movement occurs along cytoskeletal tracts (283), and a variety of observations (reviewed in Ref. 23) support the notion that the steroid receptors traffic through the cytoplasm to the nucleus while they are in heterocomplex with hsp90. From the study of protein interactions and cellular localizations of hsp90-binding immunophilins, it was proposed that these proteins may serve to target the movement of the steroid receptors (178).

The most studied immunophilin in steroid receptor heterocomplexes is the FK506-binding protein FKBP52 (1). Although the majority of FKBP52 is located in the nucleus, where it colocalizes with nuclear GR (284), a minority of FKBP52 that is cytoplasmic colocalizes with microtubules (284, 285). Microinjection of antibody against FKBP52 was found to impede steroid-induced movement of the GR from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, consistent with a role for the immunophilin in receptor trafficking (286). Also consistent with a role in targeting receptor trafficking is the demonstration that FKBP52 binds directly to the GR and that a 35–amino acid segment of the receptor that spans the protosignals comprising the NL1 nuclear localization signal is sufficient for binding (180).

In addition to the proteins shown in the final heterocomplex in Figure 3Go, GR•hsp90 heterocomplexes immunoadsorbed from cell lysates contain cytoplasmic dynein (287, 288). Cytoplasmic dynein is a motor protein responsible for retrograde movement of vesicles along microtubular tracks toward the nucleus (reviewed in Ref. 289). Immunoadsorption of FKBP52 from cell lysates is accompanied by coimmunoadsorption of cytoplasmic dynein (284). Coimmunoadsorption of dynein is prevented by competition with an FKBP52 fragment comprising its PPIase domain, but dynein coadsorption is not affected by FK506 (180). This suggests that the PPIase domain functions as a dynein interaction domain independent of its PPIase activity, and it has recently been shown that the purified PPIase domain of FKBP52 binds directly to the purified intermediate chain of cytoplasmic dynein (290).

Two other receptor-associated immunophilins, the cyclophilin CyP-40 and the combined immunophilin homolog and protein phosphatase PP5, also bind directly via their PPIase domains to cytoplasmic dynein (290). The non-hsp90-binding small immunophilin FKBP12 does not compete for dynein binding (180), suggesting that there is a subclass of PPIase domains that bind to dynein. By use of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)–GR chimera to monitor steroid-dependent cytoplasmic–nuclear receptor translocation, it was shown that GFP-GR movement was inhibited by cotransfection with the FKBP52 PPIase domain but not by FKBP12 (287). As with hsp90-dependent GFP-GR movement, immunophilin-dependent (i.e., PPIase domain-dependent) GFP-GR movement requires intact microtubules (287). Finally, it has been shown that the presence of cytoplasmic dynein in GR•hsp90 heterocomplexes assembled by either rabbit reticulocyte lysate (287) or wheat germ lysate (280) depends on the presence of animal or plant immunophilins, respectively. This conservation of PPIase domain–dynein interaction implies a fundamental role for the hsp90-binding immunophilins in protein trafficking in eukaryotic cells.

ARA9 (also called XAP2 and AIP) is an immunophilin homolog that was isolated in yeast two-hybrid screens for proteins interacting with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) (157159). ARA9 contains three TPRs in its C-terminus and a PPIase homology domain (50% similarity and 27% identity with human FKBP52 PPIase domain) in its N-terminus (157159). ARA9 is recovered in AHR•hsp90 heterocomplexes, where it is bound both to the receptor and, via its TPR domain, to hsp90 (157, 158). Direct binding to receptor appears to account for the fact that ARA9 is specifically found in immunoadsorbed AHR•hsp90 complexes but not in GR•hsp90 complexes (291), whereas the reverse is the case for FKBP52. Although the AHR is structurally very different from the steroid receptors, like steroid receptors, the AHR shuttles into and out of the nucleus, and ligand-induced nuclear accumulation of the receptor is inhibited by geldanamycin (292, 293). Overexpression of ARA9 increases the amount of AHR recovered in the cytosolic fraction (294), and immunofluorescence data show a redistribution of the receptor to the cytoplasmic compartment (294296). Overexpression of ARA9 also delays ligand-induced nuclear accumulation of the AHR (292).

Thus, ARA9 is thought to mediate cytoplasmic retention of the AHR, although how such retention is mediated is not clear. It is interesting that ARA9 does not bind to cytoplasmic dynein (290), and it is possible that it promotes cytoplasmic localization of the AHR by effectively competing for the association of dynein-binding immunophilins to the TPR acceptor site on hsp90. Despite our lack of understanding of how the hsp90-binding immunophilins and immunophilin homologs work, there is considerable evidence that they are involved in receptor trafficking.


    Speculations on Signal Protein•hsp90 Interactions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Structure/Function Relationships...
 Receptor•hsp90...
 Immunophilins, hsp90, and...
 Speculations on Signal...
 References
 
As one peruses Tables I–IVGoGoGoGo, the overall impression is that hsp90 is a protein with complex substrate and cofactor interactions that endow it with the capacity for truly pleotropic action in the eukaryotic cell. When nucleated cells evolved, the genes for hsp90 and hsp70 duplicated (297), and hsp90 became an essential protein (298). The essential function of hsp90 in the primitive eukaryote is unknown, but we speculate that it relates to the ability of the eukaryotic hsp70 and hsp90 to work together. We have outlined here how this machinery interacts with a native conformation of a steroid receptor to open a hydrophobic cleft to access by steroid. The ability of the machinery to open clefts may be of fundamental significance. For example, hsp90 is required for the binding of heme by aponeuronal nitric oxide synthase (299), which must bind heme to form the catalytically active homodimer. In eukaryotes there are many enzymes that must bind cofactors, such as heme or flavins, in hydrophobic clefts, and the opening of such clefts to facilitate cofactor entry may be an important and perhaps essential function of the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery.

Regions where hydrophobic clefts emerge on the protein surface are a normal topologic feature of properly folded proteins regardless of their size or sequence. Thus, the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery has at least a theoretical potential for interacting with hundreds or even thousands of proteins. The acquisition of a TPR-domain acceptor site on the hsp90 dimer gave the chaperone the additional ability to interact with a variety of proteins (i.e., immunophilins, immunophilin homologs, and UNC-45) that bind to motor proteins, giving hsp90 the potential for facilitating protein movement along cytoskeletal highways. Although this potential for hsp90 to bind soluble proteins and facilitate their trafficking to and from the nucleus and other organelles may not have been essential for protein movement within the body of nucleated cells, it is likely that the possession of a system, or systems, for rapid protein trafficking helped these large cells to function better. Clearly, such protein movement systems would have to evolve before cells could develop axons, where movement by diffusion is not possible and proteins must be moved by a specialized mechanism. Thus, in the integrated, multicellular organism possessing a nervous system, a function of hsp90 in protein trafficking may have become essential.

If a major function of the TPR-domain immunophilins is to link proteins that are transiently complexed with hsp90 to a motor protein, then redundancy of this immunophilin action would be predicted, and one specific immunophilin might not be essential. Such a trafficking function of a TPR-domain immunophilin could itself be regulated, as suggested by experiments in which phosphorylation of FKBP52 by casein kinase II abrogated its binding to hsp90 (300). Because most client proteins do not form the more persistent complexes with hsp90 that we have described for steroid receptors, the cycle of heterocomplex assembly/disassembly would be more rapid, and their rapid movement would be saltatory as proteins become attached to and detached from protein motors with each assembly cycle.

One can ask why so many of the substrate proteins of hsp90 that are listed in Tables I–IIIGoGoGo are involved in signal transduction. There may be two reasons for this. First, it is inherent to signal transduction that the signal must move. Thus, before the evolution of the signaling process, many signaling proteins may have been transiently associated with hsp90 as they were moved to their sites of action in the cell. Second, signal transduction involves changes in interactions between proteins. Evolution of persistent binding to hsp90 may have been selected because cleft opening yielded a metastable state in which the proteins were conformationally set up to respond to ligands (as in the case of steroid receptors), to protein modification (e.g., phosphorylation), or to the binding of mediators (e.g., calcium/calmodulin, phosphatidyl inositol), all of which are events that facilitate subsequent protein interactions.

The tumor-suppressor protein p53 may provide us with an example of such a switch from a dynamic to persistent interaction with hsp90. In response to DNA damage, wild-type p53 accumulates in the nucleus, where it activates genes involved in growth arrest and apoptosis (301, 302). Wild-type p53 is transported to the nucleus along microtubules by cytoplasmic dynein (303). Some tumor cells contain p53 mutants that are inactive because they remain in the cytoplasm and are in persistent interaction with hsp90 (54, 55). For example, the temperature-sensitive mutant murine p53 (TSp53Val-135) is cytoplasmic and bound to hsp90 at nonpermissive temperature, whereas at the permissive temperature the mutant p53 translocates to the nucleus and displays little or no hsp90 binding (54). At the permissive temperature, the p53 mutant may be in dynamic assembly/disassembly of complexes with hsp90 and engage with the dynein-mediated movement system proposed here for many soluble (i.e., nonvesicular) proteins. At the nonpermissive temperature, the mutant behaves like the glucocorticoid receptor, which is cytoplasmic and in persistent interaction with hsp90 in hormone-free cells. If the conversion of mutant p53 from its nonpermissive to its permissive state were under hormonal control, the result would be a steroid-type signal transduction system.

A major advance that has been made in the 5 years since our previous reviews of hsp90 regulation of signaling protein function is the definition of the five-protein minimal system for assembly of steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes. This purified system is already permitting mechanistic understanding of how the hsp90/hsp70-based machinery opens the steroid-binding cleft and forms stable complexes with hsp90 (Fig. 4Go). The five-protein system also assembles heterocomplexes between Raf-1 and hsp90 (K.D. Dittmar and W.B. Pratt, unpublished data), suggesting that it has the capacity to assemble heterocomplexes with the protein kinases listed in Table IIGo. The nicest example of the broad application of the minimal purified system is the reconstitution of a functional hepadenovirus reverse transcriptase (304). In this case, transcription from the RNA template requires binding of the reverse transcriptase to an RNA signal (the packaging signal, {varepsilon}) on the template. The reverse transcriptase•{varepsilon} interaction and self-priming by the transcriptase require hsp90, and Hu et al. (304) reconstituted reverse transcriptase activity with the purified five-protein system. Four proteins of the machinery, hsp90, hsp70, Hop, and hsp40, were required for activity, and p23 further enhanced the kinetics of the process. This suggests to us that the purified assembly system may be applicable to a wide variety of biologic processes dependent on hsp90 function.


    Acknowledgments
 
We would like to thank Eileen Ferguson for her expertise in typing the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This manuscript is an update of a previously published minireview entitled, ‘‘The hsp90-based Chaperone System: Involvement in Signal Transduction from a Variety of Hormone and Growth Factor Receptors’’ (Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 217:420–434, 1998). Back

Preparation of this review and the authors’ work reported herein were supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants CA28010 and DK31573 to W.B.P. and DK46249 and DK59284 to D.O.T.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cofactor Sites on hsp90
 Structure/Function Relationships...
 Receptor•hsp90...
 Immunophilins, hsp90, and...
 Speculations on Signal...
 References
 

  1. Pratt WB, Toft DO. Steroid receptor interactions with heat shock protein and immunophilin chaperones. Endocr Rev 18:306–360, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pratt WB. The hsp90-based chaperone system: involvement in signal transduction from a variety of hormone and growth factor receptors. Proc Soc Exptl Biol Med 217:420–434, 1998.[Medline]
  3. Whitesell L, Mimnaugh EG, De Costa B, Myers CE, Neckers LM. Inhibition of heat-shock protein HSP90-pp60v-src heteroprotein complex formation by benzoquinone ansamycins: essential role for stress proteins in oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8324–8328, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Shue G, Kohtz DS. Structural and functional aspects of basic helix-loop-helix protein folding by heat-shock protein 90. J Biol Chem 269:2707–2711, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bogatcheva NV, Ma Y, Urosev D, Gusev NB. Localization of calponin binding sites in the structure of 90 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90). FEBS Lett 457:369–374, 1999.[Medline]
  6. Beissinger M, Buchner J. How chaperones fold proteins. Biol Chem 379:245–259, 1998.[Medline]
  7. Csermely P, Schnaider T, Soti C, Prohaszka Z, Nardai G. The 90-kDa molecular chaperone family: structure, function, and clinical applications. A comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther 79:129–168, 1998.[Medline]
  8. Buchner J. Hsp90 & Co.—a holding for folding. Trends Biochem Sci 24:136–141, 1999.[Medline]
  9. Pearl LH, Prodromou C. Structure and in vivo function of Hsp90. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:46–51, 2000.[Medline]
  10. Young JC, Moarefi I, Hartl FU. Hsp90: a specialized but essential protein-folding tool. J Cell Biol 154:267–273, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Picard D. The role of heat shock proteins in the regulation of steroid receptor function. In: Freedman LP, Ed. The Molecular Biology of Steroid and Nuclear Hormone Receptors. Boston: Birkhauser, pp 1–18, 1998.
  12. Caplan AJ. Hsp90’s secrets unfold: new insights from structural and functional studies. Trends Cell Biol 9:262–268, 1999.[Medline]
  13. Krishna P, Gloor G. The Hsp90 family of proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana.Cell Stress Chaperones 6:238–246, 2001.[Medline]
  14. Höhfeld J, Cyr DM, Patterson C. From cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation. EMBO Reports 2:885–890, 2001.[Medline]
  15. Richter K, Buchner J. Hsp90: chaperoning signal transduction. J Cell Physiol 188:281–290, 2001.[Medline]
  16. Kimmins S, MacRae TH. Maturation of steroid receptors: an example of functional cooperation among molecular chaperones and their associated proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones 5:76–86, 2000.[Medline]
  17. Smith DF. Chaperones in progesterone receptor complexes. Cell Devel Biol 11:45–52, 2000.
  18. Cheung J, Smith DF. Molecular chaperone interactions with steroid receptors: an update. Mol Endocrinol 14:939–946, 2000.[Free Full Text]
  19. Neckers L, Schulte TW, Mimnaugh E. Geldanamycin as a potential anti-cancer agent: its molecular target and biochemical activity. Investigational New Drugs 17:361–373, 1999.[Medline]
  20. Neckers L, Mimnaugh E, Schulte TW. Hsp90 as an anti-cancer target. Drug Resistance Updates 2:165–172, 1999.[Medline]
  21. Roe SM, Prodromou C, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper BW, Pearl LH. Structural basis for inhibition of the hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radicicol and geldanamycin. J Med Chem 42:260–266, 1999.[Medline]
  22. Ochel H-J, Eichhorn K, Gademan G. Geldanamycin: the prototype of a class of antitumor drugs targeting the heat shock protein 90 family of molecular chaperones. Cell Stress Chaperon 6:105–112, 2001.[Medline]
  23. Pratt WB, Silverstein AM, Galigniana MD. A model for the cytoplasmic trafficking of signalling proteins involving the hsp90-binding immunophilins and p50cdc37.Cell Signal 11:839–851, 1999.[Medline]
  24. Pratt WB, Krishna P, Olsen LJ. Hsp90-binding immunophilins in plants: the protein movers. Trends Plant Sci 6:54–58, 2001.[Medline]
  25. DeFranco DB. Role of molecular chaperones in subnuclear trafficking of glucocorticoid receptors. Kidney Internat 57:1241–1249, 2000.[Medline]
  26. Brugge JS, Erikson E, Erikson RL. The specific interaction of the Rous sarcoma virus transformed protein, pp60v-src with two cellular proteins. Cell 25:363–372, 1981.[Medline]
  27. Oppermann H, Levinson W, Bishop JM. A cellular protein that associates with the transforming protein of Rous sarcoma virus is also a heat-shock protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:1067–1071, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Nair SC, Toran EJ, Rimerman RA, Hjermstad S, Smithgall TE, Smith DF. A pathway of multi-chaperone interactions common to diverse regulatory proteins: estrogen receptor, Fes tyrosine kinase, heat shock transcription factor Hsf1, and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Cell Stress Chaperon 1:237–250, 1996.[Medline]
  29. Xu M, Dittmar KD, Giannoukos G, Pratt WB, Simons SS. Binding of hsp90 to the glucocorticoid receptor requires a specific 7-amino acid sequence at the amino terminus of the hormone binding domain. J Biol Chem 273:13918–13924, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Giannoukos G, Silverstein AM, Pratt WB, Simons SS. The seven amino acids (547–553) of rat glucocorticoid receptor required for steroid and hsp90 binding contain a functionally independent LXXLL motif that is critical for steroid binding. J Biol Chem 274:36527–36536, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Sanchez ER, Toft DO, Schlesinger MJ, Pratt WB. Evidence that the 90-kDa phosphoprotein associated with the untransformed L-cell glucocorticoid receptor is a murine heat-shock protein. J Biol Chem 260:12398–12401, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Picard D, Khursheed B, Garabedian MJ, Fortin MG, Lindquist S, Yamamoto KR. Reduced levels of hsp90 compromise steroid receptor action in vivo.Nature 348:166–168, 1990.[Medline]
  33. Nathan DF, Lindquist S. Mutational analysis of hsp90 function: interactions with a steroid receptor and a protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol 15:3917–3925, 1995.[Abstract]
  34. Whitesell L, Cook P. Stable and specific binding of heat shock protein 90 by geldanamycin disrupts glucocorticoid receptor function in intact cells. Mol Endo 10:705–712, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Schuh S, Yonemoto W, Brugge J, Bauer VJ, Riehl RM, Sullivan WP, Toft DO. A 90,000-dalton binding protein common to both steroid receptors and the Rous sarcoma virus transforming protein, pp60v-src.J Biol Chem 260:14292–14296, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Catelli MG, Binart N, Jung-Testas I, Renoir JM, Baulieu EE, Feramisco JR, Welch WJ. The common 90-kd protein component of nontransformed ‘‘8S’’ steroid receptors is a heat-shock protein. EMBO J 4:3131–3135, 1985.[Medline]
  37. Smith DF, Whitesell L, Nair SC, Chen S, Prapapanich V, Rimerman RA. Progesterone receptor structure and function altered by geldanamycin, an hsp90-binding agent. Mol Cell Biol 15:6804–6812, 1995.[Abstract]
  38. Joab I, Radanyi C, Renoir M, Buchou T, Catelli MG, Binart N, Mester J, Baulieu EE. Common nonhormone binding component in nontransformed chick oviduct receptors of four steroid hormones. Nature 308:850–853, 1984.[Medline]
  39. Redeuilh G, Moncharmont B, Secco C, Baulieu EE. Subunit composition of the molybdate-stabilized ‘‘8–9S’’ nontransformed estradiol receptor purified from calf uterus. J Biol Chem 262:6969–6975, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Veldscholte J, Berrevoets CA, Zegers ND, van der Kwast TH, Grootegoed JA, Mulder E. Hormone-induced dissociation of the androgen receptor–heat-shock protein complex: use of a new monoclonal antibody to distinguish transformed from nontransformed receptors. Biochemistry 31:7422–7430, 1992.[Medline]
  41. Fang Y, Fliss AE, Robins DM, Caplan AJ. Hsp90 regulates androgen receptor hormone binding affinity in vivo.J Biol Chem 271:28697–28702, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Rafestin-Oblin ME, Couette B, Radanyi C, Lombes M, Baulieu EE. Mineralocorticosteroid receptor of the chick intestine. Oligomeric structure and transformation. J Biol Chem 264:9304–9309, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Perdew GH. Association of the Ah receptor with the 90-kDa heat-shock protein. J Biol Chem 263:13802–13805, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Denis M, Cuthill S, Wikstrom AC, Poellinger L, Gustafsson JA. Association of the dioxin receptor with the Mr 90,000 heat-shock protein: A structural kinship with the glucocorticoid receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 155:801–807, 1988.[Medline]
  45. Carver LA, Jackiw V, Bradfield CA. The 90-kDa heat shock protein is essential for Ah receptor signaling in a yeast expression system. J Biol Chem 269:30109–30112, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Kazlauskas A, Poellinger L, Pongratz I. The immunophilin-like protein XAP2 regulates ubiquitination and subcellular localization of the dioxin receptor. J Biol Chem 275:41317–41324, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Privalsky ML. A subpopulation of the v-erbA oncogene protein, a derivative of the thyroid hormone receptor, associates with heat-shock protein 90. J Biol Chem 266:1456–1462, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Holley SJ, Yamamoto KR. A role for hsp90 in retinoic receptor signal transduction. Mol Biol Cell 6:1833–1842, 1995.[Abstract]
  49. Ali A, Bharadwaj S, O’Carroll R, Ovsenek N. Hsp90 interacts with and regulates the activity of heat shock factor 1 in Xenopus oocytes. Mol Cell Biol 18:4949–4960, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Zuo J, Guo Y, Guettouche T, Smith DF, Voellmy R. Repression of heat shock transcription factor HSF1 activation by HSP90 (HSP90 complex) that forms a stress-sensitive complex with HSF1. Cell 94:471–480, 1998.[Medline]
  51. McGuire J, Coumailleau P, Whitelaw ML, Gustafsson JA, Poellinger L. The basic helix-loop-helix/PAS factor Sim is associated with hsp90: Implications for regulation by interaction with partner factors. J Biol Chem 270:31353–31357, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Hashimoto Y, Shudo K. Cytosolic-nuclear tumor promotor-specific binding protein: Association with the 90-kDa heat-shock protein and translocation into nuclei by treatment with 12-o-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate. Jpn J Cancer Res 82:665–675, 1991.[Medline]
  53. Hu J, Seeger C. Hsp90 is required for the activity of a hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:1060–1064, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Sepehrnia B, Pas IB, Dasgupta G, Momand J. Heat-shock protein 84 forms a complex with mutant p53 protein predominantly within a cytoplasmic compartment of the cell. J Biol Chem 271:15084–15090, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Blagosklonny MV, Toretsky J, Bohen S, Neckers L. Mutant conformation of p53 translated in vitro or in vivo requires functional hsp90. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8379–8383, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Arbeitman MN, Hogness DS. Molecular chaperones activate the Drasophila ecdysone receptor, an RXR heterodimer. Cell 101:67–77, 2000.[Medline]
  57. Zhang L, Hach A, Wang C. Molecular mechanism governing heme signaling in yeast: a higher-order complex mediates heme regulation of the transcriptional activator HAP1. Mol Cell Biol 18:3819–3828, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Minet E, Mottet D, Michel G, Roland I, Raes M, Remacle J, Michiels C. Hypoxia-induced activation of HIF-1: role of HIF-1{alpha}-Hsp90 interaction. FEBS Lett 460:251–256, 1999.[Medline]
  59. Holt SE, Aisner DL, Baur J, Tesmer VM, Dy M, Ouellette M, Trager JB, Morin GB, Toft DO, Shay JW, Wright WE, White MA. Functional requirement of p23 and Hsp90 in telomerase complexes. Genes Devel 13:817–826, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Miyata Y, Yahara I. p53-Independent association between SV40 large T antigen and the major cytosolic heat shock protein, HSP90. Oncogene 19:1477–1484, 2000.[Medline]
  61. Komori A, Sueoka E, Fujiki H, Ishii M, Kozu T. Association of MTG8 (ETO/CDR), a leukemia-related protein, with serine/threonine protein kinases and heat shock protein hsp90 in human hemotopoietic cell lines. Jpn J Cancer Res 90:60–68, 1999.[Medline]
  62. Hutchison KA, Brott BK, De Leon JH, Perdew GH, Jove R, Pratt WB. Reconstitution of the multiprotein complex of pp60src, hsp90, and p50 in a cell-free system. J Biol Chem 267:2902–2908, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Xu Y, Lindquist S. Heat-shock protein hsp90 governs the activity of pp60v-src kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:7074–7078, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Whitesell L, Mimnaugh EG, De Costa B, Myers CE, Neckers LM. Inhibition of heat shock protein HSP90-pp60v-src heteroprotein complex formation by benzoquinone ansamycins: essential role for stress proteins in oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8324–8328, 1994.
  65. An WG, Schulte TW, Neckers LM. The heat shock protein 90 antagonist geldanamycin alters chaperone association with p210bcr-abl and v-src proteins before their degradation by the proteasome. Cell Growth Differentiation 11:355–360, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Lipsich LA, Cutt J, Brugge JS. Association of the transforming proteins of Rous, Fujinami and Y73 avian sarcoma viruses with the same two cellular proteins. Mol Cell Biol 2:875–880, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Ziemiecki A, Catelli MG, Joab I, Moncharmont B. Association of the heat-shock protein hsp90 with steroid hormone receptors and tyrosine kinase oncogene products. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 138:1298–1307, 1986.[Medline]
  68. Hartson SD, Matts RL. Association of hsp90 with cellular Src-family kinases in a cell-free system correlates with altered kinase structure and function. Biochemistry 33:8912–8920, 1994.[Medline]
  69. Hartson SD, Barrett DJ, Burn P, Matts RL. Hsp90-mediated folding of the lymphoid cell kinase p56lck.Biochemistry 35:13451–13459, 1996.[Medline]
  70. Scholz G, Hartson SD, Cartledge K, Hall N, Shao J, Dunn AR, Matts RL. p50cdc37 can buffer the temperature-sensitive properties of mutant Hck. Mol Cell Biol 20:6984–6995, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Scholz GM, Hartson SD, Cartledge K, Volk L, Matts RL, Dunn AR. The molecular chaperone hsp90 is required for signal transduction by wild-type Hck and maintenance of its constitutively active counterpart. Cell Growth Diff 12:409–417, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Aligue R, Akhavan-Niak H, Russell P. A role for hsp90 in cell cycle control: Wee1 tyrosine kinase requires interaction with hsp90. EMBO J 13:6099–6106, 1994.[Medline]
  73. Cutforth T, Rubin GM. Mutations in hsp83 and cdc37 impair signalling by the sevenless receptor tyrosine kinase in Drosophila.Cell 77:1027–1036, 1994.[Medline]
  74. Rose DW, Wettenhall REH, Kudlicki W, Kramer G, Hardesty B. The 90-kilodalton peptide of the heme-regulated eIF-2{alpha} kinase has sequence similarity with the 90-kilodalton heat-shock protein. Biochemistry 26:6583–6587, 1987.[Medline]
  75. Matts RL, Hurst R. Evidence for the association of the heme-regulated eIF-2{alpha} kinase with the 90-kDa heat-shock protein in rabbit reticulocyte lysate in situ.J Biol Chem 264:15542–15547, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Uma S, Hartson SD, Chen J-J, Matts RL. Hsp90 is obligatory for the heme-regulated eIF-2{alpha} kinase to acquire and maintain activable conformation. J Biol Chem 272:11648–11656, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Palmquist K, Riis B, Nilsson A, Nygard O. Interaction of the calcium and calmodulin regulted eEf-2 kinase with heat-shock protein 90. FEBS Lett 349:239–242, 1994.[Medline]
  78. Yang J, Yang J-M, Iannone M, Shih WJ, Lin Y, Hait WN. Disruption of the EF-2 kinase/Hsp90 protein complex: a possible mechanism to inhibit glioblastoma by geldanamycin. Cancer Res 61:4010–4016, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Miyata Y, Yahara I. The 90-kDa heat shock protein, hsp90, binds and protects casein kinase II from self-aggregation and enhances its kinase activity. J Biol Chem 267:7042–7047, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Stancato LF, Chow YH, Hutchison KA, Perdew GH, Jove R, Pratt WB. Raf exists in a native heterocomplex with hsp90 and p50 that can be reconstituted in a cell-free system. J Biol Chem 268:21711–21716, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Wartmann M, Davis RJ. The native structure of the activated Raf protein kinase is a membrane-bound multi-subunit complex. J Biol Chem 269:6695–6701, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Jaiswal RK, Weissinger E, Kolch W, Landreth GE. Nerve growth factor-mediated activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade involves a signaling complex containing B-Raf and hsp90. J Biol Chem 271:23626–23629, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Lovrich J, Bishof O, Moelling K. Cell cycle-dependent association of Gag-Mil and hsp90. FEBS Lett 343:15–21, 1994.[Medline]
  84. Louvion J-F, Abbas-Terki T, Picard D. Hsp90 is required for pheromone signaling in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 9:3071–3083, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  85. Schulte TW, Blagosklonny MV, Ingui C, Neckers L. Disruption of the Raf-1-hsp90 molecular complex results in destabilization of Raf-1 and loss of Raf-1-Ras association. J Biol Chem 270:24585–24588, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  86. Stancato LF, Silverstein AM, Owens-Grillo JK, Chow Y-H, Jove R, Pratt WB. The hsp90-binding antibiotic geldanamycin decreases Raf levels and epidermal growth factor signaling without disrupting formation of signaling complexes or reducing the specific enzymatic activity of Raf kinase. J Biol Chem 271:4013–4020, 1997.
  87. Stewart S, Sundaram M, Zhang Y, Lee J, Han M, Guan K-L. Kinase suppressor of Ras forms a multiprotein signaling complex and modulates MEK localization. Mol Cell Biol 19:5523–5534, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Flanagan CH, Thorner J. Purification and characterization of a soluble phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J Biol Chem 267:24117–24125, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Ochel H-J, Schulte TW, Nguyen P, Trepel J, Neckers L. The benzoquinone ansamycin geldanamycin stimulates proteolytic degradatiion of focal adhesion kinase. Mol Genet Metab 66:24–30, 1999.[Medline]
  90. Lewis J, Devin A, Miller A, Lin Y, Rodriguez Y, Neckers L, Liu Z. Disruption of hsp90 function results in degradation of the death domain kinase, receptor-interacting protein (RIP), and blockage of tumor necrosis factor-induced nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation. J Biol Chem 275:10519–10526, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Donze O, Picard D. Hsp90 binds and regulates the ligand-inducible {alpha} subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor kinase Gcn2. Mol Cell Biol 19:8422–8432, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  92. Takata Y, Imamura T, Iwata M, Usui I, Haruta T, Nandachi N, Ishiki M, Sasaoka T, Kobayashi M. Functional importance of heat shock protein 90 associated with insulin receptor on insulin-stimulated mitogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237:345–347, 1997.[Medline]
  93. Sepp-Lorenzino L, Ma Z, Lebwohl DE, Vinitsky A, Rosen N. Herbimycin A induces the 20S proteasome- and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of receptor tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem 270:16580–16587, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  94. Mizuno K, Shirogane T, Shinohara A, Iwamatsu A, Hibi M, Hirano T. Regulation of Pim-1 by hsp90. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 281:663–669, 2001.[Medline]
  95. Xu W, Mimnaugh E, Rosser MFN, Nicchitta C, Marcu M, Yarden Y, Neckers L. Sensitivity of mature ErbB2 to geldanamycin is conferred by its kinase domain and is mediated by the chaperone protein hsp90. J Biol Chem 276:3702–3708, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. Tikhomirov O, Carpenter G. Geldanamycin induces ErbB-2 degradation by proteolytic fragmentation. J Biol Chem 275:26625–26631, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  97. Sakagami M, Morrison P, Welch WJ. Benzoquinoid ansamycins (herbimycin A and geldanamycin) interfere with the maturation of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell Stress Chaperones 4:19–28, 1999.[Medline]
  98. Fisher DL, Mandart E, Doree M. Hsp90 is required for c-Mos activation and biphasic MAP kinase activation in Xenopus oocytes. EMBO J 19:1516–1524, 2000.[Medline]
  99. Munoz MJ, Jimenez J. Genetic interactions between hsp90 and the Cdc2 mitotic machinery in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.Mol Gen Genet 261:242–250, 1999.[Medline]
  100. Dai K, Kobayashi R, Beach D. Physical interaction of mammalian CDC37 with CDK4. J Biol Chem 271:22030–22034, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  101. Stepanova L, Leng X, Parker SB, Harper JW. Mammalian p50cdc37 is a protein kinase-targeting subunit of Hsp90 that binds and stabilizes Cdk4. Genes Devel 10:1491–1502, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  102. Mahony D, Parry DA, Lees E. Active cdk6 complexes are predominantly nuclear and represent only a minority of the cdk6 in T cells. Oncogene 16:603–611, 1998.[Medline]
  103. O’Keeffe B, Fong Y, Chen D, Zhou S, Zhou Q. Requirement for a kinase-specific chaperone pathway in the production of a Cdk9/cyclin T1 heterodimer responsible for P-TEFb-mediated Tat stimulation of HIV-1 transcription. J Biol Chem 275:279–287, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  104. de Carcer G, do Carmo Avides M, Lallena MJ, Glover DM, Gonzalez C. Requirement of Hsp90 for centrosomal function reflects its regulation of Polo kinase stability. EMBO J 20:2878–2884, 2001.[Medline]
  105. Bernstein SL, Russell P, Wong P, Fishelevich R, Smith LEH. Heat shock protein 90 in retinal ganglion cells: Association with axonally transported proteins. Visual Neuroscience 18:429–436, 2001.[Medline]
  106. Miyata Y, Ikawa Y, Shibuya M, Nishida E. Specific association of a set of molecular chaperones including HSP90 and Cdc37 with MOK, a member of the mitogen activated protein kinase superfamily. J Biol Chem 276:21841–21848, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  107. Donze O, Abbas-Terki T, Picard D. The Hsp90 chaperone complex is both a facilitator and a repressor of the dsRNA-dependent kinase PKR. EMBO J 20:3771–3780, 2001.[Medline]
  108. Sato S, Fujita N, Tsuruo T. Modulation of Akt kinase activity by binding to Hsp90. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10832–10837, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  109. Goes FS, Martin J. Hsp90 chaperone complexes are required for the activity and stability of yeast protein kinases Mik1, Wee1, and Swe1. Eur J Biochem 268:2281–2289, 2001.[Medline]
  110. Inanobe A, Takahashi K, Katada T. Association of the ß{gamma} subunits of trimeric GTP-binding proteins with 90-kDa heat shock protein, hsp90. J Biochem 115:486–492, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  111. Busconi L, Guan J, Denker BM. Degradation of heterotrimeric G{alpha}o subunits via the proteasome pathway is induced by the hsp90-specific compound geldanamycin. J Biol Chem 275:1565–1569, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  112. Vaiskunaite R, Kozasa T, Voyno-Yasenetskaya TA. Interaction between G{alpha} subunit of heterotrimeric G12 protein and Hsp90 is required for G{alpha}12 signaling. J Biol Chem 276:46088–46093, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. Garcia-Cardena G, Fan R, Shah V, Sorrentino R, Cirino G, Papapetropoulas A, Sessa WC. Dynamic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by Hsp90. Nature 392:821–824, 1998.[Medline]
  114. Bender AT, Silverstein AM, Demady DR, Kanelakis KC, Noguchi S, Pratt WB, Osawa Y. Neuronal nitric-oxide synthase is regulated by the hsp90-based chaperone system in vivo.J Biol Chem 274:1472–1478, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  115. Joly GA, Ayres M, Kilbourn RG. Potent inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase by geldanamycin, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in endothelial, smooth muscle cells, and in rat aorta. FEBS Lett 403:40–44, 1997.[Medline]
  116. Pai KS, Mahajan VB, Lau A, Cunningham DD. Thrombin receptor signaling to cytoskeleton requires Hsp90. J Biol Chem 276:32642–32647, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  117. Loo MA, Jensen TJ, Cui L, Hou Y, Chang X-B, Riordan JR. Perturbation of Hsp90 interaction with nascent CFTR prevents its maturation and accelerates its degradation by the proteasome. EMBO J 17:6879–6887, 1998.[Medline]
  118. Kumar R, Grammatikakis N, Chinkers M. Regulation of the atrial natriuretic peptide receptor by heat shock protein 90 complexes. J Biol Chem 276:11371–11375, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  119. Kang J, Kim T, Ko Y-G, Rho SB, Park SG, Kim MJ, Kwon HJ, Kim S. Heat shock protein 90 mediates protein–protein interactions between human aminoacyl t-RNA synthetases. J Biol Chem 275: 31682–31688, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  120. Gilmore R, Coffey MC, Lee PWK. Active participation of Hsp90 in the biogenesis of the trimeric reovirus cell attachment protein {sigma}1. J Biol Chem 273:15227–15233, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  121. Herbertsson H, Kuhme T, Hammerstrom S. The 650-kDa 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid binding complex: occurrence in human platelets, identification of hsp90 as a constituent, and binding properties of its 50-kDa subunit. Arch Biochem Biophys 367:33–38, 1999.[Medline]
  122. Pandey P, Saleh A, Nakazawa A, Kumar S, Srinivasula SM, Kumar V, Weichselbaum R, Nalin C, Alnemri ES, Kufe D, Kharbanda S. Negative regulation of cytochrome c-mediated oligomerization of Apaf-1 and activation of procaspase-9 by heat shock protein 90. EMBO J 19:4310–4322, 2000.[Medline]
  123. Imai J, Yahara I. Role of hsp90 in salt stress tolerance via stabilization and regulation of calcineurin. Mol Cell Biol 20:9262–9270, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  124. Tsubuki S, Saito Y, Kawashima S. Purification and characterization of an endogenous inhibitor specific to the Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-MCA degrading activity in proteasome and its identification as heat-shock protein 90. FEBS Lett 344:229–233, 1994.[Medline]
  125. Wagner BJ, Margolis JW. Age-dependent association of isolated bovine lens multicatalytic proteinase complex (proteasome) with heat-shock protein 90, an endogenous inhibitor. Arch Biochem Biophys 323:455–462, 1995.[Medline]
  126. Agarraberes FA, Dice JF. A molecular chaperone complex at the lysosomal membrane is required for protein translocation. J Cell Sci 114:2491–2499, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  127. Uzawa M, Grams J, Madden B, Toft DO, Salisbury JL. Identification of a complex between centrin and heat shock proteins in CSF-arrested Xenopus oocytes and dissociation of the complex following oocyte activation. Devel Biol 171:51–59, 1995.[Medline]
  128. Lange BMH, Bachi A, Wilm M, Gonzalez C. Hsp90 is a core centrosomal component and is required at different stages of the centrosome cycle in Drosophila and vertebrates. EMBO J 19:1252–1262, 2000.[Medline]
  129. Koyasu S, Nishida E, Kadowaki T, Matsuzaki F, Iida K, Harada F, Kasuga M, Sakai H, Yahara I. Two mammalian heat shock proteins, HSP90 and HSP100 are actin-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:8054–8058, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  130. Sanchez ER, Redmond T, Scherrer LC, Bresnick EH, Welsh MJ, Pratt WB. Evidence that the 90-kilodalton heat shock protein is associated with tubulin-containing complexes in L cell cytosol and in intact PtK cells. Mol Endocrinol 2:756–760, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  131. Gusarova V, Caplan AJ, Brodsky JL, Fisher EA. Apoprotein B degradation is promoted by the molecular chaperones hsp90 and hsp70. J Biol Chem 276:24891–24900, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  132. Abbas-Terki T, Picard D. {alpha}-Complemented ß-galactosidase. An in vivo model substrate for the molecular chaperone heat-shock protein 90 in yeast. Eur J Biochem 266:517–523, 1999.[Medline]
  133. Bruneau N, Lombardo D. Chaperone function of a Grp 94-related protein for folding and transport of the bite salt-dependent lipase. J Biol Chem 270:13524–13533, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  134. Melnick J, Aviel S, Argon Y. The endoplasmic reticulum stress protein GRP94, in addition to BIP, associates with unassembled immunoglobulin chains. J Biol Chem 267:21303–21306, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  135. Hoshino T, Wang J, Devetten MP, Iwata N, Kajigaya S, Wise RJ, Liu JM, Youssoufian H. Molecular chaperone GRP94 binds to the Fanconi anemia group C protein and regulates its intracellular expression. Blood 91:4379–4386, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  136. Muresan Z, Arvan P. Thyroglobulin transport along the secretory pathway. Investigation of the role of molecular chaperone, Grp94, in protein export from the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 272:26095–26102, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  137. Young JC, Schneider G, Hartl U. In vitro evidence that hsp90 contains two independent chaperone sites. FEBS Lett 418:139–143, 1997.[Medline]
  138. Scheibel T, Weikl T, Buchner J. Two chaperone sites in Hsp90 differing in substrate specificity and ATP dependence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1495–1499, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  139. Freitag DG, Ouimet PM, Girvitz TL, Kapoor M. Heat shock protein 80 of Neurospora crassa, a cytosolic molecular chaperone of the eukaryotic stress 90 family, interacts directly with heat shock protein 70. Biochemistry 36:10221–10229, 1997.[Medline]
  140. Murphy PJM, Kanelakis KC, Galigniana MD, Morishima Y, Pratt WB. Stoichiometry, abundance, and functional significance of the hsp90/hsp70-based multiprotein chaperone machinery in reticulocyte lysate. J Biol Chem 276:30092–30098, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  141. Johnson JL, Toft DO. A novel chaperone complex for steroid receptors involving heat shock proteins, immunophilins, and p23. J Biol Chem 269:24989–24993, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  142. Bohen S. Genetic and biochemical analysis of p23 and ansamycin antibiotics in the function of hsp90-dependent signaling proteins. Mol Cell Biol 18:3330–3339, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  143. Fang Y, Fliss AE, Rao J, Caplan AJ. SBA1 encodes a yeast hsp90 cochaperone that is homologous to vertebrate p23 proteins. Mol Cell Biol 18:3727–3734, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  144. Smith DF, Sullivan WP, Marion TN, Zaitsu K, Madden B, McCormick DJ, Toft DO. Identification of a 60-kilodalton stress-related protein, p60, which interacts with hsp90 and hsp70. Mol Cell Biol 13:869–876, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  145. Chang H-CJ, Lindquist S. Conservation of hsp90 macromolecular complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J Biol Chem 269:24983–24988, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  146. Creve G, Bates H, Huikeshoven H, Cotterill S. The Drosophila Dpit47 protein is a nuclear Hsp90 co-chaperone that interacts with DNA polymenase {alpha}. J Cell Sci 114:2015–2025, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  147. Tai P-K, Maeda Y, Nakao K, Wakim NG, Duhring JL, Faber LE. A 59-kilodalton protein associated with progestin, estrogen, androgen, and glucocorticoid receptors. Biochemistry 25:5269–5276, 1986.[Medline]
  148. Radanyi C, Chambraud B, Baulieu EE. The ability of the immunophilin FKBP59-HBI to interact with the 90-kDa heat shock protein is encoded by its tetratricopeptide repeat domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:11197–11201, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  149. Smith DF, Baggenstoss BA, Marion TN, Rimerman RA. Two FKBP-related proteins are associated with progesterone receptor complexes. J Biol Chem 268:18365–18371, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  150. Hoffmann K, Handschumacher RE. Cyclophilin-40: evidence for a dimeric complex with hsp90. Biochem J 307:5–8, 1995.
  151. Ratajczak T, Carrello A. Cyclophilin 40 (CyP-40), mapping of its hsp90 binding domain and evidence that FKBP52 competes with CyP-40 for hsp90 binding. J Biol Chem 271:2961–2965, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  152. Duina AA, Chang H-CJ, Marsh JA, Lindquist S, Gaber RF. A cyclophilin function in Hsp90-dependent signal transduction. Science 274:1713–1715, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  153. Dolinski KJ, Cardenas ME, Heitman J. CNS1 encodes an essential p60/Sti1 homolog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that suppresses cyclophilin 40 mutations and interacts with Hsp90. Mol Cell Biol 18:7344–7352, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  154. Marsh JA, Kalton HM, Gaber RF. Cns1 is an essential protein associated with the hsp90 chaperone complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that can restore cyclophilin 40-dependent functions in cpr7{Delta} cells. Mol Cell Biol 18:7353–7359, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  155. Chen M-S, Silverstein AM, Pratt WB, Chinkers M. The tetratricopeptide repeat domain of protein phosphatase 5 mediates binding to glucocorticoid receptor heterocomplexes and acts as a dominant negative mutant. J Biol Chem 271:32315–32320, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  156. Silverstein AM, Galigniana MD, Chen M-S. Owens-Grillo JK, Chinkers M, Pratt WB. Protein phosphatase 5 is a major component of glucocorticoid receptor•hsp90 complexes with properties of an FK506-binding immunophilin. J Biol Chem 272:16224–16230, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  157. Ma Q, Whitlock JP. A novel cytoplasmic protein that interacts with the Ah receptor, contains tetratricopeptide repeat motifs, and augments the transcriptional response to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Biol Chem 272:8878–8884, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  158. Carver LA, Bradfield CA. Ligand-dependent interaction of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor with a novel immunophilin homolog in vivo.J Biol Chem 272:11452–11456, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  159. Meyer BK, Pray-Grant MG, Vanden Heuvel JP, Perdew GH. Hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 is a subunit of the unliganded aryl hydrocarbon receptor core complex and exhibits transcriptional enhancer activity. Mol Cell Biol 18:978–988, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  160. Connell P, Ballinger CA, Jiang J, Wu Y, Thompson LJ, Höhfeld J, Patterson C. The co-chaperone CHIP regulates protein triage decisions mediated by heat shock proteins. Nature Cell Biol 3:93–96, 2001.[Medline]
  161. Whitelaw ML, Hutchison K, Perdew GH. A 50-kDa cytosolic protein complexed with the 90-kDa heat shock protein (hsp90) is the same protein complexed with pp60v-src hsp90 in cells transformed by the Rous sarcoma virus. J Biol Chem 266:16436–16440, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  162. Scholz GM, Cartledge K, Hall NE. Identification and characterization of Harc, a novel Hsp90-associating relative of Cdc37. J Biol Chem 276:30971–30979, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  163. Minami Y, Kawasaki H, Suzuki K, Yahara I. The calmodulin-binding domain of the mouse 90-kDa heat shock protein. J Biol Chem 268:9604–9610, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  164. Morishima Y, Kanelakis KC, Murphy PJM, Schewach DS, Pratt WB. Evidence for iterative ratcheting of receptor-bound hsp70 between its ATP and ADP conformations during assembly of glucocorticoid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes. Biochemistry 40:1109–1116, 2001.[Medline]
  165. Sullivan W, Stensgard B, Caucutt G, Bartha B, McMahon N, Alnemri ES, Litwack G, Toft D. Nucleotides and two functional states of hsp90. J Biol Chem 272:8007–8012, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  166. Dittmar KD, Demady DR, Stancato LF, Krishna P, Pratt WB. Folding of the glucocorticoid receptor by the heat shock protein (hsp) 90-based chaperone machinery. The role of p23 is to stabilize receptor•hsp90 heterocomplexes formed by hsp90•p60•hsp70. J Biol Chem 272:21213–21220, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  167. Grenert JP, Sullivan WP, Fadden P, Haystead TAJ, Clark J, Mimnaugh E, Krutzsch H, Ochel HJ, Schulte TW, Sausville E, Neckers LM, Toft DO. The amino-terminal domain of heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) that binds geldanamycin is an ATP/ADP switch domain that regulates hsp90 conformation. J Biol Chem 272:23843–23850, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  168. Chen S, Prapapanich V, Rimerman RA, Honoré B, Smith DF. Interactions of p60, a mediator of progesterone receptor assembly, with heat shock proteins hsp90 and hsp70. Mol Endocrinol 10:682–693, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  169. Lassle M, Blatch GL, Kundra V, Takatori T, Zetter BR. Stress-inducible, murine protein mSTI1. Characterization of binding domains for heat shock proteins and in vitro phosphorylation by different kinases. J Biol Chem 272:1876–1884, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  170. Dittmar KD, Pratt WB. Folding of the glucocorticoid receptor by the reconstituted hsp90-based chaperone machinery. The initial hsp90•p60•hsp70-dependent step is sufficient for creating the steroid binding conformation. J Biol Chem 272:13047–13054, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  171. Dittmar KD, Banach M, Galigniana MD, Pratt WB. The role of DnaJ-like proteins in glucocorticoid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly by the reconstituted hsp90•p60•hsp70 foldosome complex. J Biol Chem 273:7358–7366, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  172. Chen S, Sullivan WP, Toft DO, Smith DF. Differential interactions of p23 and the TPR-containing proteins Hop, Cyp40, FKBP52 and FKBP51 with hsp90 mutants. Cell Stress Chaperones 3:118–129, 1998.[Medline]
  173. Young JC, Obermann MJ, Hartl FU. Specific binding of tetratricopeptide repeat proteins to the C-terminal 12-kDa domain of hsp90. J Biol Chem 273:18007–18010, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  174. Carrello A, Ingley E, Minchin RF, Tsai S, Ratajczak T. The common tetratricopeptide repeat acceptor site for steroid receptor-associated immunophilins and Hop is located in the dimerization domain of hsp90. J Biol Chem 274:2682–2689, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  175. Russell LC, Whitt SR, Chen MS, Chinkers M. Identification of conserved residues required for the binding of a tetratricopeptide repeat domain to heat shock protein 90. J Biol Chem 274:20060–20063, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  176. Owens-Grillo JK, Hoffmann K, Hutchison KA, Yem AW, Deibel MR, Handschumacher RE, Pratt WB. The cyclosporin A-binding immunophilin CyP-40 and the FK506-binding immunophilin hsp56 bind to a common site on hsp90 and exist in independent cytosolic heterocomplexes with the untransformed glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem 270:20479–20484, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  177. Ratajczak T, Carrello A. Cyclophilin 40 (CyP-40), mapping of its hsp90 binding domain and evidence that FKBP52 competes with CyP-40 for hsp90 binding. J Biol Chem 271:2961–2965, 1996.
  178. Owens-Grillo JK, Czar MJ, Hutchison KA, Hoffmann K, Perdew GH, Pratt WB. A model of protein targeting mediated by immunophilins and other proteins that bind to hsp90 via tetratricopeptide repeat domains. J Biol Chem 271:13468–13475, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  179. Barent RL, Nair SC, Carr DC, Ruan Y, Rimerman RA, Fulton J, Zhang Y, Smith DF. Analysis of FKBP51/FKBP52 chimeras and mutants for hsp90 binding and association with progesterone receptor complexes. Mol Endocrinol 12:342–354, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  180. Silverstein AM, Galigniana MD, Kanelakis KC, Radanyi C, Renoir J-M, Pratt WB. Different regions of the immunophilin FKBP52 determine its association with the glucocorticoid receptor, hsp90, and cytoplasmic dynein. J Biol Chem 274:36980–36986, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  181. Prodromou C, Siligardi G, O’Brien R, Woolfson DN, Regan L, Panaretou B, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Regulation of hsp90 ATPase activity by tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-domain co-chaperones. EMBO J 18:754–762, 1999.[Medline]
  182. Pirkl F, Buchner J. Functional analysis of the hsp90-associated human peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerases FKBP51, FKBP52 and Cyp40. J Mol Biol 308:795–806, 2001.[Medline]
  183. Renoir J-M, Mercier-Bodard C, Hoffmann K, Le Bihan S, Ning Y-M, Sanchez ER, Handschumacher RE, Baulieu E-E. Cyclosporin A potentiates the dexamethasone-induced mouse mammary tumor virus-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity in LMCAT cells: a possible role for different heat shock protein-binding immunophilins in glucocorticosteroid receptor-mediated gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4977–4981, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  184. Ballinger CA, Connell P, Wu Y, Hu Z, Thompson LJ, Yin L-Y, Patterson C. Identification of CHIP, a novel tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein that interacts with heat shock proteins and negatively regulates chaperone functions. Mol Cell Biol 19:4535–4545, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  185. Jiang J, Ballinger CA, Wu Y, Dai Q, Cyr DM, Höhfeld J, Patterson C. CHIP is a U-box-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase. Identification of hsc70 as a target for ubiquitylation. J Biol Chem 276:42938–42944, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  186. Stepanova L, Leng X, Parker SB, Harper JW. Mammalian p50cdc37 is a protein kinase-targeting subunit of Hsp90 that binds and stabilizes Cdk4. Genes Devel 10:1491–1502, 1996.
  187. Perdew GH, Wiegand H, Vanden Heuvel JP, Mitchell C, Singh SS. A 50 kilodalton protein associated with Raf and pp60v-src protein kinases is a mammalian homolog of the cell cycle control protein cdc37. Biochemistry 36:3600–3607, 1997.[Medline]
  188. Silverstein AM, Grammatikakis N, Cochran BH, Chinkers M, Pratt WB. p50cdc37 Binds directly to the catalytic domain of Raf as well as to a site on hsp90 that is topologically adjacent to the tetratricopeptide repeat binding site. J Biol Chem 273:20090–20095, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  189. Dey B, Lightbody JJ, Boschelli F. CDC37 is required for p60v-src activity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 7:1405–1417, 1996.[Abstract]
  190. Gerber MR, Farrell A, Deshaies RJ, Herskowitz I, Morgan DO. Cdc37 is required for association of the protein kinase Cdc28 with G1 and mitotic cyclins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4651–4655, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  191. Schutz AR, Giddings TH, Stiener E, Winey M. The yeast CDC37 gene interacts with MPS1 and is required for proper execution of spindle pole body duplication. Cell Biol 136:969–982, 1997.
  192. Valay J-G, Simon M, Dubois M-F, Bensaude O, Facca C, Faye G. The KIN28 gene is required both for RNA polymerase II mediated transcription and phosphorylation of the Rpb1p CTD. J Mol Biol 249:535–544, 1995.[Medline]
  193. Hunter T, Poon YC. Cdc37: a protein kinase chaperone? Trends Cell Biol 7:157–161, 1997.
  194. Brugge JS. Interaction of the Rous sarcoma virus protein pp60src with the cellular proteins pp50 and pp90. Curr Topics Microbial Immunol 123:1–22, 1996.
  195. Fliss AE, Fang Y, Boschelli F, Caplan AJ. Differential in vivo regulation of steroid hormone receptor activation by Cdc37p. Mol Biol Cell 8:2501–2509, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  196. Rao J, Lee P, Benzeno S, Cardozo C, Albertus J, Robins DM, Caplan AJ. Functional interaction of human Cdc37 with the androgen receptor but not the glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem 276:5814–5820, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  197. Stancato LF, Chow Y-H, Owens-Grillo JK, Yem AW, Deibel MR, Jove R, Pratt WB. The native v-Raf•hsp90•p50 heterocomplex contains a novel immunophilin of the FK506 binding class. J Biol Chem 269:22157–22161, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  198. Hartson SD, Irwin AD, Shao J, Scroggins BT, Volk L, Huang W, Matts RL. p50cdc37 is a nonexclusive hsp90 cohort which participates intimately in hsp90-mediated folding of immature kinase molecules. Biochemistry 39:7631–7644, 2000.[Medline]
  199. Stebbins CE, Russo AA, Schneider C, Rosen N, Hartl FU, Pavleich NP. Crystal structure of an hsp90-geldanamycin complex: Targeting of a protein chaperone by an antitumor agent. Cell 89:239–250, 1997.[Medline]
  200. Prodromou C, Roe SM, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Identification and structural characterization of the ATP/ADP-binding site in the hsp90 molecular chaperone. Cell 90:65–75, 1997.[Medline]
  201. Dutta R, Inouye M. GHKL, an emergent ATPase/kinase superfamily. TIBS 25:24–28, 2000.
  202. Bergerat A, deMassy B, Gadelle D, Varoutas P-C, Nicolas A, Forterre P. An atypical topoisomerase II from archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386:414–417, 1997.[Medline]
  203. Prodromou C, Panaretou B, Chohan S, Siligardi G, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Roe SM, Piper PW, Pearl LH. The ATPase cycle of hsp90 drives a molecular ‘clamp’ via transient dimerization of the N-terminal domains. EMBO J 19:4383–4392, 2000.[Medline]
  204. Nemoto T, Ohara-Nemoto Y, Ota M, Takagi T, Yokoyama K. Mechanism of dimer formation of the 90-kDa heat-shock protein. Eur J Biochem 233:1–8, 1995.[Medline]
  205. Chadli A, Bouhouche I, Sullivan W, Stensgard B, McMahon N, Catelli MG, Toft DO. Dimerization and N-terminal domain proximity underlie the function of the molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:12524–12529, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  206. Obermann WMJ, Sondermann H, Russo AA, Pavletich NP, Hartl FU. In vivo function of hsp90 is dependent on ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis. J Cell Biol 143:901–910, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  207. Panaretou B, Prodromou C, Roe SM, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. ATP binding and hydrolysis are essential to the function of the hsp90 molecular chaperone in vivo.EMBO J 17:4829–4836, 1998.[Medline]
  208. Grenert JP, Johnson BD, Toft DO. The importance of ATP binding and hydrolysis by hsp90 in formation and function of protein heterocomplexes. J Biol Chem 274:17525–17533, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  209. Richter K, Muschler P, Hainzl O, Buchner J. Coordinated ATP hydrolysis by the hsp90 dimer. J Biol Chem 276:33689–33696, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  210. S|fpti C, Rácz A, Csermely P. A nucleotide-dependent molecular switch controls ATP binding at the C-terminal domain of hsp90: N-terminal nucleotide binding unmasks a C-terminal binding pocket. J Biol Chem 277:7066–7075, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  211. Weikl T, Muschler P, Richter K, Veit T, Reinstein J, Buchner J. C-terminal regions of hsp90 are important for trapping the nucleotide during the ATPase cycle. J. Mol Biol 303:583–592, 2000.
  212. Owen BAL, Sullivan WP, Felts SJ, Toft DO. Regulation of heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) ATPase activity by sequences in the carboxyl terminus. J Biol Chem 277:7086–7091, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  213. Young JC, Hartl FU. Polypeptide release by hsp90 involves ATP hydrolysis and is enhanced by the co-chaperone p23. EMBO J 19:5930–5940, 2000.[Medline]
  214. Marcu MG, Chadli A, Bouhouche I, Catelli M, Neckers LM. The heat shock protein 90 antagonist novobiocin interacts with a previously unrecognized ATP-binding domain in the carboxyl terminus of the chaperone. J Biol Chem 275:37181–37186, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  215. Garnier C, Lafitte D, Tsvetkov PO, Barbier P, Leclerc-Devin J, Millot J-M, Briand C, Makarov AA, Catelli MG, Peyrot V. Binding of ATP to heat shock protein 90: Evidence for an ATP-binding site in the C-terminal domain. J Biol Chem 277:12208–12214, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  216. Johnson BD, Schumacher RJ, Ross ED, Toft DO. Hop modulates hsp70/hsp90 interactions in protein folding. J Biol Chem 273:3679–3686, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  217. Gross M, Hessefort S. Purification and characterization of a 66-kDa protein from rabbit reticulocyte lysate which promotes the recycling of hsp70. J Biol Chem 271:16833–16841, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  218. Hartson SD, Thulasiraman V, Huang W, Whitesell L, Matts RL. Molybdate inhibits hsp90, induces structural changes in its C-terminal domain, and alters its interactions with substrates. Biochem 38:3837–3849, 1999.[Medline]
  219. Bose S, Weikl T, Bügl H, Buchner J. Chaperone function of hsp90-associated proteins. Science 274:1715–1717, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  220. Freeman BC, Toft DO, Morimoto RI. Molecular chaperone machines: Chaperone activities of the cyclophilin Cyp-40 and the steroid aporeceptor-associated protein p23. Science 274:1718–1720, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  221. Freeman BC, Felts SJ, Toft DO, Yamamoto KR. The p23 molecular chaperones act at a late step in intracellular receptor action to differentially affect ligand efficacies. Genes & Development 14:422–434, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  222. Johnson BD, Chadli A, Felts SJ, Bouhouche I, Catelli MG, Toft DO. Hsp90 chaperone activity requires the full-length protein and interaction among its multiple domains. J Biol Chem 275:32499–32507, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  223. Argon Y, Simen BB. GRP94, an ER chaperone with protein and peptide binding properties. Cell & Development Biol 10:495–505, 1999.
  224. Wearsch PA, Voglino L, Nicchitta CV. Structural transitions accompanying the activation of peptide binding to the endoplasmic reticulum hsp90 chaperone GRP94. Biochemistry 37:5709–5719, 1998.[Medline]
  225. Blachere NE, Li Z, Chandawarkar RY, Suto R, Jaikaria NS, Basu S, Udono H, Srivastava PK. Heat shock protein–peptide complexes, reconstituted in vitro, elicit peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte response and tumor immunity. J Exp Med 186:1315–1322, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  226. Scheibel T, Siegmund HI, Jaenicke R, Ganz P, Lilie H, Buchner J. The charged region of hsp90 modulates the function of the N-terminal domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:1297–1302, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  227. Nicchitta CV. Biochemical, cell biological and immunological issues surrounding the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP94/gp96. Current Opinion Immunol 10:103–109, 1998.[Medline]
  228. Srivastava PK, Menoret A, Basu S, Binder RJ, McQuade KL. Heat shock proteins come of age: Primitive functions acquire new roles in an adaptive world. Immunity 8:657–665, 1998.[Medline]
  229. Linderoth NA, Popowicz A, Sastry S. Identification of the peptide-binding site in the heat shock chaperone/tumor rejection antigen gp96 (Grp94). J Biol Chem 275:5472–5477, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  230. Wassenberg JJ, Reed RC, Nicchitta CV. Ligand interactions in the adenosine nucleotide-binding domain of the hsp90 chaperone, GRP94. J Biol Chem 275:22806–22814, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  231. Fujita N, Sato S, Ishida A, Tsuruo T. Involvement of hsp90 in signaling and stability of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1. J Biol Chem 277:10346–10353, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  232. Nakamura T, Hinagata J-I, Tanaka T, Imanishi T, Wada Y, Kodama T, Doi T. HSP90, HSP70, and GAPDH directly interact with the cytoplasmic domain of macrophage scavenger receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290:858–864, 2002.[Medline]
  233. Banumathy G, Singh V, Tatu U. Host chaperones are recruited in membrane-bound complexes by Plasmodium falciparum.J Biol Chem 277:3902–3912, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  234. Barral JM, Hutagalung AH, Brinker A, Hartl FU, Epstein HF. Role of the myosin assembly protein UNC-45 as a molecular chaperone for myosin. Science 295:669–671, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  235. Smith DF, Showalter DB, Kost SL, Toft DO. Reconstitution of progesterone receptor with heat shock proteins. Mol Endocrinol 4:1704–1711, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  236. Scherrer LC, Dalman FC, Massa E, Meshinchi S, Pratt WB. Structural and functional reconstitution of the glucocorticoid receptor-hsp90 complex. J Biol Chem 265:21397–21400, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  237. Hutchison KA, Czar MJ, Scherrer LC, Pratt WB. Monovalent cation selectivity for ATP-dependent association of the glucocorticoid receptor with hsp70 and hsp90. J Biol Chem 267:14047–14053, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  238. Smith DF, Stensgard BA, Welch WJ, Toft DO. Assembly of progesterone receptor with heat shock proteins and receptor activation are ATP-mediated events. J Biol Chem 267:1350–1356, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  239. Hutchison KA, Dittmar KD, Czar MJ, Pratt WB. Proof that hsp70 is required for assembly of the glucocorticoid receptor into a heterocomplex with hsp90. J Biol Chem 269:5043–5049, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  240. Smith DF. Dynamics of heat shock protein 90-progesterone receptor binding and the disactivation loop model for steroid receptor complexes. Mol Endocrinol 7:1418–1429, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  241. Dittmar KD, Hutchison KA, Owens-Grillo JK, Pratt WB. Reconstitution of the steroid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly system of rabbit reticulocyte lysate. J Biol Chem 271:12833–12839, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  242. Kosano H, Stensgard B, Charlesworth MC, McMahon N, Toft DO. The assembly of progesterone receptor-hsp90 complexes using purified proteins. J Biol Chem 273:32973–32979, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  243. Hutchison KA, Dittmar KD, Pratt WB. All of the factors required for assembly of the glucocorticoid receptor into a functional heterocomplex with heat shock protein 90 are preassociated in a self-sufficient protein folding structure, a ‘‘foldosome.’’J Biol Chem 269:27894–27899, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  244. Stancato LF, Silverstein AM, Gitler C, Groner B, Pratt WB. Use of the thiol-specific derivatizing agent N-iodoacetyl-3-[125I]iodotyrosine to demonstrate conformational differences between the unbound and hsp90-bound glucocorticoid receptor hormone binding domain. J Biol Chem 271:8831–8836, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  245. Simons SS, Sistare FD, Chakraborti PK. Steroid binding activity is retained in a 16-kDa fragment of the steroid binding domain of rat glucocorticoid receptors. J Biol Chem 264:14493–14497, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  246. Modarress KJ, Opoku J, Xu M, Sarlis NJ, Simons SS. Steroid-induced conformational changes at ends of the hormone-binding domain in the rat glucocorticoid receptor are independent of agonist versus antagonist activity. J Biol Chem 272:23986–23994, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  247. Mackem S, Baumann CT, Hager GL. A glucocorticoid/retinoic acid receptor chimera that displays cytoplasmic/nuclear translocation in response to retinoic acid. J Biol Chem 276:45501–45504, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  248. Zeiner M, Gebauer M, Gehring U. Mammalian protein RAP46: an interaction partner and modulator of 70 kDa heat shock proteins. EMBO J 16:5483–5490, 1997.[Medline]
  249. Takayama S, Bimston DN, Matsuzawa S, Freeman BC, Aime-Sempe C, Xie Z, Morimoto RI, Reed JC. BAG-1 modulates the chaperone activity of hsp70/hsc70. EMBO J 16:4887–4896, 1997.[Medline]
  250. Höhfeld J, Jentsch S. Grp-E-like regulation of the hsc70 chaperone by the anti-apoptotic protein BAG-1. EMBO J 16:6209–6216, 1997.[Medline]
  251. Stuart JK, Myszka DG, Joss L, Mitchell RS, McDonald SM, Xie Z, Takayama S, Reed JC, Ely KR. Characterization of interactions between the anti-apoptotic protein BAG-1 and hsc70 molecular chaperones. J Biol Chem 273:22506–22514, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  252. Kanelakis KC, Morishima Y, Dittmar KD, Galigniana MD, Takayama S, Reed JC, Pratt WB. Differential effects of the hsp70-binding protein BAG-1 on glucocorticoid receptor folding by the hsp90-based chaperone machinery. J Biol Chem 274:34134–34140, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  253. Prapapanich V, Chen S, Nair SC, Rimerman RA, Smith DF. Molecular cloning of human p48, a transient component of progesterone receptor complexes and an hsp70-binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 10:420–431, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  254. Höhfeld J, Minami Y, Hartl FU. Hip, a novel cochaperone involved in the eukaryotic hsc70/hsp40 reaction cycle. Cell 83:589–598, 1995.[Medline]
  255. Gebauer M, Zeiner M, Gehring U. Proteins interacting with the molecular chaperone hsp70/hsc70: physical association and effects on refolding activity. FEBS Lett 417:109–113, 1997.[Medline]
  256. Prapapanich V, Chen S, Smith DF. Mutation of Hip’s carboxy-terminal region inhibits a transitional stage of progesterone receptor assembly. Mol Cell Biol 18:944–952, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  257. Kanelakis KC, Murphy PJM, Galigniana MD, Morishima Y, Takayama S, Reed JC, Toft DO, Pratt WB. hsp70 interacting protein Hip does not affect glucocorticoid receptor folding by the hsp90-based chaperone machinery except to oppose the effect of BAG-1. Biochemistry 39:14314–14321, 2000.[Medline]
  258. Morishima Y, Kanelakis KC, Silverstein AM, Dittmar KD, Estrada L, Pratt WB. The hsp organizer protein Hop enhances the rate of but is not essential for glucocorticoid receptor folding by the multiprotein hsp90-based chaperone system. J Biol Chem 275:6894–6900, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  259. Zhao Y-G, Gilmore R, Leone G, Coffey MC, Weber B, Lee PWK. Hsp90 phosphorylation is linked to its chaperoning function. J Biol Chem 276:32822–32827, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  260. Nemoto TK, Ono T, Kobayakawa T, Tanaka E, Baba TT, Tanaka K, Takagi T, Gotoh T. Domain–domain interactions of HtpG, an Escherichia coli homologue of eukaryotic hsp90 molecular chaperone. Eur J Biochem 268:5258–5269, 2001.[Medline]
  261. Smith DF, Whitesell L, Nair SC, Chen S, Prapanich V, Rimerman RA. Progesterone receptor structure and function altered by geldanamycin, an hsp90-binding agent. Mol Cell Biol 15:6804–6812, 1995.
  262. Chen S, Smith DF. Hop as an adaptor in the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and Hsp90 chaperone machinery. J Biol Chem 273:35194–35200, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  263. Chang HJ, Nathan DF, Lindquist S. In vivo analysis of the hsp90 cochaperone Sti1 (p60). Mol Cell Biol 17:318–325, 1997.[Abstract]
  264. Vanaja DK, Mitchell SH, Toft DO, Young CYF. Effect of geldanamycin on androgen receptor function and stability. Cell Stress Chap 7:55–64, 2002.[Medline]
  265. Kimura Y, Yahara I, Lindquist S. Role of the protein chaperone YDJ1 in establishing hsp90-mediated signal transduction pathways. Science 268:1362–1365, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  266. Caplan AJ, Langley E, Wilson EM, Vidal J. Hormone-dependent transactivation by the human androgen receptor is regulated by a dnaJ protein. J Biol Chem 270:5251–5257, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  267. Fiss AE, Rao J, Melville MW, Cheetham ME, Caplan AJ. Domain requirements of DnaJ-like (hsp40) molecular chaperones in the activation of a steroid hormone receptor. J Biol Chem 274:34045–34052, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  268. Morishima Y, Murphy PJM, Li DP, Sanchez ER, Pratt WB. Stepwise assembly of a glucocorticoid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex resolves two sequential ATP-dependent events involving first hsp70 and then hsp90 in opening of the steroid binding pocket. J Biol Chem 275:18054–18060, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  269. Rajapandi T, Greene LE, Eisenberg E. The molecular chaperones hsp90 and hsc70 are both necessary and sufficient to activate hormone binding by glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem 275:22597–22604, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  270. Johnson JL, Toft DO. Binding of p23 and hsp90 during assembly with the progesterone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 9:670–678, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  271. Hernandez MP, Chadli A, Toft DO. Hsp40 binding is the first step in the hsp90 chaperoning pathway for the progesterone receptor. J Biol Chem 277:11873–11881, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  272. Kanalakis KC, Shewach DS, Pratt WB. Nucleotide binding states of hsp70 and hsp90 during sequential steps in the process of glucocorticoid receptor•hsp90 heterocomplex assembly. J Biol Chem 277:33698–33703, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  273. O’Brien MC, McKay DB. How potassium affects the activity of the molecular chaperone hsc70. I. Potassium is required for optimal ATPase activity. J Biol Chem 270:2247–2250, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  274. Wilbanks SM, McKay DB. How potassium affects the activity of the molecular chaperone hsc70. II. Potassium binds specifically in the ATPase active site. J Biol Chem 270:2251–2257, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  275. Kelley WL. The J-domain family and the recruitment of chaperone power. Trends Biochem Sci 23:222–227, 1998.[Medline]
  276. Scheibel T, Neuhofen S, Weikl T, Mayr C, Reinstein J, Vogel PD, Buchner J. ATP-binding properties of human hsp90. J Biol Chem 272:18608–18613, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  277. McLaughlin SH, Smith HW, Jackson SE. Stimulation of the weak ATPase activity of human hsp90 by client protein. J Mol Biol 315:787–798, 2002.[Medline]
  278. Owens-Grillo JK, Stancato LF, Hoffmann K, Pratt WB, Krishna P. Binding of immunophilins to the 90 kDa heat shock protein (hsp90) via a tetratricopeptide repeat domain is a conserved interaction in plants. Biochemistry 35:15249–15255, 1996.[Medline]
  279. Reddy RK, Kurek I, Silverstien AM, Chinkers M, Breiman A, Krishna P. High molecular-weight FK506-binding proteins are components of heat-shock protein 90 heterocomplexes in wheat germ lysates. Plant Physiol 118:1395–1401, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  280. Harrell JM, Kurek I, Breiman A, Radanyi C, Renoir JM, Pratt WB, Galigniana MD. All of the protein interactions that link steroid receptor•hsp90•immunophilin heterocomplexes to cytoplasmic dynein are common to plant and animal cells. Biochemistry 41:5581–5587, 2002.[Medline]
  281. DeFranco DB, Madan AP, Tang Y, Chandran UR, Xiao N, Yang J. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of steroid receptors. Vitam Horm 51:315–338, 1995.[Medline]
  282. Czar MJ, Galigniana MD, Silverstein AM, Pratt WB. Geldanamycin, a heat shock protein 90-binding benzoquinone ansamycin, inhibits steroid-dependent translocation of the glucocorticoid receptor from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Biochemistry 36:7776–7785, 1997.[Medline]
  283. Galigniana MD, Scruggs JL, Herrington J, Welsh MJ, Carter-Su C, Housley PR, Pratt WB. Heat shock protein 90-dependent (geldanamycin-inhibited) movement of the glucocorticoid receptor through the cytoplasm to the nucleus requires intact cytoskeleton. Mol Endocrinol 12:1903–1913, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  284. Czar MJ, Owens-Grillo JK, Yem AW, Leach KL, Deibel MR, Welsh MJ, Pratt WB. The hsp56 immunophilin component of untransformed steroid receptor complexes is localized both to microtubules in the cytoplasm and to the same nonrandom regions within the nucleus as the steroid receptor. Mol Endocrinol 8:1731–1741, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  285. Perrot-Applanat M, Cibert C, Geraud G, Renoir JM, Baulieu EE. The 59 kDa FK506-binding protein, a 90 kDa heat shock protein binding immunophilin (FKBP59-HBI), is associated with the nucleus, the cytoskeleton and mitotic apparatus. J Cell Sci 108:2037–2051, 1995.[Abstract]
  286. Czar MJ, Lyons RH, Welsh MJ, Renior JM, Pratt WB. Evidence that the FK506-binding immunophilin heat shock protein 56 is required for trafficking of the glucocorticoid receptor from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Mol Endocrinol 9:1549–1560, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  287. Galigniana MD, Radanyi C, Renoir JM, Housley PR, Pratt WB. Evidence that the peptidylprolyl isomerase domain of the hsp90-binding immunophilin FKBP52 is involved in both dynein interaction and glucocorticoid receptor movement to the nucleus. J Biol Chem 276:14884–14889, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  288. Davies TH, Ning YM, Sanchez ER. A new first step in activation of steroid receptors. Hormone-induced switching of FKBP51 and FKBP52 immunophilins. J Biol Chem 277:4597–4600, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  289. Walker RA, Sheetz MP. Cytoplasmic microtubule-associated motors. Annu Rev Biochem 62:429–451, 1993.[Medline]
  290. Galigniana MD, Harrell JM, Murphy PJM, Chinkers M, Radanyi C, Renoir JM, Zhang M, Pratt WB. Binding of hsp90-associated immunophilins to cytoplasmic dynein: direct binding and in vivo evidence that the peptidylprolyl isomerase domain is a dynein interaction domain. Biochemistry 41:13602–13610, 2002.[Medline]
  291. Carver LA, LaPres JJ, Jain S, Dunham EE, Bradfield CA. Characterization of the Ah receptor-associated protein, ARA9. J Biol Chem 273:33580–33587, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  292. Kazlauskas A, Poellinger L, Pongratz I. The immunophilin-like protein XAP2 regulates ubiquitination and subcellular localization of the dioxin receptor. J Biol Chem 275:41317–41324, 2000.
  293. Kazlauskas A, Sundstrom S, Poellinger L, Pongratz I. The hsp90 chaperone complex regulates intracellular localization of the dioxin receptor. Mol Cell Biol 21:2594–2607, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  294. Meyer BK, Perdew GH. Characterization of the AhR-hsp90-XAP2 core complex and the role of the immunophilin-related protein XAP2 in AhR stabilization. Biochemistry 38:8907–8917, 1999.[Medline]
  295. LaPres JJ, Glover E, Dunham EE, Bunger MK, Bradfield CA. ARA9 modifies agonist signaling through an increase in cytosolic aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J Biol Chem 275:6153–6159, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  296. Petrulis JR, Hord NG, Perdew GH. Subcellular localization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor is modulated by the immunophilin homolog hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2. J Biol Chem 275:37448–37453, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  297. Gupta RS, Golding B. The origin of the eukaryotic cell. Trends Biochem Sci 21:166–171, 1996.[Medline]
  298. Parsell DA, Lindquist S. The function of heat-shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins. Annu Rev Genet 27:437–496, 1993.[Medline]
  299. Billecke SS, Bender AT, Kanelakis KC, Murphy PJM, Lowe ER, Kamada Y, Pratt WB, Osawa Y. Hsp90 is required for heme binding and activation of apo-neuronal nitric-oxide synthase: geldanamycin-mediated oxidant generation is unrelated to any action of hsp90. J Biol Chem 277:20504–20509, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  300. Miyata Y, Chambraud B, Radanyi C, Leclerc J, Lebeau MC, Renoir JM, Shirai R, Catelli MG, Yahara I, Baulieu EE. Phosphorylation of the immunosuppressant FK506-binding protein FKBP52 by casein kinase II: regulation of hsp90-binding activity of FKBP52. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:14500–14505, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  301. Ko LJ, Prives C. p53 Puzzle and paradigm. Genes Devel 10:1054–1072, 1996.[Free Full Text]
  302. Levine AJ. p53 The cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell 88:323–331, 1997.[Medline]
  303. Giannakakou P, Sackett DL, Ward Y, Webster KR, Blagosklonny MV, Fojo T. p53 is associated with cellular microtubules and is transported to the nucleus by dynein. Nature Cell Biol 2:709–717, 2000.[Medline]
  304. Hu J, Toft D, Anselmo D, Wang X. In vitro reconstitution of functional hepadenovirus reverse transcriptase with cellular chaperone proteins. J Virol 76:269–279, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  305. Gee AC, Katzenellenbogen JA. Probing conformational changes in the estrogen receptor: evidence for a partially unfolded intermediate facilitating ligand binding and release. Mol Endo 15:421–428, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
C. MOSER, S. A. LANG, and O. STOELTZING
Heat-shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) as a Molecular Target for Therapy of Gastrointestinal Cancer
Anticancer Res, June 1, 2009; 29(6): 2031 - 2042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. Nguyen, N. Francoeur, V. Chartrand, K. Klarskov, G. Guillemette, and G. Boulay
Insulin Promotes the Association of Heat Shock Protein 90 with the Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor to Dampen Its Ca2+ Release Activity
Endocrinology, May 1, 2009; 150(5): 2190 - 2196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Ujino, S. Yamaguchi, K. Shimotohno, and H. Takaku
Heat-shock Protein 90 Is Essential for Stabilization of the Hepatitis C Virus Nonstructural Protein NS3
J. Biol. Chem., March 13, 2009; 284(11): 6841 - 6846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
K. Tokui, H. Adachi, M. Waza, M. Katsuno, M. Minamiyama, H. Doi, K. Tanaka, J. Hamazaki, S. Murata, F. Tanaka, et al.
17-DMAG ameliorates polyglutamine-mediated motor neuron degeneration through well-preserved proteasome function in an SBMA model mouse
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2009; 18(5): 898 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. De Bosscher and G. Haegeman
Minireview: Latest Perspectives on Antiinflammatory Actions of Glucocorticoids
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2009; 23(3): 281 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Matsumiya, T. Imaizumi, H. Yoshida, K. Satoh, M. K. Topham, and D. M. Stafforini
The Levels of Retinoic Acid-Inducible Gene I Are Regulated by Heat Shock Protein 90-{alpha}
J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 2717 - 2725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. E. Cowen, S. D. Singh, J. R. Kohler, C. Collins, A. K. Zaas, W. A. Schell, H. Aziz, E. Mylonakis, J. R. Perfect, L. Whitesell, et al.
Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease
PNAS, February 24, 2009; 106(8): 2818 - 2823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
X.-Y. Zhong, J.-H. Ding, J. A. Adams, G. Ghosh, and X.-D. Fu
Regulation of SR protein phosphorylation and alternative splicing by modulating kinetic interactions of SRPK1 with molecular chaperones
Genes & Dev., February 15, 2009; 23(4): 482 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
E. Meimaridou, S. B Gooljar, and J P. Chapple
From hatching to dispatching: the multiple cellular roles of the Hsp70 molecular chaperone machinery
J. Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2009; 42(1): 1 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
C. M.-E. Sauvageot, J. L. Weatherbee, S. Kesari, S. E. Winters, J. Barnes, J. Dellagatta, N. R. Ramakrishna, C. D. Stiles, A. L.-J. Kung, M. W. Kieran, et al.
Efficacy of the HSP90 inhibitor 17-AAG in human glioma cell lines and tumorigenic glioma stem cells
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2009; 11(2): 109 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Y. Tao, J. Hart, L. Lichtenstein, L. J. Joseph, M. J. Ciancio, S. Hu, E. B. Chang, and M. Bissonnette
Inducible heat shock protein 70 prevents multifocal flat dysplastic lesions and invasive tumors in an inflammatory model of colon cancer
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2009; 30(1): 175 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
Y. Morishima, A. M. Wang, Z. Yu, W. B. Pratt, Y. Osawa, and A. P. Lieberman
CHIP deletion reveals functional redundancy of E3 ligases in promoting degradation of both signaling proteins and expanded glutamine proteins
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 15, 2008; 17(24): 3942 - 3952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
E Rodriguez, J Guevara, A Paez, E Zapata, M. Collados, T. Fortoul, R Lopez-Marure, F Masso, and L. Montano
The altered expression of inflammation-related molecules and secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 by HUVEC from newborns with maternal inactive systemic lupus erythematosus is modified by estrogens
Lupus, December 1, 2008; 17(12): 1086 - 1095.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
G. A. Flom, M. Lemieszek, E. A. Fortunato, and J. L. Johnson
Farnesylation of Ydj1 Is Required for In Vivo Interaction with Hsp90 Client Proteins
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2008; 19(12): 5249 - 5258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
F. Willmund, K. V. Dorn, M. Schulz-Raffelt, and M. Schroda
The Chloroplast DnaJ Homolog CDJ1 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Is Part of a Multichaperone Complex Containing HSP70B, CGE1, and HSP90C
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2008; 148(4): 2070 - 2082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
A. Antonov, C. Snead, B. Gorshkov, G. N. Antonova, A. D. Verin, and J. D. Catravas
Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitors Protect and Restore Pulmonary Endothelial Barrier Function
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2008; 39(5): 551 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. D. McKeen, K. McAlpine, A. Valentine, D. J. Quinn, K. McClelland, C. Byrne, M. O'Rourke, S. Young, C. J. Scott, H. O. McCarthy, et al.
A Novel FK506-Like Binding Protein Interacts with the Glucocorticoid Receptor and Regulates Steroid Receptor Signaling
Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5724 - 5734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Tzankov, M. J. H. Wong, K. Shi, C. Nassif, and J. C. Young
Functional Divergence between Co-chaperones of Hsc70
J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2008; 283(40): 27100 - 27109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Becker, A. Sturm, J. E. Bron, K. Schirmer, and N. R. Bury
The A/B Domain of the Teleost Glucocorticoid Receptors Influences Partial Nuclear Localization in the Absence of Hormone
Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4567 - 4576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. Rao, W. Fiskus, Y. Yang, P. Lee, R. Joshi, P. Fernandez, A. Mandawat, P. Atadja, J. E. Bradner, and K. Bhalla
HDAC6 inhibition enhances 17-AAG-mediated abrogation of hsp90 chaperone function in human leukemia cells
Blood, September 1, 2008; 112(5): 1886 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. Nakashima, L. Chen, N. P. Thao, M. Fujiwara, H. L. Wong, M. Kuwano, K. Umemura, K. Shirasu, T. Kawasaki, and K. Shimamoto
RACK1 Functions in Rice Innate Immunity by Interacting with the Rac1 Immune Complex
PLANT CELL, August 1, 2008; 20(8): 2265 - 2279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. H. Wrighton, X. Lin, and X.-H. Feng
Critical regulation of TGF{beta} signaling by Hsp90
PNAS, July 8, 2008; 105(27): 9244 - 9249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. K. Wandinger, K. Richter, and J. Buchner
The Hsp90 Chaperone Machinery
J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 18473 - 18477.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Richter, J. Soroka, L. Skalniak, A. Leskovar, M. Hessling, J. Reinstein, and J. Buchner
Conserved Conformational Changes in the ATPase Cycle of Human Hsp90
J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2008; 283(26): 17757 - 17765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Colombo, G. Morra, M. Meli, and G. Verkhivker
Understanding ligand-based modulation of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone dynamics at atomic resolution
PNAS, June 10, 2008; 105(23): 7976 - 7981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
L. Matthews, A. Berry, V. Ohanian, J. Ohanian, H. Garside, and D. Ray
Caveolin Mediates Rapid Glucocorticoid Effects and Couples Glucocorticoid Action to the Antiproliferative Program
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 22(6): 1320 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
R. I. Morimoto
Proteotoxic stress and inducible chaperone networks in neurodegenerative disease and aging
Genes & Dev., June 1, 2008; 22(11): 1427 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
J. A. McLear, D. Lebrecht, A. Messer, and W. J. Wolfgang
Combinational approach of intrabody with enhanced Hsp70 expression addresses multiple pathologies in a fly model of Huntington's disease
FASEB J, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 2003 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Mukherjee, V. S. Negi, G. Keitany, Y. Tanaka, and K. Orth
In Vitro Activation of the I{kappa}B Kinase Complex by Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type-1 Tax
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15127 - 15133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
Q. Zhou, A. T. Agoston, P. Atadja, W. G. Nelson, and N. E. Davidson
Inhibition of Histone Deacetylases Promotes Ubiquitin-Dependent Proteasomal Degradation of DNA Methyltransferase 1 in Human Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 6(5): 873 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
L. E. Cowen and W. J. Steinbach
Stress, Drugs, and Evolution: the Role of Cellular Signaling in Fungal Drug Resistance
Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2008; 7(5): 747 - 764.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. Ran, M. Bali, and C. A. Michels
Hsp90/Hsp70 Chaperone Machine Regulation of the Saccharomyces MAL-Activator As Determined in Vivo Using Noninducible and Constitutive Mutant Alleles
Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 331 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Chadli, S. J. Felts, and D. O. Toft
GCUNC45 Is the First Hsp90 Co-chaperone to Show {alpha}/{beta} Isoform Specificity
J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 9509 - 9512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. J. M. Schaaf, D. Champagne, I. H. C. van Laanen, D. C. W. A. van Wijk, A. H. Meijer, O. C. Meijer, H. P. Spaink, and M. K. Richardson
Discovery of a Functional Glucocorticoid Receptor {beta}-Isoform in Zebrafish
Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1591 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. Hernandez, G. Lopez-Lluch, J. A. Bernal, P. Navas, and J. A. Pintor-Toro
Dicoumarol down-regulates human PTTG1/Securin mRNA expression through inhibition of Hsp90
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2008; 7(3): 474 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
G. P. Lotz, A. Brychzy, S. Heinz, and W. M. J. Obermann
A novel HSP90 chaperone complex regulates intracellular vesicle transport
J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2008; 121(5): 717 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. A. Sangster, N. Salathia, H. N. Lee, E. Watanabe, K. Schellenberg, K. Morneau, H. Wang, S. Undurraga, C. Queitsch, and S. Lindquist
HSP90-buffered genetic variation is common in Arabidopsis thaliana
PNAS, February 26, 2008; 105(8): 2969 - 2974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Floer, G. O. Bryant, and M. Ptashne
HSP90/70 chaperones are required for rapid nucleosome removal upon induction of the GAL genes of yeast
PNAS, February 26, 2008; 105(8): 2975 - 2980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
R. Zhao, Y. Kakihara, A. Gribun, J. Huen, G. Yang, M. Khanna, M. Costanzo, R. L. Brost, C. Boone, T. R. Hughes, et al.
Molecular chaperone Hsp90 stabilizes Pih1/Nop17 to maintain R2TP complex activity that regulates snoRNA accumulation
J. Cell Biol., February 6, 2008; 180(3): 563 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Sidera, M. Gaitanou, D. Stellas, R. Matsas, and E. Patsavoudi
A Critical Role for HSP90 in Cancer Cell Invasion Involves Interaction with the Extracellular Domain of HER-2
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2031 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. L. Riggs, M. B. Cox, H. L. Tardif, M. Hessling, J. Buchner, and D. F. Smith
Noncatalytic Role of the FKBP52 Peptidyl-Prolyl Isomerase Domain in the Regulation of Steroid Hormone Signaling
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2007; 27(24): 8658 - 8669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Frey, A. Leskovar, J. Reinstein, and J. Buchner
The ATPase Cycle of the Endoplasmic Chaperone Grp94
J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 35612 - 35620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. B. Cox, D. L. Riggs, M. Hessling, F. Schumacher, J. Buchner, and D. F. Smith
FK506-Binding Protein 52 Phosphorylation: A Potential Mechanism for Regulating Steroid Hormone Receptor Activity
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 2956 - 2967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
N. P. Thao, L. Chen, A. Nakashima, S.-i. Hara, K. Umemura, A. Takahashi, K. Shirasu, T. Kawasaki, and K. Shimamoto
RAR1 and HSP90 Form a Complex with Rac/Rop GTPase and Function in Innate-Immune Responses in Rice
PLANT CELL, December 1, 2007; 19(12): 4035 - 4045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Hinz, M. Broemer, S. C. Arslan, A. Otto, E.-C. Mueller, R. Dettmer, and C. Scheidereit
Signal Responsiveness of I{kappa}B Kinases Is Determined by Cdc37-assisted Transient Interaction with Hsp90
J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2007; 282(44): 32311 - 32319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. C. Arthur, J. D. Lich, R. K. Aziz, M. Kotb, and J. P.-Y. Ting
Heat Shock Protein 90 Associates with Monarch-1 and Regulates Its Ability to Promote Degradation of NF-{kappa}B-Inducing Kinase
J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 6291 - 6296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
C. Moser, S. A. Lang, S. Kainz, A. Gaumann, S. Fichtner-Feigl, G. E. Koehl, H. J. Schlitt, E. K. Geissler, and O. Stoeltzing
Blocking heat shock protein-90 inhibits the invasive properties and hepatic growth of human colon cancer cells and improves the efficacy of oxaliplatin in p53-deficient colon cancer tumors in vivo
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2007; 6(11): 2868 - 2878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
M. Boter, B. Amigues, J. Peart, C. Breuer, Y. Kadota, C. Casais, G. Moore, C. Kleanthous, F. Ochsenbein, K. Shirasu, et al.
Structural and Functional Analysis of SGT1 Reveals That Its Interaction with HSP90 Is Required for the Accumulation of Rx, an R Protein Involved in Plant Immunity
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2007; 19(11): 3791 - 3804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Panner, J. C. Murray, M. S. Berger, and R. O. Pieper
Heat Shock Protein 90{alpha} Recruits FLIPS to the Death-Inducing Signaling Complex and Contributes to TRAIL Resistance in Human Glioma
Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9482 - 9489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Chatterjee, C. Dimitropoulou, F. Drakopanayiotakis, G. Antonova, C. Snead, J. Cannon, R. C. Venema, and J. D. Catravas
Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitors Prolong Survival, Attenuate Inflammation, and Reduce Lung Injury in Murine Sepsis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2007; 176(7): 667 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Stahl, M. Retzlaff, M. Nassal, and J. Beck
Chaperone activation of the hepadnaviral reverse transcriptase for template RNA binding is established by the Hsp70 and stimulated by the Hsp90 system
Nucleic Acids Res., September 25, 2007; 35(18): 6124 - 6136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Shahi, K. Gulshan, and W. S. Moye-Rowley
Negative Transcriptional Regulation of Multidrug Resistance Gene Expression by an Hsp70 Protein
J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 26822 - 26831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
A. Amiri, F. Noei, T. Feroz, and J. M. Lee
Geldanamycin Anisimycins Activate Rho and Stimulate Rho- and ROCK-Dependent Actin Stress Fiber Formation
Mol. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 5(9): 933 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
W. Qi, X. Chen, R. E. Gilbert, Y. Zhang, M. Waltham, M. Schache, D. J. Kelly, and C. A. Pollock
High Glucose-Induced Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein in Renal Proximal Tubule Cells Is Independent of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 171(3): 744 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. K. Bhangoo, S. Tzankov, A. C.Y. Fan, K. Dejgaard, D. Y. Thomas, and J. C. Young
Multiple 40-kDa Heat-Shock Protein Chaperones Function in Tom70-dependent Mitochondrial Import
Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2007; 18(9): 3414 - 3428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. A. McLellan, T. J. Turbyville, E.M. K. Wijeratne, A. Kerschen, E. Vierling, C. Queitsch, L. Whitesell, and A.A. L. Gunatilaka
A Rhizosphere Fungus Enhances Arabidopsis Thermotolerance through Production of an HSP90 Inhibitor
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2007; 145(1): 174 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. M. Castorena, S. A. Weeks, K. A. Stapleford, A. M. Cadwallader, and D. J. Miller
A Functional Heat Shock Protein 90 Chaperone Is Essential for Efficient Flock House Virus RNA Polymerase Synthesis in Drosophila Cells
J. Virol., August 15, 2007; 81(16): 8412 - 8420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. E. Walker, R. Atanasiu, H. Lam, and A. Shrier
Co-chaperone FKBP38 Promotes HERG Trafficking
J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2007; 282(32): 23509 - 23516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
M. Ren, A. Santhanam, P. Lee, A. Caplan, and S. Garrett
Alteration of the Protein Kinase Binding Domain Enhances Function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular Chaperone Cdc37
Eukaryot. Cell, August 1, 2007; 6(8): 1363 - 1372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. K. Lovgren, M. Kovarova, and B. H. Koller
cPGES/p23 Is Required for Glucocorticoid Receptor Function and Embryonic Growth but Not Prostaglandin E2 Synthesis
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2007; 27(12): 4416 - 4430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
L. M. Karnitz and S. J. Felts
Cdc37 Regulation of the Kinome: When to Hold 'Em and When to Fold 'Em
Sci. Signal., May 8, 2007; 2007(385): pe22 - pe22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. K. Bhattarai, Q. Li, Y. Liu, S. P. Dinesh-Kumar, and I. Kaloshian
The Mi-1-Mediated Pest Resistance Requires Hsp90 and Sgt1
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2007; 144(1): 312 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. Basto, F. Gergely, V. M. Draviam, H. Ohkura, K. Liley, and J. W. Raff
Hsp90 is required to localise cyclin B and Msps/ch-TOG to the mitotic spindle in Drosophila and humans
J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2007; 120(7): 1278 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. H. Meijsing, C. Elbi, H. F. Luecke, G. L. Hager, and K. R. Yamamoto
The Ligand Binding Domain Controls Glucocorticoid Receptor Dynamics Independent of Ligand Release
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2007; 27(7): 2442 - 2451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. M. Wright, S. W. Fewell, M. L. Sullivan, J. M. Pipas, S. C. Watkins, and J. L. Brodsky
The Hsp40 Molecular Chaperone Ydj1p, Along With the Protein Kinase C Pathway, Affects Cell-Wall Integrity in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1649 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Salim and D. C. Eikenburg
Role of 90-kDa Heat Shock Protein (Hsp 90) and Protein Degradation in Regulating Neuronal Levels of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 3
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2007; 320(3): 1106 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
Y. Chen, M. P. Schnetz, C. E. Irarrazabal, R.-F. Shen, C. K. Williams, M. B. Burg, and J. D. Ferraris
Proteomic identification of proteins associated with the osmoregulatory transcription factor TonEBP/OREBP: functional effects of Hsp90 and PARP-1
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): F981 - F992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. Hong, S. T. Kim, S. Tranguch, D. F Smith, and S. K Dey
Deficiency of co-chaperone immunophilin FKBP52 compromises sperm fertilizing capacity
Reproduction, February 1, 2007; 133(2): 395 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
T. Naito, F. Momose, A. Kawaguchi, and K. Nagata
Involvement of Hsp90 in Assembly and Nuclear Import of Influenza Virus RNA Polymerase Subunits
J. Virol., February 1, 2007; 81(3): 1339 - 1349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
R. Jasavala, H. Martinez, J. Thumar, A. Andaya, A.-C. Gingras, J. K. Eng, R. Aebersold, D. K. Han, and M. E. Wright
Identification of Putative Androgen Receptor Interaction Protein Modules: Cytoskeleton and Endosomes Modulate Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, February 1, 2007; 6(2): 252 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. L. Johnson, A. Halas, and G. Flom
Nucleotide-Dependent Interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp90 with the Cochaperone Proteins Sti1, Cpr6, and Sba1
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2007; 27(2): 768 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
R. Geller, M. Vignuzzi, R. Andino, and J. Frydman
Evolutionary constraints on chaperone-mediated folding provide an antiviral approach refractory to development of drug resistance
Genes & Dev., January 15, 2007; 21(2): 195 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. L. Arnett-Mansfield, J. D. Graham, A. R. Hanson, P. A. Mote, A. Gompel, L. L. Scurr, N. Gava, A. de Fazio, and C. L. Clarke
Focal Subnuclear Distribution of Progesterone Receptor Is Ligand Dependent and Associated with Transcriptional Activity
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2007; 21(1): 14 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Fang, D. Ricketson, L. Getubig, and B. Darimont
Unliganded and hormone-bound glucocorticoid receptors interact with distinct hydrophobic sites in the Hsp90 C-terminal domain
PNAS, December 5, 2006; 103(49): 18487 - 18492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
I. Grad, T. A. McKee, S. M. Ludwig, G. W. Hoyle, P. Ruiz, W. Wurst, T. Floss, C. A. Miller III, and D. Picard
The Hsp90 Cochaperone p23 Is Essential for Perinatal Survival
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2006; 26(23): 8976 - 8983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. E. Baker
Evolution of metamorphosis: role of environment on expression of mutant nuclear receptors and other signal-transduction proteins
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 808 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
L. E. Cowen, A. E. Carpenter, O. Matangkasombut, G. R. Fink, and S. Lindquist
Genetic Architecture of Hsp90-Dependent Drug Resistance
Eukaryot. Cell, December 1, 2006; 5(12): 2184 - 2188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. Hawle, M. Siepmann, A. Harst, M. Siderius, H. P. Reusch, and W. M. J. Obermann
The Middle Domain of Hsp90 Acts as a Discriminator between Different Types of Client Proteins
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2006; 26(22): 8385 - 8395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. C. Y. Fan, M. K. Bhangoo, and J. C. Young
Hsp90 Functions in the Targeting and Outer Membrane Translocation Steps of Tom70-mediated Mitochondrial Import
J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33313 - 33324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. G. Evans, S. Wisen, and J. E. Gestwicki
Heat Shock Proteins 70 and 90 Inhibit Early Stages of Amyloid beta-(1-42) Aggregation in Vitro
J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33182 - 33191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
L.G. Wang, X.M. Liu, and J.W. Chiao
Repression of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells by phenethyl isothiocyanate
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 2124 - 2132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. S. Cintron and D. Toft
Defining the Requirements for Hsp40 and Hsp70 in the Hsp90 Chaperone Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., September 8, 2006; 281(36): 26235 - 26244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Murtagh, H. Lu, and E. L. Schwartz
Taxotere-Induced Inhibition of Human Endothelial Cell Migration Is a Result of Heat Shock Protein 90 Degradation
Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 66(16): 8192 - 8199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. Y. Chen and W. E. Balch
The Hsp90 Chaperone Complex Regulates GDI-dependent Rab Recycling
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2006; 17(8): 3494 - 3507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. R. Keppler, A. T. Grady, and M. B. Jarstfer
The Biochemical Role of the Heat Shock Protein 90 Chaperone Complex in Establishing Human Telomerase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2006; 281(29): 19840 - 19848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Shinozaki, M. Minami, T. Chiba, M. Suzuki, K. Yoshimatsu, Y. Ichikawa, K. Terasawa, Y. Emori, K. Matsumoto, T. Kurosaki, et al.
Depletion of Hsp90beta Induces Multiple Defects in B Cell Receptor Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16361 - 16369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. Thomas, J. M. Harrell, Y. Morishima, H.-M. Peng, W. B. Pratt, and A. P. Lieberman
Pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of hsp90-dependent trafficking reduces aggregation and promotes degradation of the expanded glutamine androgen receptor without stress protein induction
Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2006; 15(11): 1876 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
R. Li, J. Soosairajah, D. Harari, A. Citri, J. Price, H. L. Ng, C. J. Morton, M. W. Parker, Y. Yarden, and O. Bernard
Hsp90 increases LIM kinase activity by promoting its homo-dimerization
FASEB J, June 1, 2006; 20(8): 1218 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Citri, D. Harari, G. Shohat, P. Ramakrishnan, J. Gan, S. Lavi, M. Eisenstein, A. Kimchi, D. Wallach, S. Pietrokovski, et al.
Hsp90 Recognizes a Common Surface on Client Kinases
J. Biol. Chem., May 19, 2006; 281(20): 14361 - 14369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. T. Gooljarsingh, C. Fernandes, K. Yan, H. Zhang, M. Grooms, K. Johanson, R. H. Sinnamon, R. B. Kirkpatrick, J. Kerrigan, T. Lewis, et al.
A biochemical rationale for the anticancer effects of Hsp90 inhibitors: Slow, tight binding inhibition by geldanamycin and its analogues
PNAS, May 16, 2006; 103(20): 7625 - 7630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. Terasawa, K. Yoshimatsu, S.-i. Iemura, T. Natsume, K. Tanaka, and Y. Minami
Cdc37 interacts with the glycine-rich loop of hsp90 client kinases.
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2006; 26(9): 3378 - 3389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Richter, S. Moser, F. Hagn, R. Friedrich, O. Hainzl, M. Heller, S. Schlee, H. Kessler, J. Reinstein, and J. Buchner
Intrinsic Inhibition of the Hsp90 ATPase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 11301 - 11311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. D. Westerheide, T. L. A. Kawahara, K. Orton, and R. I. Morimoto
Triptolide, an Inhibitor of the Human Heat Shock Response That Enhances Stress-induced Cell Death
J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9616 - 9622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
X. Cen, A. Nitta, S. Ohya, Y. Zhao, N. Ozawa, A. Mouri, D. Ibi, L. Wang, M. Suzuki, K. Saito, et al.
An analog of a dipeptide-like structure of FK506 increases glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor expression through cAMP response element-binding protein activated by heat shock protein 90/Akt signaling pathway.
J. Neurosci., March 22, 2006; 26(12): 3335 - 3344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Chadli, J. D. Graham, M. G. Abel, T. A. Jackson, D. F. Gordon, W. M. Wood, S. J. Felts, K. B. Horwitz, and D. Toft
GCUNC-45 Is a Novel Regulator for the Progesterone Receptor/hsp90 Chaperoning Pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(5): 1722 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Tsapara, K. Matter, and M. S. Balda
The Heat-Shock Protein Apg-2 Binds to the Tight Junction Protein ZO-1 and Regulates Transcriptional Activity of ZONAB
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2006; 17(3): 1322 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Cohen-Saidon, I. Carmi, A. Keren, and E. Razin
Antiapoptotic function of Bcl-2 in mast cells is dependent on its association with heat shock protein 90beta
Blood, February 15, 2006; 107(4): 1413 - 1420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. J. H. Arlander, S. J. Felts, J. M. Wagner, B. Stensgard, D. O. Toft, and L. M. Karnitz
Chaperoning Checkpoint Kinase 1 (Chk1), an Hsp90 Client, with Purified Chaperones
J. Biol. Chem., February 3, 2006; 281(5): 2989 - 2998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Shang and T. B. Tomasi
The Heat Shock Protein 90-CDC37 Chaperone Complex Is Required for Signaling by Types I and II Interferons
J. Biol. Chem., January 27, 2006; 281(4): 1876 - 1884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Toft, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Toft, D. O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS