|
|
||||||||
The Genetic Centers of America, Silver Spring, Maryland 20905
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: autism neurodevelopmental disorders thimerosal VAERS
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The hypothesis that exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines could be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders is not established and rests on indirect and incomplete information, primarily from analogies with methylmercury and levels of maximum mercury exposure from vaccines given in children. The hypothesis is biologically possible, but the possible relationship between thimerosal from vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders of autism, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and speech or language delay remains seriously suspect. As of the present, there are no peer-reviewed epidemiological studies in the scientific literature examining the potential association between thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we show the first epidemiologic evidence, based upon tens of millions of doses of vaccine administered in the United States, that associates increasing thimerosal from vaccines with neurodevelopmental disorders.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The neurodevelopmental disorders we analyzed in this study were autism, mental retardation, and speech disorders. These categories of adverse reactions were based upon descriptions of adverse reactions by those reporting them and by defined fields contained in the VAERS database. We determined the number of male and female reaction reports, the mean and standard deviation of age in years, and the mean and standard deviation of onset in days in those experiencing neurodevelopmental disorders after thimerosal-containing and thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines.
We hypothesize that DTaP vaccines, whether containing thimerosal or not, should have a similar incidence rate of adverse reactions. We analyzed DTaP administered by manufacturer so that we could compare thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines administered from 1992 through 2000 against thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines administered from 1997 through 2000. We used denominators obtained from the Biological Surveillance Summaries of the CDC to determine the number of doses of each manufacturer administered and, based upon this information, we were able to calculate incidence rates of adverse reactions after vaccination. We are precluded from giving incidence rates, the number of doses administered, or types of DTaP vaccine because this information could reveal the identities of the manufacturers and the CDC claims this information is proprietary between them and the manufacturers (7).
We compared the incidence of adverse reactions after thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines against thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines to determine relative risk (RR), attributable risk, percent association, and statistical significance. The RR value was obtained by dividing the incidence rate of the adverse reaction after thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines by the incidence rate of the adverse reaction after thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines ([adverse reaction incidence after thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines]/[incidence rate after thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines] = RR). The attributable risk value was determined by subtracting 1 from the RR value (RR 1 = attributable risk). Percent association was calculated by dividing the RR value by the RR value plus 1 and multiplying this computed value by 100 ([RR /{RR + 1}] x 100). Statistical significance was determined by using Fishers Exact Test. Our null hypothesis was that there would be a statistically similar incidence rate of adverse reactions after thimerosal-containing and thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines. We assumed that the incidence of adverse reactions after thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines was the expected rate and the incidence of adverse reactions after thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines was the observed rate. The statistical package contained in Correls Quattro Pro was used, and a P value of 0.05 was considered significant.
In addition, to determine if there were potential biases in our data, we used several controls. We examined the overall mean and standard deviation of the ages of thimerosal-containing and thimerosal-free DTaP vaccine adverse reactions reported to the VAERS to ensure that both types of vaccines were administered to similar-aged populations because different-aged populations may have a difference in the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders. The mean ages of those reporting neurodevelopmental disorders after vaccination may also help to determine whether successive doses of thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines build up concentrations of thimerosal to toxic levels, resulting in neurodevelopmental disorders in vaccine recipients. The usual course of DTaP vaccine in children consists of primary immunizations administered at 2, 4, and 6 months, followed up by booster doses at 18 months and at 5 years. We also examined the incidence rate of acute adverse reactions reported to the VAERS database after thimerosal-containing and thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines, including deaths, seizures, vasculitis, emergency department (ED) visits, total reaction reports, and gastroenteritis. This control served several purposes. First, if differences in manufacturing processes, other than the presence of thimerosal were present, there is a reasonable probability that this might have a significant impact on the incidence rate of acute adverse reactions. Second, if biased increased reporting rates of adverse reactions were present for thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines, this would be reflected in an increased incidence rate of acute adverse reactions after thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines in comparison with thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines. The years examined in this study also help to preclude the possibility of reporting biases based upon popular media publicity of an association between thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders in recent years because thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines were analyzed for much earlier years (19922000) than were thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines (19972000).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A study performed by Magos et al. (8) in rats compared the effects of the administration of similar doses of ethylmercury and methylmercury. They found that higher concentrations of inorganic mercury in the kidneys and brain were present in ethylmercury-treated rats compared with methylmercury-treated rats. They determined that there was little difference in the neurotoxicites of ethylmercury- and methylmercury-treated rats when effects on the dorsal root ganglia or coordination disorders were compared. The authors also determined that microgram quantities of organic mercury alone in the rat brain were in some cases associated with neurotoxicity, indicating that the presence of inorganic mercury was not necessary for neurotoxicity.
The long mean onset times observed in this study for neurodevelopmental disorders after thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines from about 8 to 22 days may be indicative of the decomposition rates of thimerosal. It has been shown by Tan and Parkin (9) that thimerosal in vitro decomposes in the presence of sodium chloride at approximately 4.3% per day. This means that during the 8- to 22-day temporal period of onset observed in this study for neurodevelopmental disorders, approximately 34.4% to 94.6% of the thimerosal had decomposed into its derivatives. The authors also report that it would be expected that the ethylmercury would display similar complexion and chemical characteristics to methylmercury. Therefore, considering that sodium chloride is integrally involved in the functioning of the nervous system and kidneys, is not potentially surprising that mercury accumulates in these organs, and in the brain, this accumulation manifests itself in the form of neurodevelopmental disorders in some children.
Bernard et al. (10) compared the similar biological abnormalities commonly found in autism and the corresponding pathologies arising from mercury exposure. Distinct similarities were found between autism and mercury exposure in their effects upon biochemistry, the immune system, the central nervous system structure, neurochemistry, and neurophysiology. The authors report that mercury toxicity shows great variability in its effects on the individual, so that at the same exposure level, some will be affected severely, whereas others will be asymptomatic. They provide the example of acrodynia, which arose in the early 20th century, resulting from the use of mercury teething powders, which afflicted only 1 in 500 to 1000 children given the same low dose. The authors conclude that due to the extensive parallels observed between autism and mercury exposure from thimerosal present in currently used vaccines, the likelihood of a causal relationship is great.
We were initially highly skeptical that differences in the concentrations of thimerosal in vaccines would have any effect on the incidence rate of neurodevelopmental disorders after childhood immunization. However, the results of our analysis suggest that children who received an additional 75 to 100 µg of thimerosal from thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines may have an associated increase in neurodevelopmental disorders based upon analysis of the VAERS database. Despite showing similarities in the ages of vaccine recipients between thimerosal-containing and thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines, similarities in the incidence rate of acute control reactions after thimerosal-containing and thimerosal-free DTaP vaccines and a increased age of onset of neurodevelopmental disorders in those receiving thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines, there may be factors other than thimerosal concentrations that potentially lead to differences in the incidence rates of neurodevelopmental disorders observed in this study.
The relative infrequency of neurodevelopmental disorders observed after thimerosal-containing vaccination may in part reflect the fact that the association between thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders was not known among those physicians and therefore was underreported to the VAERS database, and, in addition, may indicate that other factors than just thimerosal may effect the incidence rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. These factors may include the possibility that mercury is cleared at different rates, susceptibility among children may change with age or developmental status, and there may be variation in genetic composition among different children. It is possible that these factors may work independently, or more probably, may work synergistically to produce a neurodevelopmental response in a susceptible child.
It has also been hypothesized by Wakefield et al. (11, 12) that there may be a specific viral pathogenic mechanism for a new variant of inflammatory bowel disease among children with developmental disorders. They have recently shown a statistical increase in the detection of measles viral genes in gastrointestinal tissues in children with neurodevelopmental conditions in comparison with a control population (12). Krause et al. (13) have reported that various immune system abnormalities, including autoimmunity and defects in different subsets of immune cells, have been reported in children with autistic disorders, suggesting that immune factors may also play a role in the development of autism.
In light of the fact that many additional factors may play a potential role in the development of neurodevelopmental disorders in children, the observed statistical increase in neurodevelopmental disorders in children receiving thimerosal-containing DTaP vaccines may reflect a synergistic effect of multiple factors in a susceptible child. We recommend that additional studies be conducted to confirm and extend the results of this study. We suggest that even though there may be other factors related to the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders in children, manufacturers should consider removing thimerosal from vaccines either by using another preservative or by producing single dose vials so that no preservative is necessary, for it is better to be safe than sorry. Despite these negative findings concerning the preservative thimerosal, vaccination has been and will continue to be an invaluable asset to control potentially debilitating and deadly infectious diseases.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at The Genetic Centers of America, 14 Redgate Court, Silver Spring, MD 20905. E-mail: mgeier{at}erols.com ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Schechter and J. K. Grether Continuing Increases in Autism Reported to California's Developmental Services System: Mercury in Retrograde Arch Gen Psychiatry, January 1, 2008; 65(1): 19 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Goodman and J. Nordin Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System Reporting Source: A Possible Source of Bias in Longitudinal Studies Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): 387 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Goin-Kochel and B. J. Myers Congenital Versus Regressive Onset of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Parents' Beliefs About Causes Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, January 1, 2005; 20(3): 169 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Parker, B. Schwartz, J. Todd, and L. K. Pickering Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines and Autistic Spectrum Disorder: A Critical Review of Published Original Data Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 793 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Geier and M. R. Geier Response to Comments by J.R. Mann Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2003; 228(9): 993 - 994. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |