|
|
||||||||
,
,
,
,
,
,||,1
* Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Technology,
Southwestern Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center,
Center for Biotechnology and Bioinformatics,
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688; and || Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at 2601 North Floyd Road, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083. E-mail: Sgoodmn{at}utdallas.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: sickle cell disease RBC membrane proteins proteomics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we analyzed quantitative changes in the RBC membrane proteome caused by SCD. Protein profiling was performed by the two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2D DIGE) technique in combination with LC/MS/MS.
| Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein Labeling.
Membrane proteins (0.08 mg) solubilized in lysis buffer were minimally labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 fluorophores (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) according to the manufacturers protocol. The control AA and SS proteins were derived from the blood samples collected from a single healthy donor (adult male) and sickle cell patient (18-year-old male), respectively. Equal amounts of SS and control AA proteins (0.08 mg each) labeled with the two different fluorophores (Cy5 and Cy3, respectively) were mixed before separation on a 2D gel in a sample/control (or SS/AA) experiment. In a parallel control/control (or AA/AA) experiment, equal amounts of the same control AA proteins (0.08 mg each) labeled with two different fluorophores were mixed and analyzed. To confirm the differences in SS/AA protein contents observed in the first experiment, the second sample/control experiment was carried out using the same control AA and SS proteins and similar labeling.
2D Gel Electrophoresis.
Mixtures of labeled proteins (total 0.16 mg) were separated by 2D gel electrophoresis as described (8). The first dimension, isoelectric focusing (IEF), was performed in a 13-cm Immobiline DryStrip with a nonlinear pH 310 gradient using Ettan IPGphor II (Amersham Biosciences) at 20°C. Immobiline strip rehydration was performed for 12 hrs in a rehydration buffer (1% Pharmalyte 310 NL, 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% ASB 14, and 2 mg/ml dithiothreitol-DTT) containing 0.16 mg mix of Cy3-and Cy5-labeled proteins. Isoelectric focusing was performed in three steps: at 500 V for 1 hr, at 1000 V for 1 hr, and at 8000 V for 33,300 V·hr. Prior to second dimension, Immobiline strip with separated proteins was equilibrated and reduced in a solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.6 buffer, 2% SDS, 30% glycerol, and 5 mg/ml DTT at 90°C for 1 min followed by an equilibration and protein alkylation (carbamidomethylation) at room temperature in a solution with the same Tris-HCl buffer containing 6 M urea, 2% SDS, 30% glycerol, and 20 mg/ml iodoacetamide for 10 min. After equilibration and alkylation, the proteins separated by IEF were further separated by SDS-PAGE on a 10% polyacrylamide gel. The separation was performed in a Hoefer SE 600 unit (Amersham Biosciences) at 25 mA/gel constant current until the dye front migrated out of the gel. Where indicated, the gels were stained with Sypro Ruby (Molecular Probes) according to the manufacturers protocol.
Gel Image Analysis.
The separated proteins labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 fluorophores were detected in gels using a 2920 2D-Master Imager (Amersham Biosciences). After detection, the identical Cy3- and Cy5-labeled proteins migrating to the same 2D spot were quantified based on the corresponding fluorescence intensities, and their molar ratios were calculated using DeCyder Differential In-Gel Analysis software (Amersham Biosciences).
Protein Identification.
Selected 2D gel spots were analyzed for protein identification. Proteins were identified through identification of corresponding tryptic peptides. The selected spots were excised from Sypro Rubystained 2D gels using Ettan Spot Picker (Amersham Biosciences). Proteins in the excised gel pieces were digested using in-gel trypsin digestion kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and corresponding tryptic digests (~0.025 ml) were collected according to the manufacturers protocol. Peptides in each tryptic digest were separated and identified by LC/MS/MS and database search.
Mass Spectrometry.
The LC/MS/MS analysis was performed using a Surveyor high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system connected through PepFinder kit (with peptide trap and 99:1 flow splitter) to a LCQ DECA XP ion trap mass spectrometer with a nanospray ionization source (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA). Peptides in the tryptic digest (5 µl) were separated by reverse-phase HPLC on a PicoFrit BioBasic C18 column (New Objectives, 0.075 x 100 mm) at 0.7 µl/min flow rate. Water and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid each were used as solvents A and B, respectively. The gradient was started and kept for 10 min at 0% B, then ramped to 60% B in 60 min, and finally ramped to 90% B for another 15 min. The eluted peptides were analyzed in data-dependent MS experiments ("big three") with dynamic exclusion (6). The spray voltage was set at 1.6 kV; the ion transfer capillary temperature was set at 180°C.
Database Search.
Each acquired MS/MS spectrum was searched against the NCBI nonredundant protein sequence database (nr.fasta, May 2004), using the SEQUEST software tool (9, 10). Database search parameters and peptide identification criteria used were as described (6). The proteins were identified through at least three identified tryptic peptides.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Frequency distribution of SS/AA ratios determined in different spots of 2D gel is presented in Figure 1
. From over 500 analyzed gel spots, we selected those where the SS protein was changed by at least 2.5-fold as compared to the AA counterpart. The changes, found in 49 of the selected gel spots, were confirmed in the second sample/control experiment, carried out with the same control AA and SS proteins. In 38 cases we observed an increase in the SS sickle cell membrane and in 11 cases a decrease. These 49 gel spots were selected for further analysis for protein identification. Using the Ettan Spot Picker, we were able to localize 40 (out of 49) selected protein spots on the Sypro Rubystained 2D gel, excise them, and analyze them for protein identification. No protein was identified in two of the 40 analyzed gel spots. The 2D gel and 38 spots where proteins were identified are shown in Figure 2
.
|
|
|
Three of the identified proteins were found in more than one gel spot corresponding to different molecular masses: protein 4.1 (gi 14916944) was found in spots 3, 48, and 9; chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 2 (gi 5453603), in spots 13, 16, and 29; and chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 6A (zeta) (gi 4502643), in spots 14 and 15. In general, this may reflect post-translational modifications in a protein altering its molecular mass (e.g., glycosylation), alternative splice forms, or partial degradation of a protein. For the proteins mentioned, alternative transcriptional splice variants of the gene have been observed (1113). Ankyrin (molecular mass ~200 kDa) was found in gel spots 1 and 2 corresponding to a molecular mass of 92.2 kDa. These spots most probably represent partial degradation products of ankyrin. We have previously described a degradation product of ankyrin at this molecular mass (14, 15). More than one protein was found in gel spots 15, 19, 20, 21, and 38. In such cases, the determined SS/AA ratio may reflect (i) the similar difference in SS/AA contents for all found proteins or (ii) the minimal difference in SS/AA contents for at least one protein, though we cannot specify which one(s). In the 38 analyzed gel spots, we identified 44 proteins representing 22 original protein sequences. It should be noted that a 2D gel spot may represent one of several possible modifications to a specific protein. Therefore, a significant change found in the quantity of such a protein spot may be the result of a quantitative redistribution of the proteins modifications or protein content. For the red blood cell, which lacks the ability to synthesize protein, a change in content would require a difference in protein synthesis or degradation during erythropoiesis.
The majority of proteins that change at least 2.5-fold fall into small groups of related proteins in the following five categories: actin accessory proteinsfour proteins, components of lipid raftstwo proteins, scavengers of oxygen radicalstwo proteins, protein repair participantssix proteins, and protein turnover componentsthree proteins. The 22 identified original proteins and protein categories are listed in Table 2
. It should be noted that chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 7 (eta) (gi 5453607), and T-complex protein 1, delta (gi 1729870), were found in the same 2D gel spot with SS/AA ratios of higher than 2.5. We included both proteins in one of the protein groups listed in Table 2
, though we cannot exclude the possibility that the determined difference in the SS/AA content is a characteristic of only one of the two proteins. The same is true for other gel spots that also contain multiple proteins, as indicated in Table 2
. Of the four proteins of actin accessory group, tropomyosin and dematin are essential components of the RBC membrane skeleton attached to the membrane via ankyrin and protein 4.1 (16). The protein repair participants group includes members of the heat shock protein 70-kDa family and the chaperonin containing TCP1 complex. The complex also known as the TCP1 ring complex (TRiC) consists of two identical stacked rings, each containing eight different proteins (13). Unfolded polypeptides including actin and tubulin enter the central cavity of the complex and are folded in an ATP-dependent manner (13). The heat shock proteins mediate the folding of newly translated polypeptides and in cooperation with other chaperones stabilize preexistent proteins against aggregation (17). Flotilin 1 and stomatin (band 7.2) are major proteins of lipid rafts, detergent-resistant, cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich membrane domains that are involved in important cellular processes such as signal transduction and intracellular trafficking (18, 19). Stomatin is also a regulator of monovalent cation flux across the membrane (20). Oxygen radical scavengers, peroxiredoxins are a family of antioxidant enzymes controlling hydrogen peroxide content and play a protective role in cells (21). All observed protein turnover components are proteasome subunits. The proteasome is a multicatalytic proteinase complex distributed throughout eukaryotic cells and cleaves peptides in an ATP/ubiquitin-dependent process (22). Though absence of proteasomes in RBCs was reported (23), some of its subunits were recently found in RBCs (6, 24). The number of protein spots whose content was decreased in sickle RBC membrane was smaller and most of them are either components of lipid rafts or actin accessory proteins. Elevated contents of protein repair participants as well as oxygen radical scavengers may reflect the increased demand for the proteins under the harsh oxidative conditions in sickle cells. Sickle cells contain two to three times as many oxygen radicals as control red blood cells (25) with greatly diminished reduced glutathione (GSH) (26). Indeed, there is an inverse correlation between sickle cell density and reduced glutathione levels, with the highest density SS RBCs containing no measurable GSH (26). Therefore, the sickle cell is in double jeopardy for oxidative damage to protein and lipid components (27). From the current protein profiling experiments, it appears that the adaptive response of sickle cells is to increase the levels of proteins that scavenge oxygen radicals, proteins that help refold damaged protein, and proteasomal proteins involved in the turnover of oxidatively damaged proteins. The increased levels of proteins involved in damage control is due to either protein modifications that can occur in the mature RBC or increases in protein levels that would have occurred earlier in erythropoiesis.
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. P. Ammann and S. R. Goodman Cluster Analysis for the Impact of Sickle Cell Disease on the Human Erythrocyte Protein Interactome Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2009; 234(6): 703 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hryniewicz-Jankowska, P. K. Choudhary, L. P. Ammann, C. T. Quinn, and S. R. Goodman Monocyte Protein Signatures of Disease Severity in Sickle Cell Anemia Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2009; 234(2): 210 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Ghatpande, P. K. Choudhary, C. T. Quinn, and S. R. Goodman Pharmaco-Proteomic Study of Hydroxyurea-Induced Modifications in the Sickle Red Blood Cell Membrane Proteome Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2008; 233(12): 1510 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Goodman, A. Kurdia, L. Ammann, D. Kakhniashvili, and O. Daescu The Human Red Blood Cell Proteome and Interactome Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2007; 232(11): 1391 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Goodman, K. M. H. Hughes, D. G. Kakhniashvili, and S. Neelam The Isolation of Reticulocyte-Free Human Red Blood Cells Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2007; 232(11): 1470 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hryniewicz-Jankowska, P. K. Choudhary, and S. R. Goodman Variation in the Monocyte Proteome Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1, 2007; 232(7): 967 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |