EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevanovic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Severs, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevanovic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Severs, W. B.
Experimental Biology and Medicine 231:1610-1615 (2006)
© 2006 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

A BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Central Effects of Ghrelin on Serum Growth Hormone and Morphology of Pituitary Somatotropes in Rats

D. Stevanovic*,1, V. Milosevic{dagger}, D. Nesic*, V. Ajdzanovic{dagger}, V. Starcevic* and W. B. Severs{ddagger}

* Institute of Physiology School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; {dagger} Institute for Biological Research "Sinis a Stankovic," Belgrade, Serbia; and {ddagger} Department of Pharmacology, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033

1To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at Institute of Physiology School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Vis egradska 26/II, Belgrade 11001, Serbia. E-mail: sted{at}eunet.yu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ghrelin, an endogenous ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor, was originally purified from rat stomach; subsequently, ghrelin neurons were found in the arcuate nuclei of rats. Central effects of the peptide on GH release, however, remain to be clarified. The aim of the present study was to determine the morphologic features of GH-producing pituicytes and serum GH concentration after central administration of ghrelin. Five injections of rat ghrelin or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; n = 10 rats/group) were given every 24 hrs (1 µg of ghrelin in 5 µl of PBS) into the lateral cerebral ventricle of male rats. Significant (P < 0.05) increases in absolute and relative pituitary weights occurred in ghrelin-treated rats versus controls (58% and 41%, respectively). Morphometric parameters (i.e., the volume of GH cells, volume of their nuclei, and volume density) all significantly (P < 0.05) increased by 17%, 18%, and 19%, respectively, in the ghrelin-treated group versus controls. Terminal serum concentration of GH was significantly (P < 0.05) increased by 15% with ghrelin treatment. The results clearly document that daily nanomolar doses of ghrelin into the lateral cerebral ventricle stimulate GH cell proliferation and promote GH release. Thus, achieving pharmacologic control of central ghrelin receptors is a promising modality to modulate the actions of GH.

Key Words: ghrelin • cerebroventricular injections • pituitary • GH cells • rats • morphology


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pituitary growth hormone (GH) secretion is regulated by at least two hypothalamic hormones. The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) is a potent stimulator of GH release from somatotropes in the anterior pituitary, whereas somatostatin inhibits GH secretion (1). Since the discovery of metenkephalin–induced GH secretion from the anterior pituitary (2), small synthetic peptide and nonpeptide molecules, called GH secretagogues (GHSs), have been developed. The GHSs stimulate GH release in vivo and in vitro via a mechanism distinct from GHRH (35). In addition, an endogenous peptide ligand for the GHS receptor 1a, ghrelin, has been purified from the rat stomach and subsequently cloned (6). Human ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid, acylated peptide, and it differs from rat ghrelin by only two amino acids at positions 11 and 12. Ghrelin is widely expressed in different rat and human tissues, including the pituitary, hypothalamus, bowel, kidney, heart, pancreas, and testis, suggesting both endocrine and paracrine effects (7). Originally, however, ghrelin was recognized as an important component in the regulation of GH release and appeared to be a third "physiological" regulator of GH release (8). Intravenously administrated ghrelin stimulated GH release in rats (911). Furthermore, ghrelin-positive neurons were found in the arcuate nucleus of the rat hypothalamus in an immunohistochemical study (6), suggesting that ghrelin of central origin also affects GH release. Differing experimental conditions and routes of administration, however, have produced various results with regard to GH release (see "Discussion").

The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of daily nanomolar doses of ghrelin by the intracerebroventricular (ICV) route in freely moving, male rats over a period of 5 days and to assess the terminal blood level of GH as well as changes in the immunocytochemical appearance and quantitative morphology of somatotropes of the pituitary gland. The hypothesis to be tested was that small, repetitive doses of centrally administered ghrelin elevates baseline serum GH and, thus, should yield evidence of pituitary changes in GH-producing cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study was performed on adult male Wistar rats (body wt, 200 ± 20 g) bred at the Institute of Biomedical Research "Galenika" in Belgrade, Serbia. They were kept in individual metabolic cages under a 12:12-hr light:dark cycle at 22°C ± 2°C and were accustomed to daily handling. They were fed a balanced diet for laboratory rats (prepared by D.D. Veterinarski zavod Subotica, Subotica, Serbia). Food and water were available to rats ad libitum.

Animal Preparation.
Surgical procedures were performed under ether anesthesia (aether ad narcosis Ph. Iug. III.; produced by Lek, Ljubljana, Slovenia). The rats were implanted with a headset that was used later for ICV injections. A minimum recovery time of 5 days was permitted before the onset of experiments. The headset consisted of a silastic-sealed, 20-gauge cannula (12) implanted into a lateral cerebral ventricle 1 mm posterior and 1.5 mm lateral to the bregma and 3 mm below the cortical surface. A small, stainless steel anchor screw was placed at a remote site on the skull. The cannula and screw were cemented to the skull with dental acrylic (Simgal; Galenika, Belgrade, Serbia).

Animal Treatment.
After recovery, rats were divided into two groups, with each group containing 10 animals. The first group consisted of rats that were ICV treated with 1 µg of rat ghrelin (lot no. C-et-004; Global Peptide Services, LLC, Ft. Collins, CO) dissolved in 5 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) every 24 hrs during five consecutive days. This dose was based on the results of previous studies (13) and pilot experiments in our laboratory. The second group was a control group comprised of rats treated in the same manner, except that the control rats received only 5 µl of PBS. All animals were sacrificed by decapitation during deep anesthesia 2 hrs after the last injection. Experimental protocols were approved by the local Animal Care Committee and conformed to the recommendations given in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Light Microscopy and Immunocytochemistry.
Pituitary glands were excised, fixed in Bouin’s solution for 48 hr, and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections (thickness, 5 µm) were deparaffinized in xylol and serial alcohol. Pituitary hormones were localized by the peroxidase-antiperoxidase complex (PAP) method (14). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by the incubation in 9 mM hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 mins at ambient temperature. Before application of specific primary antisera, nonspecific background staining was minimized by incubation of the sections with nonimmune porcine serum diluted with PBS (pH 7.4) for 60 mins. Sections were then overlaid with the appropriate dilutions of the specific primary antibodies (hGH-antisera; Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) for 24 h at 4°C. After washing in PBS, sections were incubated for another 60 mins with the second antibody-swine-antirabbit IgG for 45 mins, rinsed again with PBS for 10 mins, and then incubated with rabbit PAP serum for 45 mins. Antibody localization was visualized by incubating the sections in Tris-HCl–buffered saline (0.05 M, pH 7.4) supplemented with 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (DAB; Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and 9 mM hydrogen peroxide. Slides were thoroughly washed under running tap water, counterstained with hematoxylin, and mounted in Canada balsam (Alkaliod, Skopje, Macedonia). Control sections were incubated without primary antisera or by substituting nonimmune rabbit serum for the primary antiserum. Digital images were made on a DM RB Photomicroscope Olympus BX51 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a DP70 digital camera (Olympus) for acquisition and analysis of the images.

Morphometry.
Measurements were performed on sections from the widest portion of the pituitary gland, and immunocytochemically labelled GH cells were analyzed by the M42 test system (15). The standard methods and formulae described by Weibel and Gomez (16) were used for the calculations of the cell and nuclear volumes. The mean value for each rat was computed from 50 fields from the three widest sections (n = 150 measurements/rat). The measurements were taken by an investigator who was unaware of the animal’s treatment history.

Hormone Assay.
Blood samples were collected immediately after each animal was killed, and separated serum was stored at –20°C until assayed. Serum concentrations of GH in control and experimental rats were measured using the Delfia method (hGH-Delfia kits; LKB, Turku, Finland). This radioimmunoassay has an intraassay variability of 3%–4%, an interassay variability of 6%–7%, and a sensitivity of 30 ng/l.

Statistical Analyses.
Biochemical and morphometric data obtained from each rat were averaged per experimental group, and the standard deviation of the mean (SD) was calculated. The Student’s t test was used to evaluate differences between the two groups, and a probability value of 5% or less was considered to be statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Data summarizing the body weight and the absolute and relative weights of the pituitary glands of the control and ghrelin-treated groups appear in Table 1Go. A non-significant (P > 0.05) increase in body weight (13%) was observed in ghrelin-treated rats versus controls. Absolute and relative pituitary weights were significantly (P < 0.05) increased in peptide-treated animals by 58% and 41%, respectively, compared with the controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of Intracerebroventricularly Applied Ghrelin on Body Weight and on Absolute and Relative Pituitary Weight in Adult Male Ratsa
 
Immunocytochemically identified GH cells in control rat pituitaries ranged from ovoidal to pyramidal in shape, with a centrally located spherical nucleus. The GH cells usually were situated along sinusoids. These cells were intensely stained (Fig. 1AGo). In the rats treated with ghrelin, neither the shape nor the localization of GH immunoreactive cells was significantly changed compared with the controls, but their staining properties were significantly changed. Small, specific secretory granules were distributed mainly at the periphery of the cytoplasm (Fig. 1BGo).


Figure 1
View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Typical appearance of immunohistochemically labeled GH cells (arrows). (A) Control rats. (B) Ghrelin-treated rats (PAP). Bar, 10 µm. Color figure available on-line.

 
The three morphometric parameters measured in the present study (i.e., the volume of the GH cells, their nuclear volume, and the volume density) are depicted in Figure 2Go. As Figure 2Go illustrates, these three morphometric parameters increased by 17%, 18%, and 19%, respectively, in male rats treated with ICV ghrelin versus controls, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. (A) Cellular volume (µm3) of the immunoreactive GH cells. (B) Nuclear volume (µm3) of GH cells. (C) Relative volume density (%) of GH cells expressed as a percentage of the total gland tissue. All values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 10 animals/group). An asterisk indicates a significant (P < 0.05) difference versus control.

 
Serum concentration of GH was significantly increased (P < 0.05) by 15% after ghrelin treatment compared with the concentration in control rats (Fig. 3Go).


Figure 3
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Serum concentration of GH in adult male rats. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 10 animals/group). An asterisk indicates a significant (P < 0.05) difference versus control.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study demonstrated that the ICV ghrelin regimen over a 5-day period clearly stimulated GH release. The biochemical data (i.e., increased serum GH concentration 2 hrs after the last injection) were consistent with stimulatory changes observed by quantitative morphology of somatotropes from the pituitaries of the same rats. Thus, ghrelin might play an important role in the regulation of GH secretion. This effect could result from a direct action of ghrelin or by interaction with other GH-releasing peptides, other neurohumoral control mechanisms, or both.

The present results also demonstrate statistically significant changes in morphometric parameters of the pituitary gland. Ghrelin changed both absolute and, more importantly, relative pituitary weight, suggesting hypertrophic as well as hyperplasic effects of the centrally applied peptide. Other immunohistochemical features of GH cells support the opinion that hypertrophic and hyperplasic changes are related primarily to GH cells, because GH total cell volumes were significantly increased (17%) compared with controls. Significant increases (18%) in GH cell nuclear volumes suggested higher ghrelin-induced GH cell nuclear activity, indicative of increased cell function when the 5-day experiment was ended. Finally, relative volume density of GH cells showed that after prolonged treatment with ghrelin, GH cells significantly increased in number (19%) compared to other pituitary cell types.

The present results appear to be comparable to those of other related studies. Two independent groups (8, 9) demonstrated that a single ICV dose of ghrelin to rats increased the plasma GH concentration in a dose-dependent manner, peaking 15–20 mins after administration and returning to baseline 60 mins later, which suggests that ghrelin was acting on its receptors in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis to directly stimulate GH release. Data from Wren et al. (17) support these conclusions, but with much higher ICV doses of ghrelin (10 µg/rat). Date et al. (9) also showed that a continuous ICV administration of ghrelin for 12 days increased the plasma GH concentration measured on Day 6 but did not sustain this high GH concentration on Day 12, although the GH level was still higher on Day 12 compared with the baseline on Day 1.

A number of studies have suggested that the pattern of peripheral ghrelin administration is important for GH effects. For example, 7-day intermittent intravenous infusions (every 3 hrs) of ghrelin augmented GH secretion, whereas continuous infusion suppressed GH secretory episodes (18, 19). Intravenous administration of 3–12 nmol/kg of ghrelin in freely moving rats caused a dose-dependent increase in GH release (911). Ghrelin also was reasonably effective in vitro in a dose-dependant manner (6). This study by Kojima et al. showed a specific effect of ghrelin on GH release, because the other pituitary hormones were unaffected. The effects of ghrelin in vivo, however, appear to be much stronger than the in vitro effect and to be more potent in humans than in animals (20).

The potency of ghrelin, as measured through its GH-releasing ability, was higher than that of GHRH and comparable to that of synthetic GHS (21). Results of several studies also have suggested that the important component of the GH stimulatory effect of ghrelin is at the hypothalamic level and that, for ghrelin to be operative on GH secretion, the normal functioning of the GHRH neurons/receptor also is necessary (22, 23). Ghrelin increases the activity of cells in the arcuate nucleus, including NPY, GHRH, and POMC cells (7).

It should be pointed out that some studies, unlike our own and those cited above, have shown no effects of ghrelin on GH release. The reasons for such disparity are uncertain. Kamegai et al. (13) did not observe stimulation of GH cells after ICV administration of ghrelin (1 µg/rat) either after a single dose or after six doses every 12 hrs. Also, Tamura et al. (8) found significant ghrelin-induced GH secretion with higher, supraphysiologic doses. To our knowledge, no significant correlation between GH and ghrelin levels has, as yet, been observed in either rats (24) or humans (25), and this fact does not support the concept that ghrelin is an essential regulator of GH physiology. Studies with GHS-receptor knockout models have suggested only a moderate effect of ghrelin in physiologic GH regulation (26, 27), but some recent studies have demonstrated strong activity of ghrelin on the regulation of pulsatile GH secretion (28).

The half-life of circulating ghrelin is approximately 30 mins (26), and the half-life of circulating rat GH is approximately 10 mins (29). Thus, we conclude that the low doses of ICV ghrelin over the present 5-day protocol that increased serum GH concentration 2 hrs after the last treatment likely reflect a central action of the peptide.

King (30) and Cummings et al. (31) have reviewed and discussed the multiple "short-term signal hormones," including ghrelin, cholecystokinin, peptide YY, and GLP-1, on central mechanisms controlling eating behavior and energy metabolism. More information, however, is necessary to understand when each of these systems operates physiologically. Guillemin (32), in his Starling Lecture, noted that "[t]he ultimate physiological control of the secretion of GH is by now multi-level and not totally clear." More specifically, he stated that "an ultimate and satisfactory explanation of the inter-relationships between GHRH, somatostatin and ghrelin is still to be explored."

In summary, the present study showed that repetitive central ghrelin administration increased serum GH levels and augmented pituitary GH cell volumes, GH cell nuclear volumes, as well as relative volume density. Thus, we support the opinion that ghrelin acts centrally as a stimulus to GH release. Development of pharmacologic agents to selectively alter ghrelin receptors may thus be a modality to influence GH physiology. Additional work will be necessary to determine whether ghrelin contributes to GH pulsatility and to define the exact role of ghrelin not only in GH physiology but also in the etiology of different pituitary-related diseases, including obesity or other disorders of energy metabolism.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Milan Jokanovic (Director, Institute of Biomedical Research "Galenika," Belgrade, Serbia) for providing metabolic cages, Branislava Brkic (Special Hospital for Heart and Blood Vessels "Ostrog," Belgrade, Serbia) for contributing to the biochemical analysis, and Snezana Markovic (Olympus, Belgrade, Serbia) for taking the digital images.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by the Serbian Ministry for Science and Environmental Protection.

Received for publication March 8, 2006. Accepted for publication April 20, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Milosevic V, Brkic B, Velkovski SD, Sekulic M, Lovren M, Starcevic V, Severs WB. Morphometric and functional changes of rat pituitary somatotropes and lactotropes after central administration of somatostatin. Pharmacology 57:28–34, 1998.[Medline]
  2. Bowers CY, Momanu F, Reynolds GA, Chang D, Hong A, Chang K. Structure-activity relationships of a synthetic pentapeptide that specifically releases growth hormone in vitro. Endocrinology 106: 663–667, 1980.[Medline]
  3. Bowers CY, Momanu F, Reynolds GA, Chang D, Hong A. On the in vitro and in vivo activity of a new synthetic hexapeptide that acts on the pituitary to specifically release growth hormone. Endocrinology 114: 1537–1545, 1984.[Abstract]
  4. Bowers CY, Reynolds GA, Durham D, Barrera CM, Pezzoli SS, Thorner MO. Growth hormone (GH)–releasing peptide stimulates GH release in normal men and acts synergistically with GH-releasing hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:975–982, 1990.[Abstract]
  5. Cheng K, Chan WW, Barreto A Jr, Konvey EM, Smith RG. Endocrinology 124:2791–2798, 1989.[Abstract]
  6. Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Ghrelin is a growth hormone releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 402:656–660, 1999.[Medline]
  7. Korbonits M, Goldstone AP, Gueorguiev M, Grossman AB. Ghrelin—a hormone with multiple functions. Front Neuroendocrinol 25:27–68, 2004.[Medline]
  8. Tamura H, Kamegai J, Shimizu T, Ishii S, Sugihara H, Oikawa S. Ghrelin stimulates GH but not food intake in arcuate nucleus ablated rats. Endocrinology 143:3268–3275, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Date Y, Murakami N, Kojima M, Kuroiwa T, Matsukura S, Kangowa K, Nakazato M. Central effects of a novel acylated peptide, ghrelin, on growth hormone release in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 275: 477–480, 2000.[Medline]
  10. Seoane LM, Tovar L, Baldelli R, Arvat E, Ghigo E, Casanueva FF, Diguez C. Ghrelin elicits a marked stimulatory effect on GH secretion in freely-moving rats. Eur J Endocrinol 14:R7–R9, 2000.
  11. Tolle V, Zizzari P, Tomasetto C, Rio MC, Epelbaum J, Bluet-Pajot MT. In vivo and in vitro effects of ghrelin/motilin-related peptide on growth hormone secretion in rat. Neuroendocrinology 73:54–61, 2001.[Medline]
  12. Starcevic VP, Morrow BA, Farner LA, Keil LC, Severs WB. Long-term recording of cerebrospinal fluid pressure in freely behaving rats. Brain Res 462:112–117, 1988.[Medline]
  13. Kamegai J, Tamura H, Shimizu T, Ishii S, Sugihara H, Wakabayashi I. Chronic central infusion of ghrelin increases hypothalamic neuropeptide Y and Agouti-related protein mRNA levels and body weight in rats. Diabetes 50:2438–2443, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sternberger LA, Hardy PHJ, Cuculius JJ, Meyer HG. The unlabelled antibody enzyme method of immunohistochemistry. Preparation and properties of soluble antigen-antibody complex (horseradish peroxidase-antihorseradish peroxidase) and its use in identification of spirochetes. J Histochem Cytochem 18:315–333, 1970.[Abstract]
  15. Weibel ER. Stereological methods. 1. Practical methods for biological morphometry. London: Academic Press, pp1–415, 1979.
  16. Weibel ER, Gomez DM. A principle for counting tissue structures on random sections. J Appl Physiol 17:343–348, 1962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wren AM, Small CJ, Ward HL, Murphy KG, Dakin CL, Taheri S, Kennedy AR, Roberts GH, Morgan DGA, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. The novel hypothalamic peptide ghrelin stimulates food intake and growth hormone secretion. Endocrinology 141:4325–4328, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Baily ART, Giles ME, Brown CH, Bull PM, MacDonald LP, Smith LC, Smith RG, Leng G, Dickson SL. Chronic central infusion of growth hormone secretagogues: effects on fos expression and peptide gene expression in the rat arcuate nucleus. Neuroendocrinology 70:83–92, 1999.[Medline]
  19. Thompson NM, Davies JS, Mode A, Houston PA, Wells T. Pattern-dependent suppression of growth hormone pulsatility by ghrelin and GHRP-6 in moderately GH-deficient rats. Endocrinology 144:4859–4867, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Muccioli G, Tschop M, Papotti, Deghengni R, Heiman M, Ghigo E. Neuroendocrine and peripheral activities of ghrelin: implications in metabolism and obesity. Eur J Pharmacol 440:235–254, 2002.[Medline]
  21. Bowers CY. Unnatural growth hormone–releasing peptide begets natural ghrelin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1464–1469, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  22. Inui A. Ghrelin: an orexigenic and somatotropic signal from the stomach. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:551–560, 2001.[Medline]
  23. Maheshwari HG, Rahim A, Shalet SM, Baumann G. Selective lack of growth hormone (GH) response to the GH-releasing peptide hexarelin in patients with GH-releasing hormone receptor deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:956–959, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Shuto Y, Shibasaki T, Otagiri A, Kuriyama H, Ohata H, Tamura H, Kamegai J, Sugihara H, Oikava S, Wakabayashi I. Hypothalamic growth hormone secretagogue receptor regulates growth hormone secretion feeding and adiposity. J Clin Invest 109:1429–1436, 2002.[Medline]
  25. Sun Y, Wang P, Zheng H, Smith RG. Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone release and appetite is mediated through the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:4679–4684, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tolle V, Bassant MH, Zizzari P. Ultradian rhythmicity of ghrelin secretion in relation with GH, feeding behavior, and sleep-wake patterns in rats. Endocrinology 143:1353–1361, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tolle V, Kadem M, Bluet-Pajot MT, Frere D, Foulon C, Bossu C, Dardennes R, Mounier C, Zizzari P, Lang F, Epelbaum J, Estour B. Balance in ghrelin and leptin plasma levels in anorexia nervosa patients and constitutionally thin women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:109–116, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Tannenbaum GS, Epelbaum J, Bowers CY. 2003. Interrelationship between the novel peptide ghrelin and somatostatin/growth hormone–releasing hormone in regulation of pulsatile growth hormone secretion. Endocrinology 144:967–974, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Osborn BL, Abramson FP. Pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies using uniformly stable isotope-labelled proteins with HPLC/CRIMS detection. Biopharm Drug Dispos 19:439–444, 1998.[Medline]
  30. King PJ. The hypothalamus and obesity. Current Drug Targets 6:225–240, 2005.[Medline]
  31. Cummings DE, Foster-Schubert KE, Overduin J. Ghrelin and energy balance: focus on current controversies. Current Drug Targets 6:153–169, 2005.[Medline]
  32. Guillemin R. Hypothalamic hormones a.k.a. hypothalamic releasing factors. J Endocrinol 184:11–28, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevanovic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Severs, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevanovic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Severs, W. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS