|
|
||||||||
Division of Experimental Vascular Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at Division of Experimental Vascular Research, Wallenberg Neurocentrum, BMC A13, Lund University, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden. E-mail: Roya.Jamali{at}med.lu.se; Royajam4{at}yahoo.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endothelin sarafotoxin 6c ETB receptor protein kinases
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was previously revealed that contractile ETB receptors on vascular smooth-muscle cells are upregulated via de novo transcription after organ culture (3, 4) and experimental focal cerebral ischemia (5). However, the intracellular signaling pathways responsible for this upregulation remain elusive. We have evidence for the involvement of protein kinase C (PKC) in the upregulation both in cerebral and mesenteric arteries after organ culture (6, 7). In addition, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) represents a group of serine/threonine kinases that play an important role in the intracellular signaling in response to extracellular stimuli (8). The different MAPKs are involved in such important cellular functions as proliferation, differentiation, and survival. There are three major MAPK pathways in mammals: the extracellular signalregulated kinase (ERK1/2), the p38 and the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; Ref. 9). Of these, the ERK1/2 pathway is activated by mitogenic stimulation, whereas JNK and p38 are so-called stress-activated protein kinases (SAPK), activated by various stress stimuli, for example, cytokines (10). We have evidence for the involvement of ERK1/2 in the ETB receptor upregulation after 24 hrs of incubation (11).
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ETB receptor upregulation can be attenuated by treatment with PKC or MAPK inhibitors after initiation of the upregulation procedure and to evaluate the time dependency. This information will hypothetically be essential in defining the therapeutic situations in which ETB receptor upregulation can be modified.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By first studying the S6c responses, we obtained a selective activation of ETB receptors. However, this procedure desensitizes the ETB receptors, and the subsequent application of ET-1 caused the selective activation of ETA receptors (3, 12). When using inhibitors, the PKC inhibitor, RO-317549; the ERK1/2 inhibitor, SB386023; and the JNK inhibitor, SP600125, were added 3, 6, or 12 hrs after initiation of the incubation. Thus, each segment was incubated with inhibitor for 21, 18, and 12 hrs, respectively, and a 24-hr incubation with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) was the control. The Animal Ethics Committee, Lund University, Sweden, approved the experiments.
In Vitro Pharmacology.
Sensitive myographs were used for recording the isometric tension in isolated basilar artery segments. The basilar artery segments were threaded on two 40-µm-diameter stainless steel wires and mounted in Mulvany-Halpern myographs (Danish Myo Technology A/S, Aarhus, Denmark). One wire was connected to a force displacement transducer and attached to an analog-to-digital converter unit (AD Instruments, Hastings, UK). The other wire was attached to a movable displacement device, allowing fine adjustments of vascular tension by varying the distance between the wires. The experiments were recorded on a PC computer using the software program, Chart (AD Instruments). The mesenteric artery segments were mounted on two L-shaped prongs, one of which was attached to a Grass FT-03 transducer (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA) connected to a Power Lab unit (AD Instruments) for continuous recording of isometric tension. The segments were immersed in temperature-controlled (37° C) tissue baths containing physiologic salt solution buffer for basilar segments and standard buffer solution for mesenteric segments. A tension of 2.5 mN for mesenteric artery or 1.2 mN for basilar artery was applied to each segment, and the segments were allowed to stabilize at this tension for 1 hr before being exposed to a K+-rich (63.5 mM) buffer solution (with the same composition as the standard solution, except that NaCl was replaced by an equimolar concentration of KCl). The choice of basal tone to be used was evaluated in detail in previous studies. The K+-induced contraction was used as a reference for the contractile capacity. Concentration-response curves for the specific ETB receptor agonist, S6c, were obtained by cumulative administration of the peptide. The vessels were washed and allowed to recover before ET-1 concentration-response curves were performed. The specific receptor stimulation was analyzed in detail before using selective antagonists (13; for further methodologic details, see Refs. 6 and 12).
Segments to be used for immunohistochemistry were cultured as explained above in "Removal of Vessels and Organ Culture Procedure" for 24 hrs with or without inhibitors added 6 hrs after initiation of incubation. All of the segments were rapidly frozen and subsequently stored at 80° C until use.
Molecular Biology.
Segments to be used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were cultured for 24 hrs and the PKC inhibitor, RO-317549; the ERK1/2 inhibitor, SB386023; or the JNK inhibitor, SP600125, were added after 3, 6, or 12 hrs after initiation of the incubation. Thus, each segment was incubated with inhibitors for 21, 18, or 12 hrs, respectively, and 24 hrs of incubation with DMSO was used as a control. Vessel segments were snap frozen at 80° C, and total cellular RNA was extracted using the FastRNA, Pro Green kit (Qbiogene, Illkersh, France) for 60 secs in the FastPrep FP120 instrument (Qbiogene), according to the suppliers instructions. The resulting pellet was finally washed with 70% ethanol, air-dried, and redissolved in 50 µL diethyl-pyrocarbonatetreated water. Reverse transcription of total RNA to complementary DNA (cDNA) was carried out using the GeneAmp RNA PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in a Perkin-Elmer DNA Thermal cycler. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 200 ng total RNA in a 40-µL reaction volume using random hexamers as primers. The reaction mixture was incubated at 25° C for 10 mins, 48° C for 15 mins, heated to 95° C for 5 mins, and chilled to 5° C for 5 mins. Real-time PCR was performed in a GeneAmp 5700 Sequence Detection System using the GeneAmp SYBR-Green kit (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) with the cDNA synthesized above as the template in a 40-µl reaction volume. A no-template control was included in all experiments. The GeneAmp 5700 Sequence Detection System monitors the growth of DNA in real time, using an optics and imaging system, via the binding of a fluorescent dye to double-stranded DNA. Specific primers were designed as follows: ETA receptor, forward: 5'-ATTGCCCTCAGC-GAACAC-3' , reverse: 5'-CAACCAAGCAGAAA-GACGGTC-3' ; and ETB receptor, forward: 5'-GATACGACAACTTCCGCTCCA-3' , reverse: 5'-GTCCACGATGAGGACAATGAG-3' .
The product of a housekeeping gene that is continuously expressed to a constant amount in cells, elongation factor-1 (EF-1) messenger RNA (mRNA), forward: 5'-GCAAGCCCATGTGTGTTGAA-3' , and reverse: 5'-TGATGACACCCACAGCAACTG-3' , was used as a reference. The real-time PCR was carried out with the following profile: 50° C for 2 mins, 95° C for 10 mins, followed by 40 cycles at 95° C for 15 secs and at 60° C for 1 min.
Immunohistochemistry.
Segments were inserted in a block of Tissue TEK (Sakura Finetek Europe, Zoerter-woude, The Netherlands) and were frozen. The segments were cut into 8-µm-thick sections with a cryostat and stored at 80° C until use. The sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 mins. The segments were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated overnight with primary antibodies to ETB receptor (rabbit anti-human ETB, 1:400 dilution; IBL 16207; Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Gunma, Japan), ETA receptor (goat anti-human ETA, 1:100 dilution; sc-21194; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA), and 10% fetal calf serum in PBS. The next day, they were washed and incubated with secondary antibodies, donkey anti-rabbit conjugated to Cy5, and donkey anti-goat conjugated to Cy2 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Soham, Cambridgeshire, UK) for 2 hrs and observed using a Leica confocal microscope (Solms, Germany). As a control for the efficiency of antibodies, segments were incubated with only secondary antibody. All of the groups (control, PKC, ERK1/2, and JNK) for each vessel were examined at the same time. For each group, three rats were used and studied in four different sections.
Drugs and Solutions.
The standard buffer solution used for mesenteric artery consisted of: 119 mM NaCl, 15 mM NaHCO3, 4.6 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 1.5 mM CaCl2, and 5.5 mM glucose. The physiologic salt solution buffer used for basilar artery had the following composition: 125 mM NaCl, 5 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM KCl, 0.5 mM NaH2PO4, 2 mM MgCl2 · 6H2O, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.05 mM bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 10 mM glucose. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. Analytical grade chemicals and double-distilled water were used for preparing all solutions. ET-1 and S6c were purchased from Sigma and Alexis Biochemicals (Lausen, Switzerland), respectively, and dissolved in 0.9% saline with 10% BSA (Kabi, Stockholm, Sweden). RO-317549 (Calbiochem, Nottingham, UK), SB386023, and SP600125 (Sigma) were dissolved in DMSO.
Statistics.
The Emax values refer to the maximum contraction calculated as percentage of the contractile capacity of potassium. Results are given as mean ± SEM, and n refers to the number of vessel segments. There were 46 rats in each group and 46 vessel segments from each rat. The pEC50 value is the negative logarithmic value of the concentration of the stimulator (S6c or ET-1) that is needed to produce half of the maximal contraction in our vessels. When the vessels were incubated with inhibitors, the pEC50 decreased, which means that higher concentrations of S6c are required to induce the same maximal contraction. This value was calculated from the line between the concentrations above and below the midpoint of the concentration-response curve.
The Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test with Dunns post hoc test was used for all statistical analyses. The level of significance was for all tests set to P values less than 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PKC Inhibition.
In the basilar arteries, administration of the PKC inhibitor, 3 hrs after initiation of the organ culture, abolished upregulation of ETB receptors at mRNA and functional levels.
Basilar arteries incubated with the PKC inhibitor (Fig. 1a
) showed attenuated contraction by S6c (Table 1
); the response to S6c at 21 hrs of incubation with RO317549 was 0% (P < 0.0001) and at 18 hrs of incubation was 12 ± 5% of the potassium-induced responses (P < 0.001). The pEC50 value was 8.87 ± 0.16 in control and 6.86 ± 1.15 at 12 hrs incubation, and there was a significant difference (P < 0.01) between control and 21 or 18 hrs, but not between control and 12 hrs.
|
|
|
|
Incubation of mesenteric artery segments with the ERK1/2 inhibitor, SB386023, attenuated the contraction induced by S6c; to 0% at 21 hrs and 18 hrs incubation but had almost no effect at 12 hrs of incubation. The results show that the effect of SB386023 was significant (P < 0.003). Between groups, the effect was significant only for 21 hrs (P < 0.05) and 18 hrs (P < 0.01), and was not significant for 12 hrs. The pEC50 value was significantly lower at 21 hrs and 18 hrs (P < 0.01), but not at 12 hrs (Fig. 2b
; Table 2
). Incubation of basilar and mesenteric arteries with the ERK1/2 inhibitor showed a marked decrease in the pEC50 value, indicating that higher concentrations of S6c are required to induce the same maximal contraction in these vessel segments.
JNK Inhibition.
In basilar arteries, incubation with the JNK inhibitor, SP600125 (Fig. 1c
; Table 1
) showed attenuated contraction after 21 and 18 hrs of incubation with S6c, from 66% in control to 6% and 8%, respectively, of the potassium-induced responses. This effect of the JNK inhibitor decreased with time of incubation and was less effective (38 ± 11%) at 12 hrs. The pEC50 value for control (8.48 ± 0.07) was significantly (P < 0.0001) lower at 21 hrs and 18 hrs, but not at 12 hrs.
In mesenteric arteries, the JNK inhibitor had a weak effect only when added 3 hrs after the start of incubation. The contraction induced by S6c was reduced from 95 ± 13% to 73 ± 15% of the potassium-induced contraction. The P value for all groups was not significant (P < 0.17). The pEC50 value was 8.18 ± 0.14 in control and was 7.87 ± 0.19 at 12 hrs of incubation, which were not significantly different (Fig. 2c
; Table 2
).
Effect of Inhibition on ETA Receptors.
After S6c desensitization of the ETB receptors, the addition of ET-1 induced selective activation of ETA receptors. As can be seen for the basilar (Table 1
) and mesenteric arteries (Table 2
), there were no changes in the ETA receptormediated responses after co-incubation with either of the protein kinase inhibitors.
Real-Time PCR.
To address the question of whether the alterations in S6c induced responses were caused by changes in receptor expression, we studied changes in ETB receptor mRNA levels with real-time PCR after organ culture with or without the inhibitors. Organ culture with the inhibitors, RO317549, SB386023, and SP600125, for 21 hrs, 18 hrs, and 12 hrs resulted in reduced levels of the ETB receptor mRNA expression as compared with the control group, which consisted of organ segments cultured for 24 hrs with DMSO (Fig. 3
).
|
In mesenteric arteries, incubation with RO317549 or SB386023 showed lower mRNA levels for the ETB receptor expression, as compared with control (Fig. 4
), but it was not changed after incubation with SP600125. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the control and the arteries that were incubated with SB386023 (P < 0.01), or RO317549 (P < 0.05) for 21 hrs, but not between the other groups (18 hrs and 12 hrs). None of the inhibitors used in this study affected the ETA receptor mRNA expression (data not shown). The results from the functional study are more significant than PCR results. It is suggested that the transcription from DNA to mRNA happens earlier than translation from mRNA to protein or functional levels.
|
Basilar arteries (Fig. 5A
and 6
) showed a decrease in intensity for ETB receptors after incubation with PKC, ERK1/2, and JNK inhibitors. The ERK1/2 inhibitor had a stronger effect than the other inhibitors. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between control and inhibitors (P < 0.001).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We found that the ET receptors are upregulated in stroke, both in models in rat (5, 15) and in human (16). An enhanced ETB receptormediated contraction of the rat basilar artery has been reported after incubation with the proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin-1ß and tumor necrosis factor-
, thus, supporting the hypothesis that inflammatory components might be involved. The upregulation of ET receptors after stroke might be caused by changes occurring in the perfusion pressure during and after the occlusion (14). Cattaruzza et al. presented data revealing that the ETB receptor mRNA levels in rat aortic smooth muscle cells are increased by up to 10-fold after periodic stretch (17). Furthermore, several studies have shown that there are increased levels of circulating ET-1 in ischemic stroke (18). These studies all suggest an important role of ET and ET receptors in the pathophysiologic mechanisms in cerebral blood vessels after ischemic stroke.
Experimental studies using the organ culture model have provided a method to mimic these changes and to study the intracellular mechanisms involved in more detail, such as the time course of both mRNA and functional receptor changes (19). The receptor upregulation occurs via de novo transcription with subsequent translation (3, 19). It was previously shown that co-incubation with an ERK1/2 inhibitor for 24 hrs in organ culture study attenuates the upregulation of ETB receptors in the mesenteric artery. The present study focused on understanding whether the upregulation can be attenuated by treating the tissue after the event has been initiated. This might provide a basis for consideration in clinical situations in which one hopes to intervene. The reasons for initiation of receptor upregulation are still unclear, but occur in arthrosclerosis, in ischemia, and in situations of reduced blood flow. Hypothetically, changes in shear stress is one way to increase the ETB receptor upregulation, as can be seen by elevation in intramural pressure in a vascular segment.1 The molecules triggering this on the cell surface have, thus far, not been identified. The further events that occur in the process involves several cellular signaling pathways; such as release of intracellular calcium and activation of MAPK-dependent signaling pathways (20, 21). ERK1/2 and JNK are involved in the signaling pathways from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where they regulate gene expression. These signaling cascades result in rapid increases in the early response genes, c-fos, c-jun, and c-myc (21), which result in cell proliferation and enhanced contraction (22, 23).
However, ETB receptors have the ability to activate the ERK1/2 and JNK pathways via parallel pathways that are differentially regulated by PKC and calcium ions (23).
It has been shown that, in vascular smooth muscle cells expressing ETB receptors, ET-1 is more potent in mitogenic activity (24).
In the present study, we examined specific inhibitors of ERK1/2, PKC, and JNK in the signal transduction for upregulation of ETB receptor, and also to what extent the ETB receptors are dependent on these signaling cascades. The PKC inhibitor, RO-317549; the ERK1/2 inhibitor, SB386023; and the JNK inhibitor, SP600125, had inhibitory effects on ETB receptormediated contraction in the pharmacologic studies. In the molecular experiments, the inhibitors had an effect on ETB receptor mRNA expression but had no effect on ETA receptor mRNA (25). Immunohistochemical results showing receptor protein expression were parallel to the quantitative PCR results. The effects on mesenteric arteries were less pronounced than those found in basilar arteries, which may depend on vessel size or on being related to the vascular region studied.
In basilar arteries, the most effective inhibitor was the ERK1/2 inhibitor, SB386023, which had an effect even after 12 hrs of organ culture, both on contraction and on the mRNA levels of ETB receptors. SP600125 and RO317549 were efficient only when the incubation time was 21 and 18 hrs. There was a difference between the pharmacologic studies and mRNA levels of the ETB receptor with these inhibitors. Even after 18 hrs and 12 hrs of incubation, they decreased the contraction induced by S6c, whereas they did not show a significant decrease in mRNA levels compared with the ERK1/2 inhibitor. It seems that to observe the reaction of mRNA levels by these inhibitors requires more time points of incubation, but they succeed in decreasing the contraction of ETB receptors in pharmacologic studies. Thus, the ERK1/2 system might have a more central role in the upregulation process.
Our results show that the time point was not as important in the inhibitory effect of the ERK1/2 inhibitor on the contraction induced by S6c. Even the mRNA levels of ETB receptor did not show a significant difference between 21, 18, and 12 hrs of incubation, and all of them showed a significant difference from control. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that the ERK1/2 pathway is the pathway that the cell machinery primarily activates to initiate ETB receptor upregulation during organ culture. In agreement with this suggestion, it was shown that ERK1/2 phosphorylation after organ culture increased from the first hour and stayed elevated for up to 24 hrs, whereas JNK phosphorylation increased at the first hour and then decreased to a low level after 6 hrs.2
In mesenteric arteries, the ERK1/2 inhibitor also had the strongest inhibitory effect on the upregulation of ETB receptors and contraction induced by S6c. The mRNA levels of ETB receptors after incubation for 21 hrs with ERK1/2 inhibitor were significantly different compared with control. In addition, at 18 and 12 hrs of incubation, the inhibitory effect of the ERK1/2 blocker was more pronounced compared with the PKC and JNK inhibitors. The PKC inhibitor had less effect compared with the ERK1/2 inhibitor. The JNK inhibitor had no effect on mesenteric arteries. The immunohistochemical study did not show any significant difference between the groups (P = 0.14), possibly because of only a single time point being studied and a lower degree of quantification with that method. However, the upregulated ETB receptors were located on the smooth muscle cells, because, in our experiment, we removed the endothelial layer and, thus, the receptor upregulation happens in the media and the protein kinase inhibitors were able to reduce this expression.
We studied ETA and ETB receptor upregulation at three different levels; at the mRNA, functional receptor, and protein levels. By comparing the results from mesenteric and basilar arteries, it is suggested that the signal trans-duction involved in ETB receptor upregulation is more effective in basilar arteries than in mesenteric arteries. In a previous study, we compared a large number of arteries and veins in relation to ET receptor upregulation. The pattern that emerged is that the vessel size and the functional role of the vessel are important. Resistance arteries show better upregulation than conductance arteries and veins (13).
Our results show that ETB receptor upregulation involves the protein kinase systems (6, 7). The MAPK pathways are thought to act downstream from PKC in the smooth muscle cell regulatory cascade. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that ETB receptor upregulation is initiated by a pathway from PKC, via raf and ERK1/2. Clearly, more experiments are required to delineate all of the aspects of the signal transduction involved.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Lindstedt I, Edvinsson L. 2005. Unpublished data. ![]()
2 Beg S, Edvinsson L. 2005. Unpublished results. ![]()
Received for publication September 17, 2005. Accepted for publication December 22, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |