EBM Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaskins, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaskins, H. R.
Experimental Biology and Medicine 233:107-108 (2008)
© 2008 Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine


EDITORIAL

The Art to Science of Cell and Developmental Biology in EBM

H. Rex Gaskins, Associate Editor

And it is becoming increasingly clear that to understand living systems in any deep sense, we must come to see them not materialistically, as machines, but as (stable) complex, dynamic organization. Twenty-first century biology will concern itself with the great "nonreductionist" 19th century biological problems that molecular biology left untouched. All of these problems are different aspects of one of the great problems in all of science, namely, the nature of (complex) organization.

—Carl R. Woese (1)

With its recent restructuring, Experimental Biology and Medicine (EBM) acknowledges the promise of understanding how the individual components of cells and organisms interact to effect life and the impact this will have on the future of medicine. One’s ability to define the principles of biological organization, in quantitative terms, is advancing at a historic pace. The canvas of biological design is becoming digitized. Lord Kelvin recognized long ago that ‘when you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind’. The founding artist of computer programming Donald Knuth expressed a similar sentiment: ‘Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else we do’. Indeed, profound advances in scientific instrumentation are quickly blurring the boundaries of reductive disciplines; with ever increasing expansion of fully sequenced genomes of first species and now individuals, protein–protein interaction maps being drawn with suborganellar precision, and the ability to scrutinize spatial and temporal scales of the metabolome becoming routine, the networks of life are being viewed for the first time.

Although it is not clear at present if the nonlinear nature of life and the stochastic processes of evolution will preclude the derivation of biological laws, it does seem that the temporal and spatial scales of a sufficiently variable number of complex biological networks will soon be defined in sufficiently quantitative terms to determine if mathematical laws of life indeed exist. The suggestion has been made that "biology is mathematics’ next physics" and that entirely new realms of mathematics will be needed to cope with the high diversity of life and its many scales of spatial and temporal organization (2). At the least it appears clear that we are moving away from the purely reductionist mechanical views of life offered by molecular biology and beginning to "see" the emergent properties of living systems.

Consistent with the historical focus of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (SEBM), we at Experimental Biology and Medicine strive to become again a principal recorder of the new knowledge that is enabling an understanding of the self-organizing complexity underlying the mechanics of life. Although Cell and Developmental Biology debuted as a "category" only with the recent reorganization of existing multidisciplinary categories and emergence of new interdisciplinary categories introduced by our new Editor-in-Chief Steven R. Goodman, EBM and its former iteration Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine have published highly cited papers focusing in one manner or another on cell and developmental topics since its inception in 1903. As a matter of fact, of the 50 most-frequently cited articles in EBM, the top five fall into this category (3). For many decades, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine was recognized as a (the) leading journal of the multidisciplinary life sciences. A great deal of new knowledge from disciplines that generally consider biological systems as whole entities such as anatomy, physiology, and metabolism were published in its pages, enabling insight into interactions among these components.

Fundamental cross-disciplinary collaboration between biologists and computer scientists will be required to understand interactions among components that lie beneath the cell being the fundamental unit of biological organization. Recognizing this, the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board of the National Research Council convened recently a Committee on Frontiers at the Interface of Computing and Biology, who identified ‘Some (relevant) Questions for Cell Biology in the 21st Century’ (4):1

Turning the art of cell and developmental biology into science requires answers to such questions. We seek to publish these contributions not only to archive astounding advancements, but as emphasized often by Samuel James Meltzer, MD (1851–1920), the founder of SEBM, to also ‘understand the fundamental to develop the practical’. Integrating Science and Medicine is the motto of SEBM. We are especially encouraged that knowledge of the interplay between biological pathways within and between cells offers significant promise for novel means of detecting and treating the chronic and complex diseases that remain recalcitrant, and hence the advancement of medicine.

Footnotes

This editorial contains material reprinted with permission from the National Academies Press, Copyright [2005], by the National Academy of Sciences.

1 Reprinted with permission from the National Academies Press, Copyright [2005], National Academy of Sciences. Back

References

  1. Woese CR. A new biology for a new century. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:173–186, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Cohen JE. Mathematics is biology’s next microscope, only better; biology is mathematics next physics, only better. PLoS Biology 2:e439, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. The 50 Most-Frequently Cited Articles in Experimental Biology and Medicine as of August 1, 2007. http://www.ebmonline.org/reports/mfc1.dtl.
  4. Committee on Computing Frontiers: Prospects from Biology, National Research Council. 21st Century Biology. In: Wooley JC, Lin HS, Eds. Catalyzing Inquiry at the Interface of Computing and Biology. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, pp28–29, 2005.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaskins, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaskins, H. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS